Literature DB >> 21553147

Evaluation of factors affecting post-treatment quality of life in oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients primarily treated with curative surgery: an exploratory study.

Raghav C Dwivedi1, Suzanne St Rose, Edward J Chisholm, Pouya Youssefi, Mohammed Sultan Ul Hassan, Afroze S Khan, Behrad Elmiyeh, Cyrus J Kerawala, Peter M Clarke, Christopher M Nutting, Peter H Rhys-Evans, Kevin J Harrington, Rehan Kazi.   

Abstract

The aim was to explore the impact of important clinico-demographic factors on the post-treatment quality of life (QOL) in surgically treated oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients. 63 consecutive follow-up oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients treated primarily with surgery were recruited. 55 patients sent the completed questionnaires and finally included in this study. QOL and important sub-domains of the QOL were assessed. Mean QOL scores (SD) were computed, level of significance was set at P < 0.05. The mean composite QOL score and standard deviation (SD) for oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients were 76.6 (15.2) and 73.4 (13.9), respectively. Patients with higher T-stage (T3 and T4) and higher overall-stage (III and IV) had lower mean QOL scores as against early T (T1 and T2) and overall early-stage (I and II); mean scores (SD) 64.3 (13.6) and 72.3 (13.8), and 76.6 (13.6) and 81.7 (14.1), respectively. Younger patients had lower mean scores (SD) than older patients; mean QOL scores (SD) 69.7 (14.0) and 79.6 (SD), respectively. Patients with reconstruction had lower mean QOL scores as compared to those without reconstruction; mean scores (SD) 67.6 (16.0) and 77.4 (12.5), respectively. In conclusion, tumor-stage, overall-stage, age of patients, and reconstruction had a significant direct effect on the post-treatment QOL of oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21553147     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-011-1621-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  30 in total

1.  Impact of intraoral soft-tissue reconstruction on the development of quality of life after ablative surgery in patients with oral cancer.

Authors:  Henning Schliephake; Maximiliam U Jamil
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Quality of life measures in health care. I: Applications and issues in assessment.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; A Fletcher; S Gore; D Jones; D Spiegelhalter; D Cox
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-10-31

3.  Major advances in the knowledge and understanding of the epidemiology, aetiopathogenesis, diagnosis, management and prognosis of oral cancer.

Authors:  Alexander D Rapidis; Patrick Gullane; John D Langdon; Jean Louis Lefebvre; Crispian Scully; Jatin P Shah
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2009 Apr-May       Impact factor: 5.337

4.  A prospective study on quality of life of patients with cancer of the oral cavity or oropharynx treated with surgery with or without radiotherapy.

Authors:  A de Graeff; J R de Leeuw; W J Ros; G J Hordijk; G H Blijham; J A Winnubst
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.337

5.  Functional assessment using Constant's Shoulder Scale after modified radical and selective neck dissection.

Authors:  Douglas B Chepeha; Rodney J Taylor; Judith C Chepeha; Theodoros N Teknos; Carol R Bradford; Pramod K Sharma; Jeffrey E Terrell; Gregory T Wolf
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.147

6.  Global cancer statistics, 2002.

Authors:  D Max Parkin; Freddie Bray; J Ferlay; Paola Pisani
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  The University of Washington head and neck cancer measure as a predictor of outcome following primary surgery for oral cancer.

Authors:  S N Rogers; D Lowe; J S Brown; E D Vaughan
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 8.  A structured review of quality of life instruments for head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  J Ringash; A Bezjak
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.147

9.  Predictors of speech and swallowing function following primary surgery for oral and oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  A C Zuydam; D Lowe; J S Brown; E D Vaughan; S N Rogers
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.597

10.  The addition of mood and anxiety domains to the University of Washington quality of life scale.

Authors:  Simon N Rogers; Suzanne Gwanne; Derek Lowe; Gerry Humphris; Beven Yueh; Ernest A Weymuller
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.147

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of treatment- and disease-related symptoms in advanced head and neck cancer: validation of the national comprehensive cancer network-functional assessment of cancer therapy-head and neck cancer symptom index-22 (NFHNSI-22).

Authors:  Timothy P Pearman; Jennifer L Beaumont; Diane Paul; Amy P Abernethy; Paul B Jacobsen; Karen L Syrjala; Jamie Von Roenn; David Cella
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Functional Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Herbert Riechelmann; Daniel Dejaco; Teresa Bernadette Steinbichler; Anna Lettenbichler-Haug; Maria Anegg; Ute Ganswindt; Gabriele Gamerith; David Riedl
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Health-Related Quality of Life, Psychosocial Distress and Unmet Needs in Older Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Lachlan McDowell; Danny Rischin; Karla Gough; Christina Henson
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Diagnostic and therapeutic features associated with modification of quality-of-life's outcomes between one and six months after major surgery for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Margherita Gobbo; Federica Bullo; Giuseppe Perinetti; Annalisa Gatto; Giulia Ottaviani; Matteo Biasotto; Giancarlo Tirelli
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-12-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.