Literature DB >> 21542606

Linking of sensor molecules with amino groups to amino-functionalized AFM tips.

Linda Wildling1, Barbara Unterauer, Rong Zhu, Anne Rupprecht, Thomas Haselgrübler, Christian Rankl, Andreas Ebner, Doris Vater, Philipp Pollheimer, Elena E Pohl, Peter Hinterdorfer, Hermann J Gruber.   

Abstract

The measuring tip of an atomic force microscope (AFM) can be upgraded to a specific biosensor by attaching one or a few biomolecules to the apex of the tip. The biofunctionalized tip is then used to map cognate target molecules on a sample surface or to study biophysical parameters of interaction with the target molecules. The functionality of tip-bound sensor molecules is greatly enhanced if they are linked via a thin, flexible polymer chain. In a typical scheme of tip functionalization, reactive groups are first generated on the tip surface, a bifunctional cross-linker is then attached with one of its two reactive ends, and finally the probe molecule of interest is coupled to the free end of the cross-linker. Unfortunately, the most popular functional group generated on the tip surface is the amino group, while at the same time, the only useful coupling functions of many biomolecules (such as antibodies) are also NH(2) groups. In the past, various tricks or detours were applied to minimize the undesired bivalent reaction of bifunctional linkers with adjacent NH(2) groups on the tip surface. In the present study, an uncompromising solution to this problem was found with the help of a new cross-linker ("acetal-PEG-NHS") which possesses one activated carboxyl group and one acetal-protected benzaldehyde function. The activated carboxyl ensures rapid unilateral attachment to the amino-functionalized tip, and only then is the terminal acetal group converted into the amino-reactive benzaldehyde function by mild treatment (1% citric acid, 1-10 min) which does not harm the AFM tip. As an exception, AFM tips with magnetic coating become demagnetized in 1% citric acid. This problem was solved by deprotecting the acetal group before coupling the PEG linker to the AFM tip. Bivalent binding of the corresponding linker ("aldehyde-PEG-NHS") to adjacent NH(2) groups on the tip was largely suppressed by high linker concentrations. In this way, magnetic AFM tips could be functionalized with an ethylene diamine derivative of ATP which showed specific interaction with mitochondrial uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) that had been purified and reconstituted in a mica-supported planar lipid bilayer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21542606      PMCID: PMC3115690          DOI: 10.1021/bc200099t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioconjug Chem        ISSN: 1043-1802            Impact factor:   4.774


