Literature DB >> 31846609

The growing importance of achieving national self-sufficiency in immunoglobulin in Italy. The emergence of a national imperative.

Albert Farrugia1,2, Giuliano Grazzini3,2, Isabella Quinti4, Fabio Candura2, Samantha Profili2, Giancarlo M Liumbruno2.   

Abstract

Since the inception of industrial plasma fractionation during the Second World War, a succession of protein therapies isolated from plasma have determined the volume of plasma requiring collection, and have also shaped the economics of the industry. These so-called plasma drivers have successively included albumin, coagulation Factor VIII (FVIII) and, for the past thirty years, intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) administered immunoglobulin (IG) solutions. The sale of IG underpins the profitability of the industry and has experienced continuous growth over the past decades, as the result of growing clinical demand. Modelling this demand using decision analysis indicates that supplying the evidence-based indications for IG therapies will generate a need for IG which exceeds the current plasma collection capacity of most countries. A notable exception to this situation is the United States (US) of America, whose population of compensated plasma donors generates two thirds of the global supply of plasma for fractionation. The US is also the leading consumer of IG, and its health care providers pay the highest price for the product globally. Shortages of IG occur whenever the demand for the product outstrips the supply. Current shortages, following other historical periods of shortage, threaten the well-being of patients dependant on these products and incur heavy costs on health systems. In Italy, the national blood system, which is based on voluntary unpaid donors, reflects a policy of national self-sufficiency in blood-derived therapies (a strategic objective of the national blood system itself), based on solidarity as an ethical principle. This system has increased the collection of plasma for fractionation by 3.8% per annum over 2008-2017, in accordance to a plan for plasma procurement targeting a collection rate of 14.1 L of plasma per thousand (103) population by 2020. Over the same period, IG usage has increased by 8.5/per annum, to 89.2 g IG/103 population. In this paper, we review the factors which, increasingly, are causing an imbalance between the global supply and demand for IG, and we assess Italy's capacity to ensure that increasing this level of independence is no longer simply an ethical, but also an economic imperative, with implications for the security of Italy's health system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31846609      PMCID: PMC6917530          DOI: 10.2450/2019.0265-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Transfus        ISSN: 1723-2007            Impact factor:   3.443


  48 in total

Review 1.  Intravenous immunoglobulin: regulatory perspectives on use and supply.

Authors:  A Farrugia; P Poulis
Journal:  Transfus Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.019

2.  Intravenous administration of human gamma-globulin.

Authors:  S BARANDUN; P KISTLER; F JEUNET; H ISLIKER
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  1962       Impact factor: 2.144

3.  ELECTROPHORESIS OF IMMUNE SERUM.

Authors:  A Tiselius; E A Kabat
Journal:  Science       Date:  1938-05-06       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Sustainability of a public system for plasma collection, contract fractionation and plasma-derived medicinal product manufacturing.

Authors:  Giuliano Grazzini; Anna Ceccarelli; Deanna Calteri; Liviana Catalano; Gabriele Calizzani; Americo Cicchetti
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 5.  Treatments for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP): an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Anne Louise Oaklander; Michael Pt Lunn; Richard Ac Hughes; Ivo N van Schaik; Chris Frost; Colin H Chalk
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-01-13

6.  Evaluating dose ratio of subcutaneous to intravenous immunoglobulin therapy among patients with primary immunodeficiency disease switching to 20% subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy.

Authors:  Girishanthy Krishnarajah; Jee-Yeon K Lehmann; Brian Ellman; Rachel H Bhak; Maral DerSarkissian; Deane Leader; Ann L Bullinger; Mei Sheng Duh
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 7.  Next-generation Fc receptor-targeting biologics for autoimmune diseases.

Authors:  Adrian W Zuercher; Rolf Spirig; Adriana Baz Morelli; Tony Rowe; Fabian Käsermann
Journal:  Autoimmun Rev       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 9.754

8.  Latent therapeutic demand model for the immunoglobulin replacement therapy of primary immune deficiency disorders in the USA.

Authors:  J S Stonebraker; J Hajjar; J S Orange
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 2.144

9.  Common variable immunodeficiency disorders: division into distinct clinical phenotypes.

Authors:  Helen Chapel; Mary Lucas; Martin Lee; Janne Bjorkander; David Webster; Bodo Grimbacher; Claire Fieschi; Vojtech Thon; Mohammad R Abedi; Lennart Hammarstrom
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Perceived Health in Patients with Primary Immune Deficiency.

Authors:  Filiz Odabasi Seeborg; Roann Seay; Marcia Boyle; John Boyle; Christopher Scalchunes; Jordan Scott Orange
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 8.317

View more
  2 in total

1.  Dealing With Immunoglobulin Shortages: A Rationalization Plan From Evidence-Based and Data Collection.

Authors:  Gerard Solís-Díez; Marta Turu-Pedrola; Marta Roig-Izquierdo; Corinne Zara; Antoni Vallano; Caridad Pontes
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-19

2.  Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on supply and use of blood for transfusion.

Authors:  Simon J Stanworth; Helen V New; Torunn O Apelseth; Susan Brunskill; Rebecca Cardigan; Carolyn Doree; Marc Germain; Mindy Goldman; Edwin Massey; Daniele Prati; Nadine Shehata; Cynthia So-Osman; Jecko Thachil
Journal:  Lancet Haematol       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 18.959

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.