BACKGROUND: This study examines the cost and consequences of initiating an ARV regimen including Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) or Efavirenz (EFV), using data from a recent clinical trial in a previously published model of HIV-disease. METHODS: We populated the Markov model of HIV-disease with data from ACTG 5142 study to estimate the economic outcomes of starting ARV therapy with a PI-containing regimen as compared to an NNRTI-containing regimen, given their virologic and immunologic efficacy and effects on cholesterol and lipoatrophy. CNS toxicities and GI tolerability were not included in the model because of their transient nature or low cost remedies, and therefore lack of economic impact. CD4+ T-cell counts and the HIV-1 RNA (viral load) values from the study were used to assign a specific health state (HS) to each patient for each quarter year. The resulting frequencies used as "raw" data directly into the model obviate the reliance on statistical tests, and allow the model to reflect actual patient behavior in the clinical trial. An HS just below the last observed HS was used to replace a missing value. RESULTS: The modeled estimates (undiscounted) for the LPV/r-based regimen resulted in 1.41 quality-adjusted life months (QALMs) gained over a lifetime compared to the EFV-based regimen. The LPV/r-based regimen incurred $7,458 (1.8%) greater cost over a lifetime due to differences in drug costs and survival. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio using the discounted cost and QALYs was $88,829/QALY. Most of the higher costs accrue before the 7th year of treatment and were offset by subsequent savings. The estimates are highly sensitive to the effect of lipoatrophy on Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL), but not to the effect of cholesterol levels. CONCLUSIONS: The cost effectiveness of ARV regimens may be strongly affected by enduring AEs, such as lipoatrophy. It is important to consider specific AE effects from all drugs in a regimen when ARVs are compared. TRIAL REGISTRATION: (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00050895http://[ClinicalTrials.gov]).
BACKGROUND: This study examines the cost and consequences of initiating an ARV regimen including Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) or Efavirenz (EFV), using data from a recent clinical trial in a previously published model of HIV-disease. METHODS: We populated the Markov model of HIV-disease with data from ACTG 5142 study to estimate the economic outcomes of starting ARV therapy with a PI-containing regimen as compared to an NNRTI-containing regimen, given their virologic and immunologic efficacy and effects on cholesterol and lipoatrophy. CNS toxicities and GI tolerability were not included in the model because of their transient nature or low cost remedies, and therefore lack of economic impact. CD4+ T-cell counts and the HIV-1 RNA (viral load) values from the study were used to assign a specific health state (HS) to each patient for each quarter year. The resulting frequencies used as "raw" data directly into the model obviate the reliance on statistical tests, and allow the model to reflect actual patient behavior in the clinical trial. An HS just below the last observed HS was used to replace a missing value. RESULTS: The modeled estimates (undiscounted) for the LPV/r-based regimen resulted in 1.41 quality-adjusted life months (QALMs) gained over a lifetime compared to the EFV-based regimen. The LPV/r-based regimen incurred $7,458 (1.8%) greater cost over a lifetime due to differences in drug costs and survival. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio using the discounted cost and QALYs was $88,829/QALY. Most of the higher costs accrue before the 7th year of treatment and were offset by subsequent savings. The estimates are highly sensitive to the effect of lipoatrophy on Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL), but not to the effect of cholesterol levels. CONCLUSIONS: The cost effectiveness of ARV regimens may be strongly affected by enduring AEs, such as lipoatrophy. It is important to consider specific AE effects from all drugs in a regimen when ARVs are compared. TRIAL REGISTRATION: (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00050895http://[ClinicalTrials.gov]).
Authors: F J Palella; K M Delaney; A C Moorman; M O Loveless; J Fuhrer; G A Satten; D J Aschman; S D Holmberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-03-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Scott M Hammer; Michael S Saag; Mauro Schechter; Julio S G Montaner; Robert T Schooley; Donna M Jacobsen; Melanie A Thompson; Charles C J Carpenter; Margaret A Fischl; Brian G Gazzard; Jose M Gatell; Martin S Hirsch; David A Katzenstein; Douglas D Richman; Stefano Vella; Patrick G Yeni; Paul A Volberding Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-08-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: S Staszewski; J Morales-Ramirez; K T Tashima; A Rachlis; D Skiest; J Stanford; R Stryker; P Johnson; D F Labriola; D Farina; D J Manion; N M Ruiz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-12-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kathleen Squires; Adriano Lazzarin; José M Gatell; William G Powderly; Vadim Pokrovskiy; Jean-François Delfraissy; Joseph Jemsek; Antonio Rivero; Willy Rozenbaum; Shannon Schrader; Michael Sension; Asda Vibhagool; Alexandra Thiry; Michael Giordano Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2004-08-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Sharon Walmsley; Barry Bernstein; Martin King; José Arribas; Gildon Beall; Peter Ruane; Margaret Johnson; David Johnson; Richard Lalonde; Anthony Japour; Scott Brun; Eugene Sun Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-06-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Yiannis Koullias; Paul E Sax; Naomi F Fields; Rochelle P Walensky; Emily P Hyle Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2017-10-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Kit N Simpson; Pamela P Pei; Jörgen Möller; Robert W Baran; Birgitta Dietz; William Woodward; Kristen Migliaccio-Walle; J Jaime Caro Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 4.558