Introduction

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) can operate in aqueous solution under physiological conditions(1) and reveal fine details not resolved by electron microscopy.(2) AFM is thus well-suited for the structural analysis of biomolecules and their assemblies.[1,3] In addition, an AFM tip can be functionalized with one or several probe molecules (e.g., antibodies) whereupon it can be used as a specific biosensor by which cognate target molecules (e.g., antigens) are detected when the tip is moved over the sample surface.[4−6] Binding is detected as a rupture event which is sensed by a vertically oscillated cantilever(7) preferably under simultaneous monitoring of sample topography.[8,9] Alternatively, the tip can be vertically oscillated at a fixed X–Y position above a target molecule, in which case repeated binding–unbinding events are recorded as force–distance profiles. When repeating force–distance cycles at different force loading rates,(10) detailed biophysical parameters of the noncovalent bond can be calculated from the force data.[4,5,11−14] Linear polymers, such as carboxymethylamylose,[15−18] poly(N-succinimidyl acrylate),(19) or poly(ethylene glycol) chains (PEG),[6,12,14,20−31] have regularly been used as flexible tethers between the tip and the probe molecule, resulting in much higher probability for binding between the probe molecule on the tip and the target molecules on the sample surface. Tethering of probe molecules via linear polymers is usually performed in three stages. First, reactive sites are generated on the tip surface. Second, a linear polymer (“cross-linker”) is attached with one reactive end while reserving the other end for the probe molecule. Third, the probe molecule is coupled to the free end of the polymer chain. The most straightforward scheme comprises (i) amino-functionalization of the tip, (ii) amide bond formation with a heterobifunctional cross-linker that has one amino- and one thiol-reactive end group, and (iii) attachment of a thiol-carrying probe molecule to the free end of the cross-linker.[6,8,9,25,28,32] Unfortunately, antibodies and many other proteins possess no free thiols (cysteines) but lots of reactive amino functions (lysines, e.g., 80–90 per antibody).(33) At the same time, amino-functionalization is the predominant method of tip surface activation. This poses the problem of connecting tip-NH2 with NH2-protein with a bifunctional cross-linker, while preventing cross-linker loops between adjacent NH2 groups on the tip surface. The nontrivial task has been solved by several strategies, each having its own advantages and drawbacks. The simplest approach is to use a heterobifunctional cross-linker, as described above, and to pre-derivatize the protein with a reagent that introduces free thiol residues[20,24,25] or pentynoyl groups (for coupling to an azide on the linker via click chemistry).[22,34] These methods work well, yet ∼0.2 mg of precious antibody is required per batch, and gel filtration is needed for rigorous removal of reagents. Consequently, the derivatized antibody is rather dilute which prevents refreezing of unused portions. For minimization of antibody consumption, several methods have been developed in which the lysine residues of antibodies (or other proteins) are directly coupled to tip-bound cross-linker, without pretreatment of the protein. (i) Gold-coated tips were covered with a SAM containing exposed thiol groups to which a heterobifunctional linker (maleimide-PEG-NHS) was bound with its maleimide function.[12,14] In this way, the amino-reactive NHS ester group was spared for subsequent coupling of protein via lysine. (ii) Gold-coated tips were amino-functionalized with cystamine, and carboxymethylamylose was bound via some of its many NHS ester functions, leaving the other NHS ester groups for coupling of protein.[17,18] In both methods, the large radius of the gold-coated tips reduces their usefulness for high-resolution imaging. (iii) Silicon nitride tips were amino-silanized and NHS-activated carboxymethylamylose was applied in the analogous way.[15,16] (iv) Silicon nitride tips were silanized with a mixture of aminosilane and a large excess of an inert silane, aiming at such a low surface density of NH2 functions that homobifunctional NHS-PEG-NHS could react with one NHS ester function only, whereupon protein could react with the second NHS ester group.(30) All NHS ester methods (i–iv) have in common that coupling of protein is fast and efficient, provided that the concentration of protein is high enough and the optimal pH value is chosen to outrun premature hydrolysis of the NHS ester functions.[35,36] In this respect, aldehyde functions are a promising alterative because they cannot hydrolyze. Under comparable conditions, coupling of amino groups to aldehydes is much slower than to NHS esters.[36,37] In a recent study, we took advantage of this kinetic difference by devising a new heterobifunctional cross-linker (aldehyde-PEG-NHS)(38) for AFM tip functionalization (Figure 1a,b). When applying the same concentration as with other cross-linkers (1 mg/mL), the tendency for loop formation between adjacent NH2 groups was very pronounced (Figure 1a). At high concentration (6.6 mg/mL), however, the majority of NH2 functions on the tip was rapidly consumed by reaction with NHS esters (Figure 1b); thus, most benzaldehyde functions were spared for coupling of protein.(38) This method was successfully used in a number of AFM studies.[21,23,38−49]
Figure 1

AFM tip functionalization with aldehyde-PEG-NHS as compared to acetal-PEG-NHS. Loop formation between adjacent amino groups can occur with aldehyde-PEG-NHS (a); it is largely suppressed at high concentrations of aldehyde-PEG-NHS (b). No loop formation occurs with acetal-PEG-NHS (c), since the acetal is converted into aldehyde only after derivatization of all NH2 groups on the AFM tip (d). Lysine residues of proteins can be coupled to terminal benzaldehyde functions (e).

AFM tip functionalization with aldehyde-PEG-NHS as compared to acetal-PEG-NHS. Loop formation between adjacent amino groups can occur with aldehyde-PEG-NHS (a); it is largely suppressed at high concentrations of aldehyde-PEG-NHS (b). No loop formation occurs with acetal-PEG-NHS (c), since the acetal is converted into aldehyde only after derivatization of all NH2 groups on the AFM tip (d). Lysine residues of proteins can be coupled to terminal benzaldehyde functions (e). In the present study, the benzaldehyde function was kept in a protected form until all NH2 groups on the tip surface had formed amide bonds with a new linker (acetal-PEG-NHS, Figure 1c). Subsequently, the acetal functions were converted into reactive aldehyde moieties. Dilute citric acid was found to cleave all acetal functions without harmful effects on the tip surface and on the gold mirror on the top side of the cantilever. This strategy affords effective tip functionalization at low cross-linker concentration, which adds to the advantage that synthesis of acetal-PEG-NHS is much simpler than of aldehyde-PEG-NHS.

Experimental Procedures

Materials

Analytical-grade solvents and reagents were used as long as they were commercially available. Muscovite mica sheets were supplied by Christiane Gröpl (Austria). Si3N4 measuring tips were purchased from Veeco (Santa Barbara, CA) and Si3N4 chips from Wacker-Chemitronic GmbH (Germany). APTES was obtained from Aldrich. NaCNBH3 was purchased from Fluka. Avidin, d-biotin, EAP, and ethanolamine hydrochloride were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. EDA-ATP was obtained from BioLog (Bremen, Germany). NH2-PEG-COOH was synthesized as described.(50) Acetal-PEG-NHS and aldehyde-PEG-NHS were synthesized as outlined in Figure 3 (see Supporting Information for details). Biotin-IgG was prepared by derivatization of goat IgG with biotin-cap-NHS as described.(25) Buffer A contained 100 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaH2PO4, and 1 mM EDTA (pH 7.5 adjusted with NaOH). Buffer B contained 300 mM NaH2PO4 and 1 mM EDTA (pH 7.5 adjusted with NaOH). PBS contained 150 mM NaCl and 5 mM NaH2PO4 (pH 7.4 adjusted with NaOH). Mitochondrial uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) was purified and reconstituted into mica-supported bilayers as described in the Supporting Information.
Figure 3

