Literature DB >> 21550112

Environmental properties and aquatic hazard assessment of anionic surfactants: physico-chemical, environmental fate and ecotoxicity properties.

Gustav Könnecker1, Jürgen Regelmann, Scott Belanger, Konrad Gamon, Richard Sedlak.   

Abstract

This paper summarizes the environmental hazard assessment of physicochemical properties, environmental fate and behavior and the ecotoxicity of a category of 61 anionic surfactants (ANS), comprised of alkyl sulfates (AS), primary alkane sulfonates (PAS) and alpha-olefin sulfonates (AOS) under the High Production Volume Chemicals Program of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The most important common structural feature of the category members examined here is the presence of a predominantly linear aliphatic hydrocarbon chain with a polar sulfate or sulfonate group, neutralized with a counter-ion. The hydrophobic hydrocarbon chain (with a length between C(8) and C(18)) and the polar sulfate or sulfonate groups confer surfactant properties and enable the commercial use of these substances as anionic surfactants. The close structural similarities lead to physico-chemical properties and environmental fate characteristics which follow a regular pattern and justify the applied read-across within a category approach. Common physical and/or biological properties result in structurally similar breakdown products and are, together with the surfactant properties, responsible for similar environmental behavior. The structural similarities result in the same mode of ecotoxic action. Within each of the three sub-categories of ANS the most important parameter influencing ecotoxicity is the varying length of the alkyl chain. Although the counter-ion may also influence the physico-chemical properties, there is no indication that it significantly affects chemical reactivity, environmental fate and behavior or ecotoxicity of these chemicals. Deduced from physico-chemical and surfactancy properties, the main target compartment for the substances of the ANS category is the hydrosphere. They are quantitatively removed in waste water treatment plants, mainly by biodegradation. Quantitative removal in biological treatment plants is reflected by low AS concentrations measured in effluents of waste water treatment plants (mostly below 10 μg/L). In addition, bioaccumulation of ANS does not exceed regulatory triggers based upon experimental data. A considerable number of reliable aquatic toxicity data for the whole ANS category are available, including chronic and subchronic data for species of all trophic levels. Based upon the highest quality data in hand, there appears to be no singularly most sensitive trophic level in tests on the toxicity of alkyl sulfates, with a large degree of overlap among algae, invertebrates and fish. Algae proved to be more variable in sensitivity to alkyl sulfate exposure compared to fish and daphnia. The key study for the aquatic hazard assessment is a chronic test on Ceriodaphnia dubia, which covers a range of the alkyl chain length from C(12) to C(18). A parabolic response was observed, with the C(14) chain length being the most toxic (7d-NOEC=0.045 mg/L). Responses of aquatic communities to C(12) AS and C(14-15) AS have been studied in high quality stream mesocosm studies containing a broad range of species and ecological interactions. These studies are regarded as a better approximation to reality when extrapolating to the environment. The 56-d chronic NOEC for C(12) AS and C(14-15) AS were 0.224 and 0.106 mg/L, respectively, based on integrated assessments of periphyton (algal, bacterial and protozoan) and invertebrate communities. Taking into account the rapid biodegradation of the ANS compounds as well as the low concentrations measured in different environmental compartments, this category of surfactants is of low concern for the environment.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21550112     DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf        ISSN: 0147-6513            Impact factor:   6.291


  12 in total

Review 1.  A perspective on the potential risks of emerging contaminants to human and environmental health.

Authors:  Lílian Cristina Pereira; Alecsandra Oliveira de Souza; Mariana Furio Franco Bernardes; Murilo Pazin; Maria Júlia Tasso; Paulo Henrique Pereira; Daniel Junqueira Dorta
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Performance of a wall cascade constructed wetland treating surfactant-polluted water.

Authors:  Jessica Tamiazzo; Simone Breschigliaro; Michela Salvato; Maurizio Borin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Environmental Safety of the Use of Major Surfactant Classes in North America.

Authors:  Christina Cowan-Ellsberry; Scott Belanger; Philip Dorn; Scott Dyer; Drew McAvoy; Hans Sanderson; Donald Versteeg; Darci Ferrer; Kathleen Stanton
Journal:  Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 12.561

4.  Environmental monitoring of alcohol sulfates and alcohol ethoxysulfates in marine sediments.

Authors:  Carolina Fernández-Ramos; Oscar Ballesteros; Alberto Zafra-Gómez; Francisco Javier Camino-Sánchez; Rosario Blanc; Alberto Navalón; José Luís Vílchez
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  A new nano-engineered hierarchical membrane for concurrent removal of surfactant and oil from oil-in-water nanoemulsion.

Authors:  Detao Qin; Zhaoyang Liu; Hongwei Bai; Darren Delai Sun; Xiaoxiao Song
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Alkyl Xylosides: Physico-Chemical Properties and Influence on Environmental Bacteria Cells.

Authors:  Wojciech Smułek; Ewa Kaczorek; Zuzana Hricovíniová
Journal:  J Surfactants Deterg       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 1.902

7.  Solubility Constraints on Aquatic Ecotoxicity Testing of Anionic Surfactants.

Authors:  J Hammer; A M Tukker; J F Postma; J J-H Haftka; J L M Hermens; P de Voogt; M H S Kraak
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 8.  How to accurately assess surfactant biodegradation-impact of sorption on the validity of results.

Authors:  Dorota Cierniak; Marta Woźniak-Karczewska; Anna Parus; Bogdan Wyrwas; Andreas P Loibner; Hermann J Heipieper; Łukasz Ławniczak; Łukasz Chrzanowski
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Assessment of ecological hazards and environmental fate of disinfectant quaternary ammonium compounds.

Authors:  Paul C DeLeo; Carolyn Huynh; Mala Pattanayek; Katherine Clark Schmid; Nathan Pechacek
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 6.291

Review 10.  Bioactive Aliphatic Sulfates from Marine Invertebrates.

Authors:  Luis C Kellner Filho; Bruno W Picão; Marcio L A Silva; Wilson R Cunha; Patricia M Pauletti; Gustavo M Dias; Brent R Copp; Camila S Bertanha; Ana H Januario
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 5.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.