BACKGROUND: Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease and little is known about its etiopathogenesis. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) provides a method to quantitatively measure the changes of DNA copy number and to map them directly onto the complete linear genome sequences. The aim of this study was to investigate DNA imbalances by aCGH and compare them with a female breast cancer dataset. METHODS: We used Agilent Human Genome CGH Microarray Kit 44B and 44 K to compare genomic alterations in 25 male breast cancer tissues studied at NCC of Bari and 16 female breast cancer deposited with the Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE 12659). Data analysis was performed with Nexus Copy Number 5.0 software. RESULTS: All the 25 male and 16 female breast cancer samples displayed some chromosomal instability (110,93 alterations per patient in female, 69 in male). However, male samples presented a lower frequency of genetic alterations both in terms of loss and gains. CONCLUSION: aCGH is an effective tool for analysis of cytogenetic aberrations in MBC, which involves different biological processes than female. Male most significant altered regions contained genes involved in cell communication, cell division and immunological response, while female cell-cell junction maintenance, regulation of transcription and neuron development.
BACKGROUND:Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease and little is known about its etiopathogenesis. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) provides a method to quantitatively measure the changes of DNA copy number and to map them directly onto the complete linear genome sequences. The aim of this study was to investigate DNA imbalances by aCGH and compare them with a female breast cancer dataset. METHODS: We used Agilent Human Genome CGH Microarray Kit 44B and 44 K to compare genomic alterations in 25 male breast cancer tissues studied at NCC of Bari and 16 female breast cancer deposited with the Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE 12659). Data analysis was performed with Nexus Copy Number 5.0 software. RESULTS: All the 25 male and 16 female breast cancer samples displayed some chromosomal instability (110,93 alterations per patient in female, 69 in male). However, male samples presented a lower frequency of genetic alterations both in terms of loss and gains. CONCLUSION: aCGH is an effective tool for analysis of cytogenetic aberrations in MBC, which involves different biological processes than female. Male most significant altered regions contained genes involved in cell communication, cell division and immunological response, while female cell-cell junction maintenance, regulation of transcription and neuron development.
Authors: S Solinas-Toldo; S Lampel; S Stilgenbauer; J Nickolenko; A Benner; H Döhner; T Cremer; P Lichter Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 1997-12 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: L S Friedman; S A Gayther; T Kurosaki; D Gordon; B Noble; G Casey; B A Ponder; H Anton-Culver Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 1997-02 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: D Ford; D F Easton; M Stratton; S Narod; D Goldgar; P Devilee; D T Bishop; B Weber; G Lenoir; J Chang-Claude; H Sobol; M D Teare; J Struewing; A Arason; S Scherneck; J Peto; T R Rebbeck; P Tonin; S Neuhausen; R Barkardottir; J Eyfjord; H Lynch; B A Ponder; S A Gayther; M Zelada-Hedman Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Fabrice Andre; Bastien Job; Philippe Dessen; Attila Tordai; Stefan Michiels; Cornelia Liedtke; Catherine Richon; Kai Yan; Bailang Wang; Gilles Vassal; Suzette Delaloge; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; W Fraser Symmans; Vladimir Lazar; Lajos Pusztai Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: D Pinkel; R Segraves; D Sudar; S Clark; I Poole; D Kowbel; C Collins; W L Kuo; C Chen; Y Zhai; S H Dairkee; B M Ljung; J W Gray; D G Albertson Journal: Nat Genet Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Kaiyumars B Contractor; Kanchan Kaur; Gabriel S Rodrigues; Dhananjay M Kulkarni; Hemant Singhal Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2008-06-16 Impact factor: 2.754
Authors: Cathy B Moelans; Joep de Ligt; Petra van der Groep; Pjotr Prins; Nicolle J M Besselink; Marlous Hoogstraat; Natalie D Ter Hoeve; Miangela M Lacle; Robert Kornegoor; Carmen C van der Pol; Wendy W J de Leng; Ellis Barbé; Bert van der Vegt; John Martens; Peter Bult; Vincent T H B M Smit; Marco J Koudijs; Isaac J Nijman; Emile E Voest; Pier Selenica; Britta Weigelt; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Elsken van der Wall; Edwin Cuppen; Paul J van Diest Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: S Deb; S Q Wong; J Li; H Do; J Weiss; D Byrne; A Chakrabarti; T Bosma; A Fellowes; A Dobrovic; S B Fox Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2014-12-09 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Hong Yuen Wong; Grace M Wang; Sarah Croessmann; Daniel J Zabransky; David Chu; Joseph P Garay; Justin Cidado; Rory L Cochran; Julia A Beaver; Anita Aggarwal; Min-Ling Liu; Pedram Argani; Alan Meeker; Paula J Hurley; Josh Lauring; Ben Ho Park Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2015-12-29