Literature DB >> 21549706

Changing the ubiquitin landscape during viral manipulation of the DNA damage response.

Matthew D Weitzman1, Caroline E Lilley, Mira S Chaurushiya.   

Abstract

Viruses often induce signaling through the same cellular cascades that are activated by damage to the cellular genome. Signaling triggered by viral proteins or exogenous DNA delivered by viruses can be beneficial or detrimental to viral infection. Viruses have therefore evolved to dissect the cellular DNA damage response pathway during infection, often marking key cellular regulators with ubiquitin to induce their degradation or change their function. Signaling controlled by ubiquitin or ubiquitin-like proteins has recently emerged as key regulator of the cellular DNA damage response. Situated at the interface between DNA damage signaling and the ubiquitin system, viruses can reveal key convergence points in this important cellular pathway. In this review, we examine how viruses harness the diversity of the cellular ubiquitin system to modulate the DNA damage signaling pathway. We discuss the implications of viral infiltration of this pathway for both the transcriptional program of the virus and for the cellular response to DNA damage.
Copyright © 2011 Federation of European Biochemical Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21549706      PMCID: PMC3312807          DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.04.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEBS Lett        ISSN: 0014-5793            Impact factor:   4.124


  131 in total

1.  A RING finger ubiquitin ligase is protected from autocatalyzed ubiquitination and degradation by binding to ubiquitin-specific protease USP7.

Authors:  Mary Canning; Chris Boutell; Jane Parkinson; Roger D Everett
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Adenovirus ubiquitin-protein ligase stimulates viral late mRNA nuclear export.

Authors:  Jennifer L Woo; Arnold J Berk
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 3.  The DNA damage response pathways: at the crossroad of protein modifications.

Authors:  Michael S Y Huen; Junjie Chen
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 25.617

Review 4.  Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpr links proteasomal degradation and checkpoint activation.

Authors:  Jason L Dehart; Vicente Planelles
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Distinct requirements of adenovirus E1b55K protein for degradation of cellular substrates.

Authors:  Rachel A Schwartz; Seema S Lakdawala; Heather D Eshleman; Matthew R Russell; Christian T Carson; Matthew D Weitzman
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Reciprocal activities between herpes simplex virus type 1 regulatory protein ICP0, a ubiquitin E3 ligase, and ubiquitin-specific protease USP7.

Authors:  Chris Boutell; Mary Canning; Anne Orr; Roger D Everett
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  RNF8-dependent histone modifications regulate nucleosome removal during spermatogenesis.

Authors:  Lin-Yu Lu; Jiaxue Wu; Lin Ye; Galina B Gavrilina; Thomas L Saunders; Xiaochun Yu
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 8.  Tip60: connecting chromatin to DNA damage signaling.

Authors:  Yingli Sun; Xiaofeng Jiang; Brendan D Price
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  Adenovirus oncoproteins inactivate the Mre11-Rad50-NBS1 DNA repair complex.

Authors:  Travis H Stracker; Christian T Carson; Matthew D Weitzman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) encodes a SUMO E3 ligase that is SIM-dependent and SUMO-2/3-specific.

Authors:  Pei-Ching Chang; Yoshihiro Izumiya; Chun-Yi Wu; Latricia D Fitzgerald; Mel Campbell; Thomas J Ellison; Kit S Lam; Paul A Luciw; Hsing-Jien Kung
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  13 in total

1.  Proteomic profiling of the human cytomegalovirus UL35 gene products reveals a role for UL35 in the DNA repair response.

Authors:  Jayme Salsman; Madhav Jagannathan; Patrick Paladino; Pak-Kei Chan; Graham Dellaire; Brian Raught; Lori Frappier
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Baculovirus F-box protein LEF-7 modifies the host DNA damage response to enhance virus multiplication.

Authors:  Jonathan K Mitchell; Nathaniel M Byers; Paul D Friesen
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 3.  Push back to respond better: regulatory inhibition of the DNA double-strand break response.

Authors:  Stephanie Panier; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 4.  How virus persistence can initiate the tumorigenesis process.

Authors:  Simone Avanzi; Gualtiero Alvisi; Alessandro Ripalti
Journal:  World J Virol       Date:  2013-05-12

Review 5.  Ubiquitination at the interface of tumor viruses and DNA damage responses.

Authors:  Joseph M Dybas; Christin Herrmann; Matthew D Weitzman
Journal:  Curr Opin Virol       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 7.090

6.  SUMO binding by the Epstein-Barr virus protein kinase BGLF4 is crucial for BGLF4 function.

Authors:  Renfeng Li; Leyao Wang; Gangling Liao; Catherine M Guzzo; Michael J Matunis; Heng Zhu; S Diane Hayward
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 7.  Emerging roles for ubiquitin in adenovirus cell entry.

Authors:  Shauna A Marvin; Christopher M Wiethoff
Journal:  Biol Cell       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 8.  New answers to the old RIDDLE: RNF168 and the DNA damage response pathway.

Authors:  Jessica Kelliher; Gargi Ghosal; Justin Wai Chung Leung
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 5.622

Review 9.  Modulation of DNA damage and repair pathways by human tumour viruses.

Authors:  Robert Hollingworth; Roger J Grand
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 5.048

10.  ATM and ATR activities maintain replication fork integrity during SV40 chromatin replication.

Authors:  Gregory A Sowd; Nancy Yan Li; Ellen Fanning
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 6.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.