Literature DB >> 21550351

Competitive helping increases with the size of biological markets and invades defection.

Pat Barclay1.   

Abstract

Cooperation between unrelated individuals remains a puzzle in evolutionary biology. Recent work indicates that partner choice can select for high levels of helping. More generally, helping can be seen as but one strategy used to compete for partners within a broader biological market, yet giving within such markets has received little mathematical investigation. In the present model, individuals help others to attract attention from them and thus receive a larger share of any help actively or passively provided by those others. The evolutionarily stable level of helping increases with the size of the biological market and the degree of partner choice. Furthermore, if individuals passively produce some no-cost help to partners, competitive helping can then invade populations of non-helpers because helpers directly benefit from increasing their access to potential partners. This framework of competitive helping demonstrates how high helping can be achieved and why different populations may differ in helping levels.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21550351     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.04.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  17 in total

1.  Solving the puzzle of collective action through inter-individual differences.

Authors:  Chris von Rueden; Sergey Gavrilets; Luke Glowacki
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Local competition sparks concerns for fairness in the ultimatum game.

Authors:  Pat Barclay; Benjamin Stoller
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Reciprocity creates a stake in one's partner, or why you should cooperate even when anonymous.

Authors:  Pat Barclay
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Multiple reputation domains and cooperative behaviour in two Latin American communities.

Authors:  Shane J Macfarlan; Henry F Lyle
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  The language of cooperation: reputation and honest signalling.

Authors:  S Számadó; D Balliet; F Giardini; E A Power; K Takács
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  The benefits of being seen to help others: indirect reciprocity and reputation-based partner choice.

Authors:  Gilbert Roberts; Nichola Raihani; Redouan Bshary; Héctor M Manrique; Andrea Farina; Flóra Samu; Pat Barclay
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  The emergence of cooperation by evolutionary generalization.

Authors:  Félix Geoffroy; Jean-Baptiste André
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.530

8.  Are Humans Too Generous and Too Punitive? Using Psychological Principles to Further Debates about Human Social Evolution.

Authors:  Max M Krasnow; Andrew W Delton
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-27

9.  Competition over personal resources favors contribution to shared resources in human groups.

Authors:  Jessica L Barker; Pat Barclay; H Kern Reeve
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Why humans might help strangers.

Authors:  Nichola J Raihani; Redouan Bshary
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.