Literature DB >> 21551475

Rate responsive pacing using cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with chronotropic incompetence and chronic heart failure.

Daniel B Sims1, Andrea Mignatti, Paolo C Colombo, Nir Uriel, Luis I Garcia, Frederick A Ehlert, Ulrich P Jorde.   

Abstract

AIMS: Chronotropic incompetence (CI) is a common finding in patients with advanced chronic heart failure (CHF) and is associated with a worse functional capacity. Whether rate responsive pacing with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) would acutely improve exercise performance in patients with advanced CHF and severe CI (<70% age-predicted maximum heart rate) is unknown. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients (n = 13) with CHF, a CRT device, and severe CI were randomized in a double-blind crossover pilot study to either DDD (control) or DDDR (rate responsive) pacing. Six minutes walk test (6MWT) distance, oxygen consumption at anaerobic threshold (VO(2) @ AT), and maximal oxygen consumption (VO(2) max) were measured. One week later, testing was repeated in the alternate pacing mode. Rate responsive pacing commenced with standard settings in only 9 of 13 (69%) patients. In these 9 subjects, 6MWT distance improved acutely from 358.5 ± 40.7 to 376.8 ± 24.5 m with DDDR pacing (P< 0.05). VO(2) max did not improve with DDDR pacing (14.0 ± 3.2 mL/kg/min) compared with DDD pacing (13.9 ± 3.0 mL/kg/min; P= 0.69). VO(2) @ AT tended towards improvement with DDDR pacing (10.8 ± 2.9 mL/kg/min) compared with DDD pacing (9.6 ± 1.8 mL/kg/min; P= 0.29). There was a linear relationship between the increase in heart rate at minute 3 during rate responsive pacing and improvement in VO(2) @ AT (r = 0.83, P< 0.05).
CONCLUSION: When rate responsive pacing using a CRT device is achieved in patients with advanced CHF and severe CI, parameters of aerobic exercise performance improve acutely. Routine exercise testing to ensure successful restoration of heart rate response may be beneficial to optimize CRT settings in this patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21551475     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eur127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  10 in total

Review 1.  Chronotropic Incompetence During Exercise in Type 2 Diabetes: Aetiology, Assessment Methodology, Prognostic Impact and Therapy.

Authors:  Charly Keytsman; Paul Dendale; Dominique Hansen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy update: evolving indications, expanding benefit?

Authors:  C Butcher; Y Mareev; V Markides; M Mason; T Wong; J G F Cleland
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Rate adaptive pacing in people with chronic heart failure increases peak heart rate but not peak exercise capacity: a systematic review.

Authors:  H I Clark; M J Pearson; N A Smart
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  Atrial fibrillation-induced tachycardiomyopathy and heart failure: an underappreciated and elusive condition.

Authors:  Antonis S Manolis; Theodora A Manolis; Antonis A Manolis; Helen Melita
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Atrioventricular Nodal Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Complicating Congestive Heart Failure.

Authors:  Osmar Antonio Centurión; Karina Elizabeth Scavenius; Laura B García; Luis Miño; Judith Torales; Orlando Sequeira
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2018-06-30

Review 6.  Relationships among norepinephrine levels, exercise capacity, and chronotropic responses in heart failure patients.

Authors:  Liza Grosman-Rimon; Evan Wright; Solomon Sabovich; Jordan Rimon; Sagi Gleitman; Doron Sudarsky; Alla Lubovich; Itzhak Gabizon; Spencer D Lalonde; Sharon Tsuk; Michael A McDonald; Vivek Rao; David Gutterman; Ulrich P Jorde; Shemy Carasso; Erez Kachel
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.214

7.  Chronotropic incompetence in Chagas disease: usefulness of dual sensor pacemaker based on volume minute and accelerometer.

Authors:  José Carlos Pachón
Journal:  Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

8.  2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing.

Authors:  Bruce L Wilkoff; Laurent Fauchier; Martin K Stiles; Carlos A Morillo; Sana M Al-Khatib; Jesœs Almendral; Luis Aguinaga; Ronald D Berger; Alejandro Cuesta; James P Daubert; Sergio Dubner; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; N A Mark Estes; Guilherme Fenelon; Fermin C Garcia; Maurizio Gasparini; David E Haines; Jeff S Healey; Jodie L Hurtwitz; Roberto Keegan; Christof Kolb; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Germanas Marinskis; Martino Martinelli; Mark McGuire; Luis G Molina; Ken Okumura; Alessandro Proclemer; Andrea M Russo; Jagmeet P Singh; Charles D Swerdlow; Wee Siong Teo; William Uribe; Sami Viskin; Chun-Chieh Wang; Shu Zhang
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2016-02-01

9.  Optimal Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pacing Rate in Non-Ischemic Heart Failure Patients: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Trial.

Authors:  Adam Ali Ghotbi; Mikael Sander; Lars Køber; Berit Th Philbert; Finn Gustafsson; Christoffer Hagemann; Andreas Kjær; Peter K Jacobsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Impact of closed loop stimulation on prognostic cardiopulmonary variables in patients with chronic heart failure and severe chronotropic incompetence: a pilot, randomized, crossover study.

Authors:  Joachim Proff; Béla Merkely; Roland Papp; Corinna Lenz; Peter Nordbeck; Christian Butter; Juergen Meyerhoefer; Michael Doering; Dean J MacCarter; Katharina Ingel; Thomas Thouet; Ulf Landmesser; Mattias J Roser
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 5.214

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.