PURPOSE: To evaluate the damage caused by microwave ablation to vessels inside and outside the ablation zone in an in vivo swine model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four pigs underwent microwave liver ablation with a 2.45-GHz generator and a 14-gauge water-cooled antenna with a miniature choke. Each animal underwent four 15-minute microwave ablations (two at 40 W, two at 60 W). Mean minimum and maximum diameters of ablation areas were calculated on gross pathologic and histologic examination. At minimum, a whole-mount section and two to four specimens were obtained from each ablation and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Specimens were analyzed to verify the presence of damaged vessels in and outside the ablation area. RESULTS: Mean ablation diameters at gross pathologic examination, including the hemorrhagic halo, were 3.1 cm ± 0.5 at 40 W and 3.6 cm ± 1.1 at 60 W. All ablation zones presented a characteristic pattern consisting of three concentric zones: (i) a central area consisting of coagulative necrosis (mean maximum diameter, 8.5 mm ± 2.6), (ii) a larger area characterized by irreversibly damaged hepatocytes (mean maximum thickness, 11.7 mm ± 3.4), and (iii) a hemorrhagic halo. Twenty-one veins outside the ablation zone were evaluated (mean diameter, 5.6 mm), three of which (14%) showed diffuse endothelial damage. All three represented a continuation of a portal vein within the ablation area. CONCLUSIONS: In a small percentage of microwave ablation cases, endothelial damage can extend from a portal vessel included in the ablation zone to a segment of the vessel situated outside the ablation zone. Further investigation of the clinical significance of this finding is needed.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the damage caused by microwave ablation to vessels inside and outside the ablation zone in an in vivo swine model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four pigs underwent microwave liver ablation with a 2.45-GHz generator and a 14-gauge water-cooled antenna with a miniature choke. Each animal underwent four 15-minute microwave ablations (two at 40 W, two at 60 W). Mean minimum and maximum diameters of ablation areas were calculated on gross pathologic and histologic examination. At minimum, a whole-mount section and two to four specimens were obtained from each ablation and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Specimens were analyzed to verify the presence of damaged vessels in and outside the ablation area. RESULTS: Mean ablation diameters at gross pathologic examination, including the hemorrhagic halo, were 3.1 cm ± 0.5 at 40 W and 3.6 cm ± 1.1 at 60 W. All ablation zones presented a characteristic pattern consisting of three concentric zones: (i) a central area consisting of coagulative necrosis (mean maximum diameter, 8.5 mm ± 2.6), (ii) a larger area characterized by irreversibly damaged hepatocytes (mean maximum thickness, 11.7 mm ± 3.4), and (iii) a hemorrhagic halo. Twenty-one veins outside the ablation zone were evaluated (mean diameter, 5.6 mm), three of which (14%) showed diffuse endothelial damage. All three represented a continuation of a portal vein within the ablation area. CONCLUSIONS: In a small percentage of microwave ablation cases, endothelial damage can extend from a portal vessel included in the ablation zone to a segment of the vessel situated outside the ablation zone. Further investigation of the clinical significance of this finding is needed.
Authors: Maria Franca Meloni; Jason Chiang; Paul F Laeseke; Christoph F Dietrich; Angela Sannino; Marco Solbiati; Elisabetta Nocerino; Christopher L Brace; Fred T Lee Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2016-08-02 Impact factor: 3.914
Authors: Jason Chiang; Michael Loecher; Kevin Moulin; M Franca Meloni; Steven S Raman; Justin P McWilliams; Daniel B Ennis; Edward W Lee Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2020-03-13 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Jason Chiang; Mircea Cristescu; Matthew H Lee; Anna Moreland; J Louis Hinshaw; Fred T Lee; Christopher L Brace Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Marco Dollinger; René Müller-Wille; Florian Zeman; Michael Haimerl; Christoph Niessen; Lukas P Beyer; Sven A Lang; Andreas Teufel; Christian Stroszczynski; Philipp Wiggermann Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: W Bäumler; M Sebald; I Einspieler; P Wiggermann; A Schicho; J Schaible; L Lürken; M Dollinger; C Stroszczynski; L P Beyer Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-12-27 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Wolf Bäumler; Andreas Schicho; Jan Schaible; Niklas Verloh; Karin Senk; Phillip Wiggermann; Christian Stroszczynski; Lukas Phillip Beyer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-11-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Wolf Bäumler; Philipp Wiggermann; Lukas Lürken; Marco Dollinger; Christian Stroszczynski; Lukas P Beyer; Andreas Schicho Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-03-30 Impact factor: 6.639