Csilla H Lazar1, Mousumi Mutsuddi2, Adva Kimchi3, Lina Zelinger4, Liliana Mizrahi-Meissonnier3, Devorah Marks-Ohana3, Alexis Boleda5, Rinki Ratnapriya5, Dror Sharon3, Anand Swaroop5, Eyal Banin4. 1. Neurobiology-Neurodegeneration & Repair Laboratory, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States Molecular Biology Center, Interdisciplinary Research Institute on Bio-Nano Sciences, Babes-Bolyai-University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. 2. Neurobiology-Neurodegeneration & Repair Laboratory, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. 4. Neurobiology-Neurodegeneration & Repair Laboratory, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. 5. Neurobiology-Neurodegeneration & Repair Laboratory, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The Israeli population has a unique genetic make-up, with a high prevalence of consanguineous marriages and autosomal recessive diseases. In rod-dominated phenotypes, disease-causing genes and mutations that differ from those identified in other populations often are incurred. We used whole exome sequencing (WES) to identify genetic defects in Israeli families with cone-dominated retinal phenotypes. METHODS: Clinical analysis included family history, detailed ocular examination, visual function testing, and retinal imaging. Whole exome sequencing, followed by segregation analysis, was performed in 6 cone-dominated retinopathy families in which prior mutation analysis did not reveal the causative gene. Based on the WES findings, we screened 106 additional families with cone-dominated phenotypes. RESULTS: The WES analysis revealed mutations in known retinopathy genes in five of the six families: two pathogenic mutations in the GUCY2D gene in three families, and one each in CDHR1 and C8orf37. Targeted screening of additional cone-dominated families led to identification of GUCY2D mutations in four other families, which included two highly probable novel disease-causing variants. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggested that GUCY2D is a major cause of autosomal dominant cone and cone-rod dystrophies in Israel; this is similar to other Caucasian populations and is in contrast with retinitis pigmentosa (primary rod disease), where the genetic make-up of the Israeli population is distinct from other ethnic groups. We also conclude that WES permits more comprehensive and rapid analyses that can be followed by targeted screens of larger samples to delineate the genetic structure of retinal disease in unique population cohorts. Copyright 2015 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
PURPOSE: The Israeli population has a unique genetic make-up, with a high prevalence of consanguineous marriages and autosomal recessive diseases. In rod-dominated phenotypes, disease-causing genes and mutations that differ from those identified in other populations often are incurred. We used whole exome sequencing (WES) to identify genetic defects in Israeli families with cone-dominated retinal phenotypes. METHODS: Clinical analysis included family history, detailed ocular examination, visual function testing, and retinal imaging. Whole exome sequencing, followed by segregation analysis, was performed in 6 cone-dominated retinopathy families in which prior mutation analysis did not reveal the causative gene. Based on the WES findings, we screened 106 additional families with cone-dominated phenotypes. RESULTS: The WES analysis revealed mutations in known retinopathy genes in five of the six families: two pathogenic mutations in the GUCY2D gene in three families, and one each in CDHR1 and C8orf37. Targeted screening of additional cone-dominated families led to identification of GUCY2D mutations in four other families, which included two highly probable novel disease-causing variants. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggested that GUCY2D is a major cause of autosomal dominant cone and cone-rod dystrophies in Israel; this is similar to other Caucasian populations and is in contrast with retinitis pigmentosa (primary rod disease), where the genetic make-up of the Israeli population is distinct from other ethnic groups. We also conclude that WES permits more comprehensive and rapid analyses that can be followed by targeted screens of larger samples to delineate the genetic structure of retinal disease in unique population cohorts. Copyright 2015 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
Entities:
Keywords:
inherited blindness; next generation sequencing; photoreceptor degeneration
Authors: Panagiotis I Sergouniotis; Christina Chakarova; Cian Murphy; Mirjana Becker; Eva Lenassi; Gavin Arno; Monkol Lek; Daniel G MacArthur; Shomi S Bhattacharya; Anthony T Moore; Graham E Holder; Anthony G Robson; Uwe Wolfrum; Andrew R Webster; Vincent Plagnol Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2014-05-01 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Eyal Banin; Dikla Bandah-Rozenfeld; Alexey Obolensky; Artur V Cideciyan; Tomas S Aleman; Devora Marks-Ohana; Malka Sela; Sanford Boye; Alexander Sumaroka; Alejandro J Roman; Sharon B Schwartz; William W Hauswirth; Samuel G Jacobson; Itzhak Hemo; Dror Sharon Journal: Hum Gene Ther Date: 2010-11-03 Impact factor: 5.695
Authors: Veronique B D Kitiratschky; Robert Wilke; Agnes B Renner; Ulrich Kellner; Maria Vadalà; David G Birch; Bernd Wissinger; Eberhart Zrenner; Susanne Kohl Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-05-16 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Ramon A C van Huet; Alejandro Estrada-Cuzcano; Eyal Banin; Ygal Rotenstreich; Stephanie Hipp; Susanne Kohl; Carel B Hoyng; Anneke I den Hollander; Rob W J Collin; B Jeroen Klevering Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-07-12 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Ali S Sharif; Dongmei Yu; Stuart Loertscher; Richard Austin; Kevin Nguyen; Pranav D Mathur; Anna M Clark; Junhuang Zou; Ekaterina S Lobanova; Vadim Y Arshavsky; Jun Yang Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2018-02-13 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Elise Heon; Gunhee Kim; Sophie Qin; Janelle E Garrison; Erika Tavares; Ajoy Vincent; Nina Nuangchamnong; C Anthony Scott; Diane C Slusarski; Val C Sheffield Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2016-03-22 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Zeinab Ravesh; Mohammed E El Asrag; Nicole Weisschuh; Martin McKibbin; Peggy Reuter; Christopher M Watson; Britta Baumann; James A Poulter; Sundus Sajid; Evangelia S Panagiotou; James O'Sullivan; Zakia Abdelhamed; Michael Bonin; Mehdi Soltanifar; Graeme C M Black; Muhammad Amin-ud Din; Carmel Toomes; Muhammad Ansar; Chris F Inglehearn; Bernd Wissinger; Manir Ali Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2015-03-07 Impact factor: 2.367
Authors: Lisa Roberts; Rinki Ratnapriya; Morné du Plessis; Vijender Chaitankar; Raj S Ramesar; Anand Swaroop Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Frederick T Collison; Gerald A Fishman; Takayuki Nagasaki; Jana Zernant; J Jason McAnany; Jason C Park; Rando Allikmets Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 4.799