Literature DB >> 21553933

Pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous IgPro20 in patients with primary immunodeficiency.

Richard L Wasserman1, Isaac Melamed, Robert P Nelson, Alan P Knutsen, Mary Beth Fasano, Mark R Stein, Mikhail A Rojavin, Joseph A Church.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Immunoglobulin replacement is a standard therapy for patients with primary immunodeficiencies. Subcutaneous administration of immunoglobulin offers more constant IgG levels than intravenous administration and simplifies administration for some patients. Use of L-proline as an excipient contributes to the stability of highly concentrated IgG preparations. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of IgPro20 (Hizentra®), a new 20% subcutaneous IgG solution, and compare the area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) with that of a similar intravenous 10% IgG solution (IgPro10; Privigen®). At the request of the US FDA, an algorithm for determining IgG trough level ratios (TLRs) was developed in order to provide physicians with a practical tool for monitoring doses during steady-state IgPro20 therapy.
METHODS: This was a prospective, open-label, multicentre, single-arm, phase III clinical trial conducted in the US. The study was performed in a primary-care setting. Eligible patients were males or females aged 6-75 years with a primary immunodeficiency (common variable immunodeficiency or X-linked agammaglobulinaemia) who had received regular treatment with IgPro10 for at least 3 months prior to entering this study and had achieved serum trough concentration (C(trough)) values ≥5 g/L. IgPro20 was administered subcutaneously once weekly at initial doses equivalent to 130% of patients' previous doses, based on the results obtained in a Vivaglobin® study and due to an FDA request. After run-in, each patient's dose was adjusted to achieve an AUC comparable to that achieved with IgPro10 administered intravenously.
RESULTS: Eighteen patients completed the study. Mean IgPro20 : IgPro10 dose ratio (dose adjustment coefficient) was 1.53 (range 1.26-1.87). The resulting mean AUCs were 105.6 g · day/L for IgPro20 versus 103.2 g · day/L for IgPro10 (geometric mean ratio 1.002; lower one-sided 95% confidence limit [CL] 0.951). Thus, the primary endpoint of the study was met, as this result exceeded the pre-specified criterion of the lower one-sided 95% CL of ≥0.8 for non-inferiority. At these AUCs, which were considered equivalent, the mean IgPro20 : IgPro10 TLR, determined by the developed algorithm, was 1.29 (range 1.18-1.73). Titres of specific antibodies tested were well above respective product specifications, suggesting that protection against infection would be effective.
CONCLUSION: Steady-state AUCs with subcutaneous IgPro20 and intravenous IgPro10 were equivalent. Mean dose adjustment coefficient and mean TLR can be used for initial dose conversion without risk of under-protection but vary too widely to be considered measures of equivalence. Trial registration number (clinicaltrials.gov): NCT00419341.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21553933     DOI: 10.2165/11587030-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  23 in total

Review 1.  Lymphatic transport of proteins after subcutaneous administration.

Authors:  C J Porter; S A Charman
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 2.  Subcutaneous administration of IgG.

Authors:  Melvin Berger
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.479

3.  Impact of trough IgG on pneumonia incidence in primary immunodeficiency: A meta-analysis of clinical studies.

Authors:  Jordan S Orange; William J Grossman; Roberta J Navickis; Mahlon M Wilkes
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Subcutaneous infusion of gammaglobulins in management of agammaglobulinaemia.

Authors:  A G Ugazio; M Duse; R Re; G Mangili; G R Burgio
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1982-01-23       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Human intravenous immunoglobulin in primary and secondary antibody deficiencies.

Authors:  E R Stiehm
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 6.  Immunoglobulin treatment for primary antibody deficiencies: advantages of the subcutaneous route.

Authors:  Ann Gardulf
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.807

7.  The effect of two different dosages of intravenous immunoglobulin on the incidence of recurrent infections in patients with primary hypogammaglobulinemia. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter crossover trial.

Authors:  H W Eijkhout; J W van Der Meer; C G Kallenberg; R S Weening; J T van Dissel; L A Sanders; P F Strengers; H Nienhuis; P T Schellekens
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-08-07       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Validation of current joint American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology and American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology guidelines for antibody response to the 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine using a population of HIV-infected children.

Authors:  Wasu Kamchaisatian; Watcharaphong Wanwatsuntikul; John W Sleasman; Nutthapong Tangsinmankong
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 10.793

9.  Home therapy with subcutaneous immunoglobulin infusions in children with congenital immunodeficiencies.

Authors:  T G Abrahamsen; H Sandersen; A Bustnes
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Efficacy and safety of a new 20% immunoglobulin preparation for subcutaneous administration, IgPro20, in patients with primary immunodeficiency.

Authors:  John B Hagan; Mary B Fasano; Sheldon Spector; Richard L Wasserman; Isaac Melamed; Mikhail A Rojavin; Othmar Zenker; Jordan S Orange
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 8.317

View more
  27 in total

1.  Immunoglobulins: current understanding and future directions.

Authors:  S Jolles; S C Jordan; J S Orange; I N van Schaik
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Subcutaneous immunoglobulin loading regimens for previously untreated patients with primary antibody deficiency.

Authors:  M Rojavin; J Sidhu; M Pfister; A Hubsch
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Efficacy and tolerability of 16% subcutaneous immunoglobulin compared with 20% subcutaneous immunoglobulin in primary antibody deficiency.

Authors:  H B Niebur; C M Duff; G F Shear; D Nguyen; T K Alberdi; M J Dorsey; J W Sleasman
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 4.  The growing importance of achieving national self-sufficiency in immunoglobulin in Italy. The emergence of a national imperative.

Authors:  Albert Farrugia; Giuliano Grazzini; Isabella Quinti; Fabio Candura; Samantha Profili; Giancarlo M Liumbruno
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 5.  Bringing immunoglobulin knowledge up to date: how should we treat today?

Authors:  S Misbah; T Kuijpers; J van der Heijden; B Grimbacher; D Guzman; J Orange
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 6.  Progress in gammaglobulin therapy for immunodeficiency: from subcutaneous to intravenous infusions and back again.

Authors:  Richard L Wasserman
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 8.317

7.  Calculating the dose of subcutaneous immunoglobulin for primary immunodeficiency disease in patients switched from intravenous to subcutaneous immunoglobulin without the use of a dose-adjustment coefficient.

Authors:  Michael Fadeyi; Tin Tran
Journal:  P T       Date:  2013-12

Review 8.  Current treatment options with immunoglobulin G for the individualization of care in patients with primary immunodeficiency disease.

Authors:  S Jolles; J S Orange; A Gardulf; M R Stein; R Shapiro; M Borte; M Berger
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Bioavailability of IgG administered by the subcutaneous route.

Authors:  Melvin Berger; Stephen Jolles; Jordan S Orange; John W Sleasman
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 8.317

Review 10.  Subcutaneous immunoglobulin for primary and secondary immunodeficiencies: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Jenny Lingman-Framme; Anders Fasth
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.