| Literature DB >> 21551190 |
Karen Fitzmaurice1, Danijela Petrovic, Narayan Ramamurthy, Ruth Simmons, Shazma Merani, Silvana Gaudieri, Stuart Sims, Eugene Dempsey, Elizabeth Freitas, Susan Lea, Susan McKiernan, Suzanne Norris, Aideen Long, Dermot Kelleher, Paul Klenerman.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: CD8 T cells are central to the control of hepatitis C virus (HCV) although the key features of a successful CD8 T cell response remain to be defined. In a cohort of Irish women infected by a single source, a strong association between viral clearance and the human lecucocyte (HLA)-A*03 allele has been described, and the aim of this study was to define the protective nature of the associated CD8 T cell response.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21551190 PMCID: PMC3184218 DOI: 10.1136/gut.2010.228403
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gut ISSN: 0017-5749 Impact factor: 23.059
Details of HLA and HCV RNA status of HLA-A*03-positive patients included in the study
| Patient no.* | HLA class I | HLA class II | HCV RNA status | A*03 assays (tetramer frequency %) | Sequence |
| 15 | A*03,03,B*07,44, C*07,16 | DR*1501,1302 DQ*0602,0609 | PCR+ | Culture (neg) | TVYHGAGSK |
| 1537 | A*01,03,B*07,08 C*07,08 | DR*1501, 1501, DQ*0602, 0602 | PCR+ | TVYHGAGAR | |
| 39 | A*01,03,B*37,57, C*06,06 | DR*0701,0101, DQ*0501,3032 | PCR+ | TVYHGAGAR | |
| 1543 | A*03,24,B*35,51, C*04,17 | DR*0407,1601, DQ*0301,0501 | PCR+ | TVYHGAGAR | |
| 77 | A*01,03,B*07,08, C*07,07 | DR*3011,1501, DQ*0201,0602 | PCR+ | TVYHGAGAR | |
| 60 | A*02,03,B*07,44, C*05,07 | DR*4048,4013, DQ*0301,0302 | PCR −ve (Treated) | Culture (14.1%) | TVYHGAGTR |
| 1548 | A*02,03,B*14,18, C*07,08 | DR*401,1104, DQ*0301,0301 | PCR+ | TVYHGAGAR | |
| 1549 | A03,23,B*07,47, C*04,07 | DR701,1501, DQ*0202,0602 | PCR+ | TVYHGAGAR | |
| 1552 | A*03,30,B*17,18, C*05,07 | DR*3011,1501, DQ*0201,0602 | PCR+ | TVYHGAGTK | |
| 1562 | A*03,30,B*13,44, C*06,16 | DR*0701,0701, DQ*0202,0202 | PCR+ | XXYHGAGTR | |
| 1571 | A*02,03,B*14,57, C*08,10 | DR*1501,1301, DQ*0602,0603 | PCR+ | TVYHGAGTK | |
| 1587 | A*02,03,B*14,57, C*06,08 | DR*0701,1303, DQ*0301,3023 | PCR+ | TVYHGAGTR | |
| 106 | A*01,03,B*14,37, C*06,08 | DR*0401,1201, DQ*0301,0609 | SR | Culture (3.9%) | – |
| 49 | A*03,68,B*07,15, C*06,07 | DR*3011,0701, DQ*0602,0302 | SR | Culture (6.8%), Elispot | – |
| 29 | A*01,03,B*07,57, C*06,07 | DR*3011,0701, DQ*0201,3032 | SR | Culture (4.4%), Elispot | – |
| 113 | A*01,03,B*07,08, C*07,08 | DR*1501,1501, DQ*0602,0602 | PCR+ | Culture (neg) | – |
| 105 | A*03,26,B*27,49, C*01,07 | DR*101,1101, DQ*0301,0501 | SR | Culture (neg) | – |
| 102 | A*02,03,B*14,44,C*05,08 | DR*0101,0404, DQ*0501,0302 | SR | Culture (neg) | – |
| 110 | A*02,03,B*14,44, C*05,08 | DR*0401,0101, DQ*0301,0302 | SR | Culture (2.83%) | – |
| 109 | A*02,03,B*07,44, C*05,07 | DR*0401,0401, DQ*0301,0302 | SR | Culture (1.36%) | – |
| 40 | A*02,03,B*14,60, C*08,10 | DR*1501,1501, DQ*0602,0602 | SR | Elispot | – |
| 42 | A*01,03,B*07,57, C*06,07 | DR*1501101, DQ*0602,0501 | SR | Elispot | – |
| 50 | A*02,03,B*07,44, C*05,07 | DR*1501101, DQ*0602,0501 | SR | Elispot | – |
| 52 | A*01,03,B*07,07, C*07,07 | DR*0101,0404, DQ*0501,0302 | SR | Elispot |
HCV, hepatitis C virus; HLA, human leucocyte antigen; SR, spontaneous resolver. Class II alleles are DRB1 or DQB1.
