| Literature DB >> 21552676 |
Marcelo Perim Baldo1, Divanei Zaniqueli, Ludimila Forechi, Rebeca Caldeira Machado, Sérgio Lamêgo Rodrigues, José Geraldo Mill.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of spironolactone on ventricular stiffness in spontaneously hypertensive adult rats subjected to high salt intake.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21552676 PMCID: PMC3072011 DOI: 10.1590/s1807-59322011000300020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 1807-5932 Impact factor: 2.365
Morphometric parameters measured after eight weeks of treatment.
| Wistar | SHR | SHR-Salt | SHR-Salt-S | |
| 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | |
| 1.42±0.03 | 1.14±0.03 | 1.24±0.03 | 1.15±0.02 | |
| 2.90±0.06 | 3.44±0.07 | 3.68±0.07 | 3.46±0.05 | |
| 3.10±0.09 | 2.59±0.10 | 2.62±0.11 | 2.72±0.10 | |
| 6.10±0.2 | 7.85±0.3 | 7.64±0.3 | 8.21±0.3 | |
| 80.8±0.3 | 81.2±0.3 | 80.4±0.4 | 80.3±0.3 | |
| 2.91±0.06 | 2.52±0.05 | 2.61±0.05 | 2.56±0.04 | |
| 6.71±0.11 | 7.65±0.12 | 7.61±0.06 | 7.72±0.09 |
Data are presented as the mean±SEM
P<0.05 vs Wistar; † P<0.05 vs SHR; ‡ P<0.05 vs SHR-Salt
Hemodynamic parameters observed in anesthetized animals after eight weeks of treatment.
| Wistar | SHR | SHR-Salt | SHR-Salt-S | |
| 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | |
| 192±8 | 190±7 | 183±7 | 187±7 | |
| 109±2 | 118±2* | 117±2* | 116±2* | |
| 76±3 | 79±2 | 75±3 | 77±2 | |
| 113±2 | 121±2* | 123±2* | 119±2* | |
| 4.1±0.3 | 6.3±0.3* | 6.8±0.6* | 6.6±0.5* | |
| 4854±101 | 4794±86 | 4737±103 | 4536±114 | |
| -3698±92 | -3729±125 | -3342±80 | -3647±104 |
Data are presented as the mean±SEM. * P<0.05 vs Wistar; † P<0.05 vs SHR; ‡ P<0.05 vs SHR-Salt
HR: heart rate, SBP: systolic blood pressure, DBP: diastolic blood pressure, LVSP: left ventricular systolic pressure, LVEDP: left ventricular end-diastolic pressrue, dP/dt: maximum rate of pressure rise and fall.
Figure 1Left ventricular in situ pressure-volume curve normalized for body weight (A). The chamber dilatation was obtained from the first segment (0 to 5 mmHg) of the curve (B). The chamber stiffness was obtained from the second segment (5 to 30 mmHg) of the curve (C) when plotted on a log scale. Data are presented as the mean±SEM. * P<0.05 vs Wistar; † P<0.05 vs SHR; ‡ P<0.05 vs SHR-Salt