Force spectroscopy of single avidin–biotin interactions. (A) The AFM tip was functionalized with biotin-IgG, as outlined in Figure 1cd (or in greater detail in Figure S5, Supporting Information), using ethanolamine hydrochloride for tip amino-functionalization and iodine/acetone for cleavage of the acetal functions. In parallel, avidin was irreversibly adsorbed onto freshly cleaved mica. (B) Example of a force–distance cycle showing specific avidin–biotin unbinding. The piezo movement in the approach-and-retraction cycles was ±100 nm in 1 s, the force constant of the cantilever was 18 pN/nm, and the loading rate at unbinding was calculated as 1180 pN/s. Unbinding occurred at a rupture force of 51 pN and a tip–mica distance of 22 nm. (C) Example of a force–distance cycle performed in the presence of free streptavidin (0.5 mg/mL final concentration in PBS). (D) Probability density function (pdf) of the unbinding forces observed in 199 out of 948 force–distance cycles (solid line, 21% binding probability). In the presence of free streptavidin, only 3 out of 198 force–distance cycles showed apparent unbinding events (dashed gray trace, 1.5% binding probability).

Functionalization of AFM Tips with Acetal-PEG-NHS and Antibodies

AFM Tips (Si3N4) were amino-functionalized either with a solution of ethanolamine hydrochloride in DMSO (“room temperature method”)(51) or with APTES from gas phase,[51,52] as specified. Attachment of acetal-PEG-NHS was performed by 2 h incubation of the tips in 0.5 mL of chloroform containing 1 mg/mL acetal-PEG-NHS and 0.5% (v/v) of TEA. Subsequently, the tips were rinsed in chloroform (3×). Two alternate methods were used for conversion of the acetal functions into aldehyde groups: (i) immersion in acetone containing 0.1% iodine for 5 min and rinsing in pure acetone (3 × 5 min), (ii) immersion in water containing 1% citric acid for 10 min and rinsing with water (3 × 5 min). For the coupling of the antibody, tips were transferred into a mixture of 50 μL biotin-IgG solution (0.2 mg/mL in buffer A) with 2 μL 1 M NaCNBH3 stock solution (to reach a final concentration of 40 mM NaCNBH3) for one hour. Subsequently, 5 μL of ethanolamine hydrochloride stock solution (1 M, preadjusted to pH 9.6 with 20% NaOH) was mixed into the biotin-IgG solution and incubation was continued for 10 more minutes. Finally, the tips were washed in PBS (3 × 5 min) and stored in PBS at 4 °C until use (up to 3 days). A detailed illustration of tip functionalization is found in the Supporting Information (Figure S5).

Monitoring of Single Unbinding Events between Tip-Bound Biotin-IgG and Mica-Bound Avidin by AFM

Avidin (1 mg/mL in PBS) was diluted with 1 mM NaCl to a final concentration of 0.5 μg/mL and absorbed to freshly cleaved mica. After 15 min, the substrate was rinsed with 1 mM NaCl (10×) and subsequently with PBS (10×). Force measurements with biotin-IgG-functionalized AFM tips were performed in a fluid cell of a commercial AFM (PicoSPM, Agilent, Tempe, AZ). Force–distance cycles were recorded at a 1 Hz vertical scan rate and 100–300 nm z-amplitude. The measurements were performed at a constant trace and retrace velocity. All measurements were done in PBS. For specific blocking of avidin–biotin interaction, the biotin residues on tip-bound IgG were masked by addition of free streptavidin (0.5 mg/mL final concentration) to the bath solution. The spring constants of the levers were determined by thermal noise method.[53,54]

Functionalization of Silicon Nitride Chips with Amino Groups, Acetal-PEG-NHS, and Biotin-IgG, with Quantitative Assay for Chip-Bound Biotin-IgG

Silicon nitride chips were precut, cleaned with chloroform (3×), dried with nitrogen, immersed in a piranha solution (70/30, H2SO4/H2O2, caution: piranha is extremely corrosive and can explode) for 30 min, extensively rinsed in water, dried with nitrogen, and heated to 160 °C for 5 min. The amino-functionalization was performed with the “room temperature method” as described before.(51) After washing in DMSO (3×) and ethanol (3×), the chips were dried in nitrogen and derivatized with acetal-PEG-NHS as described above for AFM tips. Cleavage of the acetal functions was always performed with citric acid (1%, in water, 1 or 15 min) and washing with water (3 × 5 min) or with iodine (0.1% in acetone, 5 min) and washing with acetone (3 × 5 min), as specified. Coupling of biotin-IgG was performed as described above for AFM tips, except that the concentration of biotin-IgG was varied as specified in the tables. Unused aldehyde functions were blocked with ethanolamine or with glycine, as specified. The surface density of biotin-IgG bound to the silicon nitride chips was determined by specific binding of ExtrAvidin-Peroxidase (EAP) as described before.(51) A detailed illustration of chip functionalization and estimation of its efficiency is found in the Supporting Information (Figure S6).