Figure 1Magnitude of CD8 T cell responses as determined by ex vivo interferon γ ELISpot. HCV-specific CD8 T cell responses are absent ex vivo in all patients. (A) HLA-A*03-positive patients, n=6. All patients had spontaneously resolved infection. (B) HLA-A*02-positive patients, n=17 (6 patients had spontaneous resolved infection and 11 had persistent infection. (C) Whole genome assay in HLA diverse individuals, n=8 (4 spontaneous resolvers and 4 persistently infected). Responses are presented as the mean of duplicate wells after substraction of background. Summation of spot-forming units (SFU) is expressed per 1×106 peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). CMV, cytomegalovis, EBV, Epstein–Barr virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HLA, human leucocyte antigen; PHA, phyto-haemagglutinin.
Figure 2CD8 T cell responses to HLA-A*02-restricted epitopes in cultured lines. (A) Group data. (B) Representative dot plots of the CD8 T cell responses to the NS3 1073–81 epitope (CVNGVCWTV or CINGVCWTV) in two patients with resolved infection (patient 107 and 60). (C) Representative dot plots of tetramer responses to HLA-A*02-restricted control EBV and CMV epitopes. CMV, cytomegalovis, EBV, Epstein–Barr virus; HLA, human leucocyte antigen.
Figure 3Two HLA-A*03 ‘footprints’ in predicted hepatitis C virus epitopes. Significant sequence variation is seen in the NS3 1080–88 TVYHGAGTK epitope. Lysine (K) is substituted with arginine (R) at position 9 (K1088R) in 9/12 patients (75%) in the A*03-positive group compared with 1/33 (3%) in the control group, p<0.0003. Furthermore, the threonine (T) at position 8 is frequently substituted with alanine (A) (T1087A) in 6/12 (50%) HLA-A*03-positive patients compared with A*03-negative patients (2/33, 6%), p=0.01. The double substitution TK1087AR is also observed in a significant number of HLA A*03-positive patients (50%) compared with controls (3%), p=0.004. A second HLA-A*03 ‘footprint’ is also present in the hepatitis C virus NS5B protein. Significant sequence variation in seen in the NS5B 2510–18 KLTPPHSAK epitope. Lysine (K) is substituted with arginine (R) at position 9 (K2518R) in 8/15 (53%) in the A*03-positive group compared with 2/45 (4%) in the control group (p=0.001). Lysine (K) is also substituted with methionine (M) in both groups. Its association with HLA-A*03 is not significant (p=0.2). X indicates no sequence available. Statistical comparison by the Fisher exact test. HLA, human leucocyte antigen.
Figure 4CD8 T cell responses to the HLA-A*03-restricted ‘footprint’ epitope NS3 1080–88 in cultured cell lines. (A) Overall data set; n=10 (seven patients had spontaneously resolved infection, one patient resolved with antiviral therapy and two patients had chronic infection) (B) Representative dot plots showing tetramer responses to the NS3 1080–88 epitope in two patients (both resolvers) (C) Dot plots demonstrating tetramer responses to the HLA-A*03-restricted control EBV epitopes. EBV, Epstein–Barr virus; HLA, human leucocyte antigen.
Figure 5Immune escape by selected peptides in NS3 1080–88. (A) Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from three patients with resolved infection were cultured in the presence of the NS3 1080–88 peptide TVYHGAGTK. They were then re-stimulated with the wild-type NS3 TVYHGAGTK or the escape mutant (TVYHGAGTR and TVYHGAGAR) peptides (10 μg/ml final concentration). The ability to secrete interferon γ (IFNγ) was analysed by intra-cellular cytokine staining (ICS). A significant reduction in IFNγ secretion was observed in lines stimulated with the mutant peptides TVYHGAGTR and TVYHGAGAR, *p=0.04 (Student t test). (B) A peptide titration for the wild type and the escape mutants was performed on subject 49. The peptide concentration is presented as μg/ml. (C) The predicted binding ability of the wild-type and variant peptides identified in two bio-informatic programs (NetMHC and BIMAS). The lysine to arginine substitution at position 9 causes a significant reduction in the predicted binding ability. The NetMHC program relies on artificial neural networks which are capable of performing sensitive, quantitative predictions of peptide binding to the MHC (major histocompatibility complex) class I molecules. These systems have been designed to predict binding versus non-binding peptides, and their binding abilities are presented as an estimated affinity in nM.
Figure 6Variant peptides fail to stimulate NS3 1080–88-specific CD8 T cells. Antigen-specific lines were generated in response to the wild-type (WT) peptide (TVYHGAGTK) or variants that contained either a single mutation (TVYHGAGAK or TVYHGAGTR) or the double mutation (TVYHGAGAR). (A) The lysine (K) to arginine (R) mutation at position 9 (TVYHGAGTR) and (TVYHGAGAR) caused a significant reduction in the binding of the WT tetramer (p=0.03), while the threonine (T) to alanine (A) change alone (TVYHGAGAK) led to a reduction in binding in four patients (p=ns). (B) Results after normalisation of the WT (TK-specific) cells to 100%. (C) Representative dot plots (patient 29) are shown.
Figure 7The percentage replication efficiency of mutants compared with the wild type (TK). Representative time course of mutants TR and AR compared with the wild type (TK) and the negative mutant (GND) at 48 and 72 h. Replicative capacity is expressed as a percentage after normalisation to the 4 h input RNA value (reflecting transfection efficiency). Wild-type (TK) was normalised to 100%. The mean±SD of three independent experiments is shown. Replication efficiency of the mutant TR is significantly reduced at both time points while the AR mutant replicates almost to wild-type levels, indicating a compensatory role. Student t test was used for statistical analysis.