AIMS: To investigate the population pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone in critically ill patients suffering from sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock. METHODS: Blood samples were collected at preselected times in 54 adult patients suffering from sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock in order to determine ceftriaxone concentrations using high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection. The pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone were assessed on two separate occasions for each patient: on the second day of ceftriaxone therapy and 48 h after catecholamine withdrawal in patients with septic shock, or on the fifth day in patients with sepsis. The population pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone were studied using nonlinear mixed effects modelling. RESULTS: The population estimates (interindividual variability; coefficient of variation) for ceftriaxone pharmacokinetics were: a clearance of 0.88 l h(-1) (49%), a mean half-life of 9.6 h (range 0.83-28.6 h) and a total volume of distribution of 19.5 l (range 6.48-35.2 l). The total volume of distribution was higher than that generally found in healthy individuals and increased with the severity of sepsis. However, the only covariate influencing the ceftriaxone pharmacokinetics was creatinine clearance. Dosage simulations showed that the risk of ceftriaxone concentrations dropping below the minimum inhibitory concentration threshold was low. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the wide interpatient variability of ceftriaxone pharmacokinetic parameters, our results revealed that increasing the ceftriaxone dosage when treating critically ill patients is unnecessary. The risk of ceftriaxone concentrations dropping below the minimum inhibitory concentration threshold is limited to patients with high glomerular filtration rates or infections with high minimum inhibitory concentration pathogens (>1 mg l(-1)).
AIMS: To investigate the population pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone in critically illpatients suffering from sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock. METHODS: Blood samples were collected at preselected times in 54 adult patients suffering from sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock in order to determine ceftriaxone concentrations using high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection. The pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone were assessed on two separate occasions for each patient: on the second day of ceftriaxone therapy and 48 h after catecholamine withdrawal in patients with septic shock, or on the fifth day in patients with sepsis. The population pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone were studied using nonlinear mixed effects modelling. RESULTS: The population estimates (interindividual variability; coefficient of variation) for ceftriaxone pharmacokinetics were: a clearance of 0.88 l h(-1) (49%), a mean half-life of 9.6 h (range 0.83-28.6 h) and a total volume of distribution of 19.5 l (range 6.48-35.2 l). The total volume of distribution was higher than that generally found in healthy individuals and increased with the severity of sepsis. However, the only covariate influencing the ceftriaxone pharmacokinetics was creatinine clearance. Dosage simulations showed that the risk of ceftriaxone concentrations dropping below the minimum inhibitory concentration threshold was low. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the wide interpatient variability of ceftriaxone pharmacokinetic parameters, our results revealed that increasing the ceftriaxone dosage when treating critically illpatients is unnecessary. The risk of ceftriaxone concentrations dropping below the minimum inhibitory concentration threshold is limited to patients with high glomerular filtration rates or infections with high minimum inhibitory concentration pathogens (>1 mg l(-1)).
Authors: J L Vincent; R Moreno; J Takala; S Willatts; A De Mendonça; H Bruining; C K Reinhart; P M Suter; L G Thijs Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: J Meletiadis; A Turlej-Rogacka; A Lerner; A Adler; E Tacconelli; J W Mouton Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-10-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Michael Schleibinger; Cathérine L Steinbach; Christoph Töpper; Alexander Kratzer; Uwe Liebchen; Frieder Kees; Bernd Salzberger; Martin G Kees Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2015-06-11 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Yanli Zhao; Merit E Cudkowicz; Jeremy M Shefner; Lisa Krivickas; William S David; Francine Vriesendorp; Alan Pestronk; James B Caress; Jonathan Katz; Ericka Simpson; Jeffrey Rosenfeld; Robert Pascuzzi; Jonathan Glass; Kourosh Rezania; Jerold S Harmatz; David Schoenfeld; David J Greenblatt Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2014-05-16 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Andrew Ackerman; Nathaniel R Zook; Jeremy F Siegrist; Charles F Brummitt; Margaret M Cook; Thomas J Dilworth Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2020-05-21 Impact factor: 5.191