Results and Discussion

Synthesis of Acetal-PEG-NHS and Aldehyde-PEG-NHS

The synthesis route for the new cross-linker acetal-PEG-NHS followed the typical scheme for long heterobifunctional cross-linkers[25,38,50,51] in the sense that a short cross-linker (SDMB) was attached to the N-terminus of NH2-PEG-COOH in the first step (Figure 2a). To our knowledge, the short cross-linker SDMB has been synthesized for the first time (see Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). After removal of all small molecules (excess of SDMB, free NHS, TEA), the carboxyl group of acetal-PEG-COOH was converted into an NHS ester, resulting in the heterobifunctional cross-linker acetal-PEG-NHS (Figure 2b).
Figure 2

Synthesis of acetal-PEG-NHS and aldehyde-PEG-NHS. (a) NH2-PEG-COOH was reacted with SDMB to give acetal-PEG-COOH. (b) The terminal carboxyl function was activated by conversion into an NHS ester (acetal-PEG-NHS). (c) Previously published method of preparing aldehyde-PEG-COOH by use of SFB.(38) (d) New synthesis of aldehyde-PEG-COOH by cleavage of the acetal function. (e) Conversion of the terminal COOH group into an aminoreactive NHS ester (aldehyde-PEG-NHS). Experimental details of the syntheses are found in the Supporting Information.

Synthesis of acetal-PEG-NHS and aldehyde-PEG-NHS. (a) NH2-PEG-COOH was reacted with SDMB to give acetal-PEG-COOH. (b) The terminal carboxyl function was activated by conversion into an NHS ester (acetal-PEG-NHS). (c) Previously published method of preparing aldehyde-PEG-COOH by use of SFB.(38) (d) New synthesis of aldehyde-PEG-COOH by cleavage of the acetal function. (e) Conversion of the terminal COOH group into an aminoreactive NHS ester (aldehyde-PEG-NHS). Experimental details of the syntheses are found in the Supporting Information. As can be seen from Figure 2, the new module acetal-PEG-COOH served a second purpose also: cleavage of the acetal by iodine/acetone (0.1%, 10 min) or citric acid/water (1%, 10 min) afforded pure aldehyde-PEG-COOH (Figure 2d) which was easily converted into the previously published linker acetal-PEG-NHS (Figure 2e). In contrast to the new synthetic route (Figure 2a,d), the old method of reacting NH2-PEG-COOH with SFB (Figure 2c)(38) had given a significant fraction of Schiff base adducts besides the desired amide product; thus, a cumbersome extraction scheme was required for purification of aldehyde-PEG-COOH from undesired PEG derivatives.(38) The new synthetic route for preparation of the old linker aldehyde-PEG-NHS (Figure 2, steps a, d, and e) is important because the new linker acetal-PEG-NHS can replace the old one in most but not all AFM applications (see Figure 5).
Figure 5

Topographic and recognition imaging of uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) in planar supported bilayer with an ATP-functionalized AFM tip. (A) Reaction of tip-PEG-aldehyde with an ethylene diamine derivative of ATP (EDA-ATP) with concomitant reduction of the C=N bond by NaCNBH3. Topographic images (B) and simultaneously acquired recognition images (C) of two different bilayer patches (top and bottom strip) in the absence of free ATP. Topographic images (D) and simultaneously acquired recognition images (E) of the same sample areas as in (B) and (C) after the addition of free ATP (final concentration 4.8 mM).

AFM Tip Functionalization, Using Iodine/Acetone for Cleavage of Tip-Linked Acetal Functions

