Literature DB >> 21553977

Do low-numeracy people avoid shared decision making?

Mirta Galesic1, Rocio Garcia-Retamero.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Doctors have been increasingly encouraged to involve patients in decision making rather than pursuing the paternalistic model in which they make the decisions for their patients. But do patients want to participate in making decisions about their health? Is there a relationship between their preferences for shared decision making and numeracy skills? Are those preferences different in countries with different medical systems, and for different age groups? Extant studies cannot answer these questions because most are based on nonprobabilistic, highly selective patient samples that prevent generalizations to a broader population.
DESIGN: In a survey on probabilistic national samples in the United States and Germany, we interviewed participants with low numeracy skills (Germany: n = 127, mean numeracy = 37; United States: n = 117, mean numeracy = 36) and high numeracy skills (Germany: n = 133, mean numeracy = 96; U.S.: n = 121, mean numeracy = 91). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Usual and preferred role in medical decision making.
RESULTS: A significant number of people with low numeracy in both the United States (35%, SE = 8.2) and Germany (30%, SE = 6.1) preferred to be more passive than they currently were. High-numeracy people, in contrast, were mostly satisfied with their current role. On average, Americans were more active than Germans. Middle-aged participants preferred to be more active compared to both younger and older ones.
CONCLUSIONS: Shared decision-making preferences are related to numeracy skills, country, and age. Education efforts to increase numeracy, as well as using nonquantitative communication formats, may foster involvement of low-numeracy patients in decisions about their health. (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21553977     DOI: 10.1037/a0022723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  14 in total

1.  Patient Experiences Using an Inpatient Personal Health Record.

Authors:  Janet Woollen; Jennifer Prey; Lauren Wilcox; Alexander Sackeim; Susan Restaino; Syed T Raza; Suzanne Bakken; Steven Feiner; George Hripcsak; David Vawdrey
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Shared decision making in patients at risk of cancer: the role of domain and numeracy.

Authors:  Yaniv Hanoch; Talya Miron-Shatz; Jonathan J Rolison; Zehra Omer; Elisa Ozanne
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Health Coaching Has Differential Effects on Veterans with Limited Health Literacy and Numeracy: a Secondary Analysis of ACTIVATE.

Authors:  Sarah S Nouri; Laura J Damschroder; Maren K Olsen; Jennifer M Gierisch; Angela Fagerlin; Linda L Sanders; Felicia McCant; Eugene Z Oddone
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Opportunities for theory-informed decision science in cancer control.

Authors:  Arielle S Gillman; Rebecca A Ferrer
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Nurses' Numeracy and Graphical Literacy: Informing Studies of Clinical Decision Support Interfaces.

Authors:  Karen Dunn Lopez; Diana J Wilkie; Yingwei Yao; Vanessa Sousa; Alessandro Febretti; Janet Stifter; Andrew Johnson; Gail M Keenan
Journal:  J Nurs Care Qual       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.597

Review 6.  Using visual aids to improve communication of risks about health: a review.

Authors:  Rocio Garcia-Retamero; Yasmina Okan; Edward T Cokely
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-05-02

7.  Exploring laypeople's epistemic beliefs about medicine - a factor-analytic survey study.

Authors:  Dorothe Kienhues; Rainer Bromme
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Factors influencing patients' preferences and perceived involvement in shared decision-making in mental health care.

Authors:  Johanne Eliacin; Michelle P Salyers; Marina Kukla; Marianne S Matthias
Journal:  J Ment Health       Date:  2014-10-03

9.  Visual aids improve diagnostic inferences and metacognitive judgment calibration.

Authors:  Rocio Garcia-Retamero; Edward T Cokely; Ulrich Hoffrage
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-16

10.  The Future of Patient Engagement in the Governance of Shared Data.

Authors:  Carolyn Petersen
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2016-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.