| Literature DB >> 21552474 |
Maria Garcia-Hoyos1, Carmen Laura Auz-Alexandre, Berta Almoguera, Diego Cantalapiedra, Rosa Riveiro-Alvarez, Miguel Angel Lopez-Martinez, Ascension Gimenez, Fiona Blanco-Kelly, Almudena Avila-Fernandez, Maria Jose Trujillo-Tiebas, Blanca Garcia-Sandoval, Carmen Ramos, Carmen Ayuso.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Heterozygous mutations around codon 838 of the guanylate cyclase 2D (GUCY2D) gene have recently been associated with more than a third of autosomal dominant macular dystrophy patients. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prevalence of these mutations in Spanish families with autosomal dominant cone, cone-rod, and macular dystrophies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21552474 PMCID: PMC3087450
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Vis ISSN: 1090-0535 Impact factor: 2.367
Figure 1Reported mutations in a fragment of the primary structure of the retinal guanylyl cyclase-1 (RetGC-1) protein, encoded by exon 13 of Guanylate Cyclase 2D (GUCY2D). This figure shows the different mutations that have been previously described in codons 837, 838, and 839 of the GUCY2D gene. The asterisk indicates the novel p.Arg838Pro mutation described in this manuscript. The shadowed area corresponds to the Hemophilus hemolyticus (HhaI) recognition site.
Figure 2Figure shows a map of the CORD6 region. Distance between markers and the locus CORD6 are indicated in bp.
Figure 3Results of the haplotype analysis performed in a family with the p.R838P mutation in Guanylate Cyclase 2D (GUCY2D). The figure also shows the status of genotyped individuals for mutation p.R838P, where “+” is used for normal alleles and “–” is used for mutated alleles.
Figure 4A heterozygous mutation (Guanine-to-Citosine; G>C) results in an arginine-to-proline mutation at codon 838 of the Guanylate Cyclase 2D (GUCY2D) gene.
Clinical features of the families with the p.R838P mutation in GUCY2D.
| II:1 | 70 | 0.01/0.01 | Macular degeneration | +++ | Normal | + |
| II: 3 | 61 | 0.3/0.2 | Macular degeneration | N/A | Normal | + |
| II:4 | 59 | 0.01/0.01 | Macular degeneration Salt-and-pepper fundus appearance in the posterior pole | ++ | Normal | + |
| III:2 | 35 | 0.2/0.2 | Tapetoretinal degeneration
Salt-and-pepper fundus appearance | ++ | Normal | + |
| III:5 | 28 | 0.3/0.1 | Discreet salt-and-pepper fundus appearance | ++ | Normal | + |
| IV:1 | 21 | N/A | Salt-and-pepper fundus appearance | ++ | Normal | + |
| IV:2 | 15 | 0.1/0.1 | Poorly distinguishable macula | + | Normal | + |
Figure 5Fundus photograph of five different patients of the families with p.R838P mutation in GUCY2D. Older patients had a more severe phenotype compared to the younger generation, and to the Goldmann kinetic perimetric fields of patients III:5 and IV:2. Fundus description for these five patients has been summarized in Table 1.