As can be seen from Figure 1, the essential improvement of the new tip functionalization method rests on the use of a masked aldehyde (i.e., an acetal) which remains unreactive while amide bonds are formed between the linker and the amino groups on the tip surface. In the next step, the acetal function on the free end of the tip-bound linker was converted into an amino-reactive benzaldehyde function (step d). Hereby, it was critical to select the mildest available method in order to prevent damage to the tip surface and to the light-reflecting metal film on the top side of the cantilever. In a recent study, it had been found that dimethylacetals of aromatic aldehydes are cleaved within 5 min by 0.6% iodine in anhydrous acetone under neutral conditions.(55) In the present study, we further lowered the iodine concentration to 0.1% and found it fully sufficient to completely deprotect acetal-PEG-COOH within 5–10 min in bulk solution (Figure 2, step d). Consequently, acetone with 0.1% iodine was also applied to tip-linked acetal functions (Figure 1, step d). After deprotection, the functionality of “tip-PEG-acetal” was examined by a established validation method:[25,38] Biotin-IgG was coupled to the tip-bound benzaldehyde functions (Figure 1, step e), using NaCNBH3 for concomitant fixation of the initially formed Schiff base bonds (see Figure S5). The tip was then mounted in the AFM and the ligand function of the biotin residues was tested by repeated approach to, and retraction from, the test sample which consisted of a dense monolayer of avidin, bound to mica by electrostatic adsorption (Figure 3A).(51) A typical example of the resulting force curves is shown in Figure 3B. The X-axis corresponds to the vertical movement of the piezo which carries the cantilever, while the Y-axis mirrors the deflection of the cantilever (converted into force values by multiplying the deflection amplitude with the force constant of the particular cantilever). During the approach (gray line), the cantilever is in the resting position up to the point of contact. Further approach causes upward bending of the cantilever. Retraction causes relaxation of cantilever bending, which does not stop at zero force but proceeds to negative values at further retraction. The reason is binding of a tip-tethered biotin residue to mica-bound avidin which causes progressive stretching of the PEG chain. At the critical force of 51 pN, the avidin–biotin bond is suddenly ruptured and the cantilever jumps to its resting position. The probability density function (pdf)(56) of 199 unbinding events (Figure 3D, solid line) shows the expected average avidin–biotin rupture force, as previously observed a the same force loading rate.[25,38,51] Force spectroscopy of single avidin–biotin interactions. (A) The AFM tip was functionalized with biotin-IgG, as outlined in Figure 1cd (or in greater detail in Figure S5, Supporting Information), using ethanolamine hydrochloride for tip amino-functionalization and iodine/acetone for cleavage of the acetal functions. In parallel, avidin was irreversibly adsorbed onto freshly cleaved mica. (B) Example of a force–distance cycle showing specific avidin–biotin unbinding. The piezo movement in the approach-and-retraction cycles was ±100 nm in 1 s, the force constant of the cantilever was 18 pN/nm, and the loading rate at unbinding was calculated as 1180 pN/s. Unbinding occurred at a rupture force of 51 pN and a tip–mica distance of 22 nm. (C) Example of a force–distance cycle performed in the presence of free streptavidin (0.5 mg/mL final concentration in PBS). (D) Probability density function (pdf) of the unbinding forces observed in 199 out of 948 force–distance cycles (solid line, 21% binding probability). In the presence of free streptavidin, only 3 out of 198 force–distance cycles showed apparent unbinding events (dashed gray trace, 1.5% binding probability). The specificity of avidin–biotin interaction was demonstrated by blocking the biotin residues on the tip with free streptavidin from solution. As a consequence, most force–distance cycles showed only upward bending of the cantilever (Figure 3C) and only 1.5% of the force distance cycles showed downward deflection, in contrast to 21% before the addition of free streptavidin. This difference in binding probability is reflected by the much lower area of the unbinding force distribution function in the presence of streptavidin (dashed gray line in Figure 3D), as compared to the condition with no streptavidin (solid line). For independent validation of the new tip functionalization method (Figure 1c,d,e), the procedure was applied to chips (5 mm × 5 mm) consisting of the same material as the AFM tips (Si3N4) and the area density of immobilized biotin-IgG was estimated from binding of EAP which is a conjugate between avidin and horse radish peroxidase.[25,38,51] Specific binding (Table 1, column 5) was calculated by subtracting nonspecific binding in the presence of free d-biotin (column 4) from total binding in the absence of free d-biotin (column 3). The results show that specific binding of EAP to immobilized biotin-IgG is far more pronounced than nonspecific adsorption. The actual numbers in columns 3–5 are similar as previously obtained with aldehyde-PEG-NHS,(38) except that aldehyde-PEG-NHS must be used at high concentrations (Figure 1b,e) in order to suppress loop formation on the surface (Figure 1a), whereas the new linker acetal-PEG-NHS can be used at the low concentration of 1 mg/mL (Table 1, column 1). From these findings, we conclude that all available amino groups on the tip surface fully react with the NHS ester function of acetal-PEG-NHS (1 mg/mL in chloroform with 0.5% TEA, 60 min), thereby eliminating the danger of loop formation on the tip surface when/after the acetal is converted into a benzaldehyde function in the next step (Figure 1d).
Table 1

Tethering of Biotinylated IgG to Silicon Nitride Chips via Acetal-PEG-NHS (Iodine Method)a

[PEG linker] (mg/mL)[biotin-IgG] (mg/mL)total sites (μm–2) bnonspecific sites (μm–2) bspecific sites (μm–2) b
12805 ± 12427 ± 4778 ± 143
102742 ± 8127 ± 4715 ± 94
10.15777 ± 136151 ± 51626 ± 153

Silicon nitride chips were derivatized according to the scheme shown in Figure S6. Ethanolamine hydrochloride was used for amino-functionalization of silicon nitride (step a in Figure S6). Iodine (0.1%, in acetone, 5 min) was applied for cleavage of the acetal function (step c).

