Literature DB >> 21546186

Prospective image registration for automated scan prescription of follow-up knee images in quantitative studies.

Janet Goldenstein1, Joseph Schooler, Jason C Crane, Eugene Ozhinsky, Jean-Baptiste Pialat, Julio Carballido-Gamio, Sharmila Majumdar.   

Abstract

Consistent scan prescription for MRI of the knee is very important for accurate comparison of images in a longitudinal study. However, consistent scan region selection is difficult due to the complexity of the knee joint. We propose a novel method for registering knee images using a mutual information registration algorithm to align images in a baseline and follow-up exam. The output of the registration algorithm, three translations and three Euler angles, is then used to redefine the region to be imaged and acquire an identical oblique imaging volume in the follow-up exam as in the baseline. This algorithm is robust to articulation of the knee and anatomical abnormalities due to disease (e.g., osteophytes). The registration method is performed only on the distal femur and is not affected by the proximal tibia or soft tissues. We have incorporated this approach in a clinical MR system and have demonstrated its utility in automatically obtaining consistent scan regions between baseline and follow-up examinations, thus improving the precision of quantitative evaluation of cartilage. Results show an improvement with prospective registration in the coefficient of variation for cartilage thickness, cartilage volume and T2 relaxation measurements.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21546186      PMCID: PMC3100398          DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2011.02.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  28 in total

1.  Automatic scan prescription for brain MRI.

Authors:  L Itti; L Chang; T Ernst
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Comparison of manual and automatic section positioning of brain MR images.

Authors:  Thomas Benner; Jonathan J Wisco; André J W van der Kouwe; Bruce Fischl; Mark G Vangel; Fred H Hochberg; A Gregory Sorensen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Automated planning of scan geometries in spine MRI scans.

Authors:  Vladimir Pekar; Daniel Bystrov; Harald S Heese; Sebastian P M Dries; Stefan Schmidt; Rüdiger Grewer; Chiel J den Harder; René C Bergmans; Arjan W Simonetti; Arianne M van Muiswinkel
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2007

4.  Automatic prospective registration of high-resolution trabecular bone images of the tibia.

Authors:  Janet Blumenfeld; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Roland Krug; Daniel J Blezek; Ileana Hancu; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information.

Authors:  F Maes; A Collignon; D Vandermeulen; G Marchal; P Suetens
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  In vivo T(1rho) and T(2) mapping of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis of the knee using 3 T MRI.

Authors:  X Li; C Benjamin Ma; T M Link; D-D Castillo; G Blumenkrantz; J Lozano; J Carballido-Gamio; M Ries; S Majumdar
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  C G Peterfy; A Guermazi; S Zaim; P F J Tirman; Y Miaux; D White; M Kothari; Y Lu; K Fye; S Zhao; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  Determination of knee joint cartilage thickness using three-dimensional magnetic resonance chondro-crassometry (3D MR-CCM).

Authors:  F Eckstein; A Gavazzeni; H Sittek; M Haubner; A Lösch; S Milz; K H Englmeier; E Schulte; R Putz; M Reiser
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Inter-subject comparison of MRI knee cartilage thickness.

Authors:  Julio Carballido-Gamio; Jan S Bauer; Robert Stahl; Keh-Yang Lee; Stefanie Krause; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 8.545

10.  Subregional femorotibial cartilage morphology in women--comparison between healthy controls and participants with different grades of radiographic knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  M-P Hellio Le Graverand; R J Buck; B T Wyman; E Vignon; S A Mazzuca; K D Brandt; M Piperno; H C Charles; M Hudelmaier; D J Hunter; C Jackson; V B Kraus; T M Link; S Majumdar; P V Prasad; T J Schnitzer; A Vaz; W Wirth; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 6.576

View more
  1 in total

1.  Response of knee cartilage T1rho and T2 relaxation times to in vivo mechanical loading in individuals with and without knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  R B Souza; D Kumar; N Calixto; J Singh; J Schooler; K Subburaj; X Li; T M Link; S Majumdar
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 6.576

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.