Literature DB >> 21553328

The direct cost of acute hip fracture care in care home residents in the UK.

O Sahota1, N Morgan, C G Moran.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Data on the true acute care costs of hip fractures for patients admitted from care homes are limited. Detailed costing analysis was undertaken for 100 patients. Median cost was £9,429 [<euro>10,896], increasing to £14,435 [<euro>16,681], for those requiring an upgrade from residential to nursing home care. Seventy-six percent of costs were attributable to hospital bed days, and therefore, interventions targeted at reducing hospital stay may be cost effective.
INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have estimated the costs associated with hip fracture, although these vary widely, and for patients admitted from care homes, who represent a significant fracture burden, there are limited data. The primary aim of this study was to perform a detailed assessment of the direct medical costs incurred and secondly compare this to the actual remuneration received by the hospital.
METHODS: One hundred patients presenting from a care home in 2006 were randomly selected and a detailed case-note costing analysis was undertaken. This cost was then compared to the actual remuneration received by the hospital.
RESULTS: Median cost per patient episode was £9,429 [<euro>10,896] (all patients) range £4,292-162,324 [<euro>4,960-187,582] (subdivided into hospital bed day costs £7,129 [<euro>8,238], operative costs £1,323 [<euro>1,529] and investigation costs £977 [<euro>1,129]). Twenty-two percent of the patients admitted from a residential home required upgrading to a nursing home. In this group, the median length of stay was 31 days (mean 38, range 10-88) median cost £14,435 [<euro>16,681]. Average remuneration received equated to £6,222 [<euro>7,190] per patient. This represents a mean loss in income, compared to actual calculated costs of £3,207 [<euro>3,706] per patient.
CONCLUSION: The median cost was £9,429 [<euro>10,896], increasing to £14,435 [<euro>16,681], for those requiring an upgrade from residential to nursing home care at discharge. Significant cost differences were seen comparing the actual cost to remuneration received. Interventions targeted at reducing length of stay may be cost effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21553328     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1651-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  15 in total

1.  Hypovitaminosis D myopathy without biochemical signs of osteomalacic bone involvement.

Authors:  H Glerup; K Mikkelsen; L Poulsen; E Hass; S Overbeck; H Andersen; P Charles; E F Eriksen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  The cost of treating osteoporotic fractures in the United Kingdom female population.

Authors:  P Dolan; D J Torgerson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Estimating hip fracture morbidity, mortality and costs.

Authors:  R Scott Braithwaite; Nananda F Col; John B Wong
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  The current hospital costs of treating hip fractures.

Authors:  Thomas M Lawrence; Christopher T White; Russell Wenn; Christopher G Moran
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Hip fracture: a prospective study of hospital course, complications, and costs.

Authors:  E W Campion; A M Jette; P D Cleary; B A Harris
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  The costs and effects of early discharge in the management of fractured hip.

Authors:  M G Farnworth; P Kenny; A Shiell
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 10.668

7.  Analysing stages of care in hospital stay for fractured neck of femur.

Authors:  J A Robbins; L J Donaldson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-11-03       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Cost analysis of early discharge after hip fracture.

Authors:  W Hollingworth; C Todd; M Parker; J A Roberts; R Williams
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-10-09

Review 9.  Fall prevention with supplemental and active forms of vitamin D: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  H A Bischoff-Ferrari; B Dawson-Hughes; H B Staehelin; J E Orav; A E Stuck; R Theiler; J B Wong; A Egli; D P Kiel; J Henschkowski
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-10-01

10.  Patient level pooled analysis of 68 500 patients from seven major vitamin D fracture trials in US and Europe.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-01-12
View more
  19 in total

1.  Comparison of hospitalised trends, treatment cost and health outcomes of fall-related hip fracture for people aged ≥ 65 years living in residential aged care and the community.

Authors:  R Mitchell; B Draper; L Harvey; M Wadolowski; H Brodaty; J Close
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Vitamin D Supplementation in Tasmanian Nursing Home Residents.

Authors:  Colin M Curtain; Mackenzie Williams; Justin M Cousins; Gregory M Peterson; Tania Winzenberg
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  The burden of osteoporotic hip fractures in Portugal: costs, health related quality of life and mortality.

Authors:  A Marques; Ó Lourenço; J A P da Silva
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Regional anesthesia as compared with general anesthesia for surgery in geriatric patients with hip fracture: does it decrease morbidity, mortality, and health care costs? Results of a single-centered study.

Authors:  Linda Le-Wendling; Azra Bihorac; Tezcan Ozrazgat Baslanti; Stephen Lucas; Kalia Sadasivan; Adam Wendling; H James Heyman; Andre Boezaart
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 3.750

5.  [Evaluation of a simple screening tool for ambulant fall prevention].

Authors:  M Knobe; P Rasche; L Rentemeister; C Bliemel; B Bücking; L C Bollheimer; H-C Pape
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  External validation of the discharge of hip fracture patients score.

Authors:  Anne J H Vochteloo; Elvira R Flikweert; Wim E Tuinebreijer; Andrea B Maier; Rolf M Bloem; Peter Pilot; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Estimation of 10-year probability bone fracture in a selected sample of Palestinian people using fracture risk assessment tool.

Authors:  Mai B Aker; Adham S Abu Taha; Sa'ed H Zyoud; Ansam F Sawalha; Samah W Al-Jabi; Waleed M Sweileh
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Predicting discharge location of hip fracture patients; the new discharge of hip fracture patients score.

Authors:  Anne Jochem Hendrik Vochteloo; Wim Eduard Tuinebreijer; Andrea Britta Maier; Rob Gerardus Henricus Hubertus Nelissen; Rolf Melchior Bloem; Peter Pilot
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Risk factors for failure to return to the pre-fracture place of residence after hip fracture: a prospective longitudinal study of 444 patients.

Authors:  Anne J H Vochteloo; Sabine T van Vliet-Koppert; Andrea B Maier; Wim E Tuinebreijer; Maarten L Röling; Mark R de Vries; Rolf M Bloem; Rob G H H Nelissen; Peter Pilot
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Total hospital stay for hip fracture: measuring the variations due to pre-fracture residence, rehabilitation, complications and comorbidities.

Authors:  Anthony W Ireland; Patrick J Kelly; Robert G Cumming
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.