The number of biotin-IgG molecules per μm2 (specific sites) was estimated from the difference EAP binding, measured in the absence (total sites, step f) and in the presence of free d-biotin (nonspecific sites, step e).

Silicon nitride chips were derivatized according to the scheme shown in Figure S6. Ethanolamine hydrochloride was used for amino-functionalization of silicon nitride (step a in Figure S6). Iodine (0.1%, in acetone, 5 min) was applied for cleavage of the acetal function (step c). The number of biotin-IgG molecules per μm2 (specific sites) was estimated from the difference EAP binding, measured in the absence (total sites, step f) and in the presence of free d-biotin (nonspecific sites, step e). Table 1 also shows that there is no need to use antibody concentrations higher than 0.15 mg/mL (column 2). The same phenomenon has been observed when other PEG linkers were used for antibody linking to AFM tips.[25,38] It was conclusively explained by weak preadsorption of protein to the tip surface, with the effect that one protein molecule adsorbed within reach of a 6-nm-long PEG linker has an effective local concentration of 3 mM.(25) As a consequence, very low protein concentrations suffice to equip all PEG linkers on the AFM tip with a protein molecule. In practice, we have seen efficient tip functionalization with ≥0.03 mg/mL antibody concentration (data not shown).

AFM Tip Functionalization, using Dilute Citric Acid for Cleavage of Tip-Linked Acetal Functions

The above-described method of tip functionalization has successfully been applied in several AFM laboratories when suddenly the users complained that the gold mirror on the top side of the cantilever got destroyed during tip functionalization. Detailed analysis showed that this destruction occurred during acetal cleavage with iodine/acetone (Figure 1d) and that it only happened with cantilevers purchased after the producer had changed the production method. As a consequence, several publications could only be finished by switching back to tip functionalization with aldehyde-PEG-NHS (Figure 1b,e).[39,41,49] In search for an alternative to iodine/acetone a study was found in which the diethylacetal of a PEG-linked benzaldehyde had completely been hydrolyzed within 5 h at pH 5, which had been adjusted with HCl.(57) This condition seemed promising in terms of mildness, but shorter reaction times and a more reliable way to adjust pH were required for practical purposes. For a first test, we treated acetal-PEG-COOH with 1% citric acid (pH 2.2, Figure S4) for 10 min and found that at least 99.6% (or more) of the acetal functions had been converted into benzaldehyde functions (see Supporting Information). Consequently, the AFM test experiment from Figure 3 was repeated, except that conversion of “tip-PEG-acetal” into “tip-PEG-aldehyde” was performed with 1% citric acid instead of iodine/acetone. The results are summarized in Figure 4. The unbinding force distribution shows the expected average unbinding force of ∼50 pN, as well as high binding probability (32.6%, solid line) before and low binding probability (4.4%, dashed line) after specific block of avidin–biotin interaction with excess of streptavidin.
Figure 4

Force measurements of single avidin–biotin interactions. Tip functionalization and force spectroscopy were performed as in Figure 3, except that citric acid (1%, in water, 15 min) was used in place of iodine/acetone for conversion of acetal into aldehyde functions. The piezo movement in the approach-and-retraction cycles was ±150 nm in 1 s, the force constant of the cantilever was 37 pN/nm, and the loading rate at unbinding was calculated as 720 pN/s. The graph shows the probability density function (pdf) of the unbinding forces observed in 321 out of 985 force–distance cycles (solid line, 32.6% binding probability). In the presence of free streptavidin, only 41 out of 938 force–distance cycles showed apparent unbinding events (dashed gray line, 4.4% binding probability).

Force measurements of single avidin–biotin interactions. Tip functionalization and force spectroscopy were performed as in Figure 3, except that citric acid (1%, in water, 15 min) was used in place of iodine/acetone for conversion of acetal into aldehyde functions. The piezo movement in the approach-and-retraction cycles was ±150 nm in 1 s, the force constant of the cantilever was 37 pN/nm, and the loading rate at unbinding was calculated as 720 pN/s. The graph shows the probability density function (pdf) of the unbinding forces observed in 321 out of 985 force–distance cycles (solid line, 32.6% binding probability). In the presence of free streptavidin, only 41 out of 938 force–distance cycles showed apparent unbinding events (dashed gray line, 4.4% binding probability). The modified tip functionalization protocol with 1% citric acid in place of iodine/acetone was again validated by imitation of tip functionalization on silicon nitride chips (Table 2). Columns 1 and 5 confirm the well-known trend that higher densities of amino groups are achieved with ethanolamine/DMSO as compared to gas-phase silanization with APTES.[51,52] In addition, the ethanolamine/DMSO method is less critical and easier to perform by newcomers. Nevertheless, the APTES method is to be preferred for high-quality AFM measurements.(58) When varying the incubation time with 1% citric acid (column 2), it was found that even the short time interval of 1 min was sufficient to deprotect 60–90% of the benzaldehyde functions on the chip (see column 5). From these data, it appears that 3–5 min of treatment with 1% citric acid is the best compromise between efficient acetal cleavage and minimal chemical stress on AFM tips.
Table 2

