Literature DB >> 21545110

How does a drug molecule find its target binding site?

Yibing Shan1, Eric T Kim, Michael P Eastwood, Ron O Dror, Markus A Seeliger, David E Shaw.   

Abstract

Although the thermodynamic principles that control the binding of drug molecules to their protein targets are well understood, detailed experimental characterization of the process by which such binding occurs has proven challenging. We conducted relatively long, unguided molecular dynamics simulations in which a ligand (the cancer drug dasatinib or the kinase inhibitor PP1) was initially placed at a random location within a box that also contained a protein (Src kinase) to which that ligand was known to bind. In several of these simulations, the ligand correctly identified its target binding site, forming a complex virtually identical to the crystallographically determined bound structure. The simulated trajectories provide a continuous, atomic-level view of the entire binding process, revealing persistent and noteworthy intermediate conformations and shedding light on the role of water molecules. The technique we employed, which does not assume any prior knowledge of the binding site's location, may prove particularly useful in the development of allosteric inhibitors that target previously undiscovered binding sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21545110      PMCID: PMC3221467          DOI: 10.1021/ja202726y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  10 in total

1.  Energy landscape theory, funnels, specificity, and optimal criterion of biomolecular binding.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Gennady M Verkhivker
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2003-05-06       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Motifs for molecular recognition exploiting hydrophobic enclosure in protein-ligand binding.

Authors:  Tom Young; Robert Abel; Byungchan Kim; Bruce J Berne; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Protein kinases: evolution of dynamic regulatory proteins.

Authors:  Susan S Taylor; Alexandr P Kornev
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 13.807

4.  Blind docking of drug-sized compounds to proteins with up to a thousand residues.

Authors:  Csaba Hetényi; David van der Spoel
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 4.124

5.  Hybrid compound design to overcome the gatekeeper T338M mutation in cSrc.

Authors:  Matthäus Getlik; Christian Grütter; Jeffrey R Simard; Sabine Klüter; Matthias Rabiller; Haridas B Rode; Armin Robubi; Daniel Rauh
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  A conserved protonation-dependent switch controls drug binding in the Abl kinase.

Authors:  Yibing Shan; Markus A Seeliger; Michael P Eastwood; Filipp Frank; Huafeng Xu; Morten Ø Jensen; Ron O Dror; John Kuriyan; David E Shaw
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Blind docking of pharmaceutically relevant compounds using RosettaLigand.

Authors:  Ian W Davis; Kaushik Raha; Martha S Head; David Baker
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Crystal structure of the Src family tyrosine kinase Hck.

Authors:  F Sicheri; I Moarefi; J Kuriyan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-02-13       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: a synthesis.

Authors:  J D Bryngelson; J N Onuchic; N D Socci; P G Wolynes
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1995-03

Review 10.  Just add water! The effect of water on the specificity of protein-ligand binding sites and its potential application to drug design.

Authors:  J E Ladbury
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  1996-12
  10 in total
  169 in total

1.  Let's get honest about sampling.

Authors:  David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Locating binding poses in protein-ligand systems using reconnaissance metadynamics.

Authors:  Pär Söderhjelm; Gareth A Tribello; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Flexibility and binding affinity in protein-ligand, protein-protein and multi-component protein interactions: limitations of current computational approaches.

Authors:  Pierre Tuffery; Philippe Derreumaux
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Role of water and steric constraints in the kinetics of cavity-ligand unbinding.

Authors:  Pratyush Tiwary; Jagannath Mondal; Joseph A Morrone; B J Berne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Incorporating specificity into optimization: evaluation of SPA using CSAR 2014 and CASF 2013 benchmarks.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Yan; Jin Wang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Peptide Binding to a PDZ Domain by Electrostatic Steering via Nonnative Salt Bridges.

Authors:  Nicolas Blöchliger; Min Xu; Amedeo Caflisch
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Dynamic architecture of a protein kinase.

Authors:  Christopher L McClendon; Alexandr P Kornev; Michael K Gilson; Susan S Taylor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Computational methods in drug discovery.

Authors:  Gregory Sliwoski; Sandeepkumar Kothiwale; Jens Meiler; Edward W Lowe
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 25.468

9.  On the interaction mechanisms of a p53 peptide and nutlin with the MDM2 and MDMX proteins: a Brownian dynamics study.

Authors:  Karim M ElSawy; Chandra S Verma; Thomas L Joseph; David P Lane; Reidun Twarock; Leo S D Caves
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  Functional-segregated coumarin-containing telodendrimer nanocarriers for efficient delivery of SN-38 for colon cancer treatment.

Authors:  Gaofei Xu; Changying Shi; Dandan Guo; Lili Wang; Yun Ling; Xiaobing Han; Juntao Luo
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 8.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.