Literature DB >> 21543703

Cementless metal-on-metal versus ceramic-on-polyethylene hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years of age: a comparative study with twelve to fourteen-year follow-up.

Henri Migaud1, Sophie Putman, Nicolas Krantz, Laurent Vasseur, Julien Girard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We previously reported the outcomes of a case-control study, at a minimum of five years of follow-up, comparing metal-on-metal and ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings for cementless primary hip arthroplasty in active patients below the age of fifty years. This report is an update on these groups after a minimum duration of follow-up of twelve years.
METHODS: Thirty-nine metal-on-metal cementless hip replacements with a 28-mm-diameter Metasul articulation were compared with a control group that included thirty-nine cementless ceramic-on-polyethylene hip replacements performed with a 28-mm-diameter head. The Metasul group included thirty patients with a mean age of forty years (range, twenty-three to forty-nine years), and the control group included thirty-two patients with a mean age of forty-one years (range, fifteen to forty-nine years). The groups were matched for age, activity level, preoperative Harris hip score, acetabular cup diameter, and indication for hip arthroplasty. All patients had a high level of activity, with 82% rated as grade IV or V according to the Devane scale.
RESULTS: After a mean duration of follow-up of thirteen years (twelve to fourteen years), only one hip (3%) had asymptomatic acetabular osteolysis and no hip (0%) had been revised in the metal-on-metal group, whereas eighteen hips (46%) had osteolysis and eleven hips (28%) had been revised because of wear or osteolysis in the ceramic-on-polyethylene group (p < 0.003). In the metal-on-metal group, the median Co concentration in the whole blood was 0.95 μg/L (0.4 to 4.8 μg/L) and the median Cr concentration was 1.2 μg/L (0.1 to 5.6 μg/L). The twelve-year survival rate (with reoperation for any reason as the end point) was 100% in the metal-on-metal group and 70% (95% confidence interval, 63% to 77%) in the ceramic-on-polyethylene group (p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: After twelve to fourteen years of follow-up, metal-on-metal implants demonstrated better radiographic and survival results than ceramic-on-polyethylene implants in young, very active patients. Current wrought metal-on-metal implants with a 28-mm-diameter head and high carbide concentration did not produce the high rates of osteolysis and allergic reactions that may be observed with cast low-carbide metal-on-metal bearings after a shorter duration of follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21543703     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  18 in total

1.  Does impact sport activity influence total hip arthroplasty durability?

Authors:  Matthieu Ollivier; Solenne Frey; Sebastien Parratte; Xavier Flecher; Jean-Noël Argenson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty With Metasul Bearings Provides Good Results in Active Young Patients: A Concise Followup.

Authors:  Christian P Delaunay; Sophie Putman; Benjamin Puliéro; Matthieu Bégin; Henri Migaud; François Bonnomet
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  What are the advantages and disadvantages of imaging modalities to diagnose wear-related corrosion problems?

Authors:  Denis Nam; Robert L Barrack; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Minimum ten-year results of a 28-mm metal-on-metal bearing in cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients fifty years of age and younger.

Authors:  Moritz M Innmann; Tobias Gotterbarm; Jan Philippe Kretzer; Christian Merle; Volker Ewerbeck; Stefan Weiss; Peter R Aldinger; Marcus R Streit
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Outcomes after revision of metal on metal hip resurfacing to total arthroplasty using the direct anterior approach.

Authors:  Victoire Bouveau; Thomas-Xavier Haen; Joel Poupon; Christophe Nich
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  What Is the Long-term Survival for Primary THA With Small-head Metal-on-metal Bearings?

Authors:  Richard de Steiger; Andrea Peng; Peter Lewis; Stephen Graves
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Adverse Reactions to Metal on Metal Are Not Exclusive to Large Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Joanne B Adams; Keri L Satterwhite
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Is it Time for Cementless Hip Resurfacing?

Authors:  Julien Girard
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-13

Review 9.  Metal-on-Metal Bearing: Is This the End of the Line? We Do Not Think So.

Authors:  Henri Migaud; Sophie Putman; Antoine Combes; Charles Berton; Donatien Bocquet; Laurent Vasseur; Julien Girard
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-11

10.  Long-term results of metal on metal total hip arthroplasty in younger patients (<55yrs).

Authors:  Muhammad Umar; Noman Jahangir; Qasim Malik; Steven Kershaw; Keith Barnes; Syam Morapudi
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-05-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.