Literature DB >> 21553117

The influence of travel time on breast cancer characteristics, receipt of primary therapy, and surveillance mammography.

Tracy Onega1, Andrea Cook, Beth Kirlin, Xun Shi, Jennifer Alford-Teaster, Leah Tuzzio, Diana S M Buist.   

Abstract

Travel time has been shown to influence some aspects of cancer characteristics at diagnosis and care for women with breast cancer, but important gaps remain in our understanding of its impact. We examined the influence of travel time to the nearest radiology facility on breast cancer characteristics, treatment, and surveillance for women with early-stage invasive breast cancer. We included 1,012 women with invasive breast cancer (stages I and II) who had access to care within an integrated health care delivery system in western Washington State. The travel times to the nearest radiology facility were calculated for all the U.S. Census blocks within the study area and assigned to women based on residence at diagnosis. We collected cancer characteristics, primary and adjuvant therapies, and surveillance mammography for at least 2.5 years post diagnosis and used multivariable analyses to test the associations of travel time. The majority of women (68.6%) lived within 20 min of the nearest radiology facility, had stage I disease (72.7%), received breast conserving therapy (68.7%), and had annual surveillance mammography the first 2 years after treatment (73.7%). The travel time was not significantly associated with the stage or surveillance mammography after adjusting for covariates. Primary therapy was significantly related to travel time, with greater travel time (>30 min vs. ≤ 10 min) associated with a higher likelihood of mastectomy compared to breast conserving surgery (RR = 1.53; 95% CI, 1.16-2.01). The travel time was not associated with the stage at diagnosis or surveillance mammography receipt. The travel time does seem to influence the type of primary therapy among women with breast cancer, suggesting that women may prefer low frequency services, such as mastectomy, if geographic access to a radiology facility is limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21553117      PMCID: PMC3786215          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1549-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  27 in total

1.  Correlation of travel time on roads versus straight line distance.

Authors:  C S Phibbs; H S Luft
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.929

2.  Update of the NCCN guidelines for treatment of breast cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.990

3.  Recommended breast cancer surveillance guidelines. American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial.

Authors:  J A van Dongen; A C Voogd; I S Fentiman; C Legrand; R J Sylvester; D Tong; E van der Schueren; P A Helle; K van Zijl; H Bartelink
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-07-19       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Danish randomized trial comparing breast conservation therapy with mastectomy: six years of life-table analysis. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group.

Authors:  M Blichert-Toft; C Rose; J A Andersen; M Overgaard; C K Axelsson; K W Andersen; H T Mouridsen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1992

6.  An epidemiological study evaluating the relationship of distance from a tertiary care cancer center to early detection of colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Vijay K Koka; Anil Potti; Genise N Fraiman; David Hanekom; James F Hanley
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.480

7.  Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy: the National Cancer Institute Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Matthew M Poggi; David N Danforth; Linda C Sciuto; Sharon L Smith; Seth M Steinberg; David J Liewehr; Cynthia Menard; Marc E Lippman; Allen S Lichter; Rosemary M Altemus
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Bernard Fisher; Stewart Anderson; John Bryant; Richard G Margolese; Melvin Deutsch; Edwin R Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Umberto Veronesi; Natale Cascinelli; Luigi Mariani; Marco Greco; Roberto Saccozzi; Alberto Luini; Marisel Aguilar; Ettore Marubini
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Breast cancer recurrence risk in relation to antidepressant use after diagnosis.

Authors:  Jessica Chubak; Diana S M Buist; Denise M Boudreau; Mary Anne Rossing; Thomas Lumley; Noel S Weiss
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Geographic Access to Mammography and Its Relationship to Breast Cancer Screening and Stage at Diagnosis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jenna A Khan-Gates; Jennifer L Ersek; Jan M Eberth; Swann A Adams; Sandi L Pruitt
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2015-07-26

2.  Differences in Physician Referral Drive Disparities in Surgical Intervention for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Alexis P Chidi; Cindy L Bryce; Larissa Myaskovsky; Michael J Fine; David A Geller; Douglas P Landsittel; Allan Tsung
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Geospatial approaches to cancer control and population sciences at the United States cancer centers.

Authors:  Robert W Korycinski; Bethany L Tennant; Michelle A Cawley; Bonny Bloodgood; April Y Oh; David Berrigan
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Geographic access to mammography facilities and frequency of mammography screening.

Authors:  Patricia I Jewett; Ronald E Gangnon; Elena Elkin; John M Hampton; Elizabeth A Jacobs; Kristen Malecki; James LaGro; Polly A Newcomb; Amy Trentham-Dietz
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  Travel by public transit to mammography facilities in 6 US urban areas.

Authors:  S Graham; B Lewis; B Flanagan; M Watson; L Peipins
Journal:  J Transp Health       Date:  2015-12

6.  Breast cancer screening outreach effectiveness: Mammogram-specific reminders vs. comprehensive preventive services birthday letters.

Authors:  Diana S M Buist; Hongyuan Gao; Melissa L Anderson; Tracy Onega; Susan Brandzel; Melissa A Rabelhofer; Susan Carol Bradford; Erin J Aiello Bowles
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  The role of spatially-derived access-to-care characteristics in melanoma prevention and control in Los Angeles county.

Authors:  Loraine A Escobedo; Ashley Crew; Ariana Eginli; David Peng; Michael R Cousineau; Myles Cockburn
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 4.078

8.  Association Between Geographic Access to Cancer Care and Receipt of Radiation Therapy for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Chun Chieh Lin; Suanna S Bruinooge; M Kelsey Kirkwood; Dawn L Hershman; Ahmedin Jemal; B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; James B Yu; Shane Hopkins; Michael Goldstein; Dean Bajorin; Sharon H Giordano; Michael Kosty; Anna Arnone; Amy Hanley; Stephanie Stevens; Christine Olsen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Travel Burden to Breast MRI and Utilization: Are Risk and Sociodemographics Related?

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Christoph I Lee; David Benkeser; Jennifer Alford-Teaster; Jennifer S Haas; Anna N A Tosteson; Deirdre Hill; Xun Shi; Louise M Henderson; Rebecca A Hubbard
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 5.532

10.  Geographic access to breast imaging for US women.

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Rebecca Hubbard; Deirdre Hill; Christoph I Lee; Jennifer S Haas; Heather A Carlos; Jennifer Alford-Teaster; Andy Bogart; Wendy B DeMartini; Karla Kerlikowske; Beth A Virnig; Diana S M Buist; Louise Henderson; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 5.532

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.