Literature DB >> 21547605

"If only" counterfactual thoughts about exceptional actions.

James E Dixon1, Ruth M J Byrne.   

Abstract

People create counterfactual alternatives that change an exceptional action to be like a usual one (e.g., "if he had placed his usual small bet he would have lost less"), as shown in Experiment 1. Experiments 2 and 3 eliminated and reversed this well-known effect: An exceptional action is instead changed to an exceptional alternative when it leads to a better outcome. Experiments 4 and 5 show that the reversal occurs whether or not the exceptional alternative is a justified action. The results indicate that the tendency to change an exceptional action to be like a usual one is guided by the optimality of the counterfactual outcome more than the exceptionality or justifiability of the action. The implications for theories of the counterfactual imagination are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21547605     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0101-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  18 in total

1.  The temporality effect in counterfactual thinking about what might have been.

Authors:  R M Byrne; S Segura; R Culhane; A Tasso; P Berrocal
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-03

2.  Mood, self-esteem, and simulated alternatives: thought-provoking affective influences on counterfactual direction.

Authors:  L J Sanna; K J Turley-Ames; S Meier
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-04

3.  Counterfactual thinking about controllable events.

Authors:  R McCloy; R M Byrne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-09

4.  Why positive information is processed faster: the density hypothesis.

Authors:  Christian Unkelbach; Klaus Fiedler; Myriam Bayer; Martin Stegmüller; Daniel Danner
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-07

Review 5.  The functional theory of counterfactual thinking.

Authors:  Kai Epstude; Neal J Roese
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-05

6.  Mental models and counterfactual thoughts about what might have been.

Authors:  Ruth M.J. Byrne
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 7.  The experience of regret: what, when, and why.

Authors:  T Gilovich; V H Medvec
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Temporal and causal order effects in thinking about what might have been.

Authors:  Susana Segura; Pablo Fernandez-Berrocal; Ruth M J Byrne
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2002-10

9.  When debiasing backfires: accessible content and accessibility experiences in debiasing hindsight.

Authors:  Lawrence J Sanna; Norbert Schwarz; Shevaun L Stocker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Précis of The rational imagination: how people create alternatives to reality.

Authors:  Ruth M J Byrne
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 12.579

View more
  2 in total

1.  Use or Consequences: Probing the Cognitive Difference Between Two Measures of Divergent Thinking.

Authors:  Richard W Hass; Roger E Beaty
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-27

2.  Causal conditionals and counterfactuals.

Authors:  Caren A Frosch; Ruth M J Byrne
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2012-08-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.