Tethering of Biotinylated IgG to Silicon Nitride Chips via Acetal-PEG-NHS (citric acid method).a

amino-functionalization1% citric acid (min)total sites (μm–2) bnonspecific sites (μm–2) bspecific sites (μm–2) b
ethanolamine11389 ± 146159 ± 491230 ± 169
 151486 ± 151159 ± 491327 ± 185
APTES1645 ± 141118 ± 27527 ± 163
 151009 ± 95118 ± 27891 ± 117

Silicon nitride chips were derivatized according to the scheme shown in Figure S6. The concentration of acetal-PEG-NHS was 1 mg/mL (step b in Figure S6). Citric acid (1%, in water, treatment time either 1 or 15 min) was applied for cleavage of the acetal function (step c). The concentration of biotin-IgG was 0.22 mg/mL (step d).

The number of biotin-IgG molecules per μm2 (specific sites) was estimated from the difference in EAP binding, measured in the absence (total sites, step f) and in the presence of free d-biotin (nonspecific sites, step e).

Silicon nitride chips were derivatized according to the scheme shown in Figure S6. The concentration of acetal-PEG-NHS was 1 mg/mL (step b in Figure S6). Citric acid (1%, in water, treatment time either 1 or 15 min) was applied for cleavage of the acetal function (step c). The concentration of biotin-IgG was 0.22 mg/mL (step d). The number of biotin-IgG molecules per μm2 (specific sites) was estimated from the difference in EAP binding, measured in the absence (total sites, step f) and in the presence of free d-biotin (nonspecific sites, step e). Table 3 addresses the question regarding whether it is necessary to block potentially unused benzaldehyde functions on the AFM tip. Now, all chips were amino-functionalized with APTES in the gas phase, followed by reaction with acetal-PEG-NHS, cleavage of tip-bound acetal functions with 1% citric acid, and coupling of biotin-IgG to the resulting benzaldehyde functions on the chip. In case unused benzaldehyde functions are present on the chip surface, this should lead to covalent coupling of the ExtrAvidin-Peroxidase (EAP), which we use for “counting” of the biotin-IgG molecules on the chip surface. Such covalent coupling would contribute to nonspecific binding (column 4 in Table 3), in contrast to the specific interaction of EAP with biotin-IgG (column 5) which is blocked by excess of free d-biotin. Previously, it was shown that the terminal benzaldehyde is efficiently blocked by free ethanolamine in presence of NaCNBH3.(38) Now, free ethanolamine was applied after coupling of biotin-IgG (lines 3 and 4) and compared to controls in which no attempt was made to block unused benzaldehyde functions (lines 1 and 2). However, no significant difference was found with respect to the extent of nonspecific binding. The same result was also obtained when glycine was used in place of ethanolamine (lines 5 and 6).
Table 3

Comparison of Different Methods for Blocking of Unused Aldehyde Functions (citric acid method).a

blocking methodTween 20dtotal sites (μm–2) enonspecific sites (μm–2) especific sites (μm–2) e
none-933 ± 133142 ± 39791 ± 92
 +898 ± 34496 ± 17802 ± 344
ethanolamine b-775 ± 24146 ± 28629 ± 37
 +715 ± 107138 ± 26577 ± 110
glycine c-1053 ± 34581 ± 12972 ± 345
 +865 ± 14690 ± 32775 ± 149

Silicon nitride chips were derivatized according to the scheme shown in Figure S6. APTES was used for amino-functionalization of the silicon nitride chips (step a in Figure S6). The concentration of acetal-PEG-NHS was 1 mg/mL (step b). Citric acid (1%, in water, 15 min) was used for cleavage of the acetal function (step c). The concentration of biotin-IgG was 0.15 mg/mL (step d).

Ethanolamine hydrochloride (0.05 volumes of a 1 M stock solution, adjusted to pH 9.6 with NaOH) or

glycine (0.05 volumes of a 1 M stock solution, adjusted to pH 8.3 with NaOH) was added to the biotin-IgG solution on the AFM tips after 1 h incubation and allowed to react for 10 min (step f in Figure S5).

The minus or plus signs indicate absence or presence of Tween 20 (0.1%) during incubation with EAP. In any case, Tween 20 was used in the subsequent washing steps.

The number of biotin-IgG molecules per μm2 (specific sites) was estimated from the difference in EAP binding, measured in the absence (total sites, step f in Figure S6) and in the presence of free d-biotin (nonspecific sites, step e in Figure S6).

Silicon nitride chips were derivatized according to the scheme shown in Figure S6. APTES was used for amino-functionalization of the silicon nitride chips (step a in Figure S6). The concentration of acetal-PEG-NHS was 1 mg/mL (step b). Citric acid (1%, in water, 15 min) was used for cleavage of the acetal function (step c). The concentration of biotin-IgG was 0.15 mg/mL (step d). Ethanolamine hydrochloride (0.05 volumes of a 1 M stock solution, adjusted to pH 9.6 with NaOH) or glycine (0.05 volumes of a 1 M stock solution, adjusted to pH 8.3 with NaOH) was added to the biotin-IgG solution on the AFM tips after 1 h incubation and allowed to react for 10 min (step f in Figure S5). The minus or plus signs indicate absence or presence of Tween 20 (0.1%) during incubation with EAP. In any case, Tween 20 was used in the subsequent washing steps. The number of biotin-IgG molecules per μm2 (specific sites) was estimated from the difference in EAP binding, measured in the absence (total sites, step f in Figure S6) and in the presence of free d-biotin (nonspecific sites, step e in Figure S6). Lines 1, 3, and 5 in Table 3 differ from all chip functionalization assays in this and previous studies[25,38,51,52] by omission of Tween 20 in the incubation step with ExtrAvidin-Peroxidase (EAP). Absence of detergent was expected to enhance adsorption, and thereby also to accelerate covalent coupling of EAP to surface-bound benzaldehyde residues,(25) in case not all of them had reacted with biotin-IgG in the preceding step. The data in Table 3, however, do not show a significant difference in the extent of nonspecific binding of EAP to the chip surface, whether Tween 20 was present or not (columns 2 and 4). It is, therefore, concluded that nonspecific binding was merely caused by physical adsorption of ExtrAvidin-Peroxidase and not by covalent coupling to unused benzaldehyde functions. With respect to AFM tip functionalization, this means that all (or almost all) benzaldehyde groups on the tip surface appear to react with a protein molecule under the standardized reaction conditions and that blocking of putatively unused benzaldehyde groups is merely optional. In case blocking is desired, glycine is to be preferred over ethanolamine, because the lower pKa of glycine allows for a more neutral pH during the blocking step (see legend to Table 3). An alternate method for blocking of potentially unused aldehyde functions at pH ∼ 7.7 is described in the Supporting Information (part 4).

Rapid Imaging of Mitochondrial Uncoupling Protein with ATP-Functionalized AFM Tips

As describe above, citric acid (1%) allows for conversion of “tip-PEG-acetal” into “tip-PEG-aldehyde” without adverse effects on standard AFM cantilevers. Unfortunately, this is not true for MAC levers, the magnetic coating of which has been observed damaged to variable degrees by treatment with 1% citric acid (data not shown). MAC levers are indispensable for simultaneous “topography and recognition imaging” (TREC). In the so-called TREC mode, a biofunctionalized tip is magnetically oscillated near its resonance frequency while rapidly scanning the sample surface. Hereby, topographic features dampen the downward amplitudes of tip oscillation, while recognition of a target molecule on the sample surface by a tip-bound sensor molecule causes stretching of the PEG linker between the tip and the sensor molecule, which dampens the upward amplitudes of tip oscillation. Consequently, the envelope of the lower amplitudes yields the topographic image (Figure 5B), while the envelope of the upper amplitudes yields a map of recognition sites (Figure 5C). A more detailed explanation of the TREC imaging method can be found at the end of the Supporting Information. Topographic and recognition imaging of uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) in planar supported bilayer with an ATP-functionalized AFM tip. (A) Reaction of tip-PEG-aldehyde with an ethylene diamine derivative of ATP (EDA-ATP) with concomitant reduction of the C=N bond by NaCNBH3. Topographic images (B) and simultaneously acquired recognition images (C) of two different bilayer patches (top and bottom strip) in the absence of free ATP. Topographic images (D) and simultaneously acquired recognition images (E) of the same sample areas as in (B) and (C) after the addition of free ATP (final concentration 4.8 mM). Given the poor resistance of the magnetic coating of MAC levers to 1% citric acid, the new tip functionalization protocol with acetal-PEG-NHS cannot be applied to tips used for recognition imaging, and the older method with aldehyde-PEG-NHS must be used instead.(38) Nevertheless, the present study provides for a major improvement of the older method, albeit in an indirect way. Figure 2 depicts a new route for the synthesis of the old linker aldehyde-PEG-NHS (steps a, d, and e). Previously, the old linker was prepared by reaction of NH2-PEG-COOH with succinimidyl formylbenzoate (SFB, step c). Unfortunately, SFB has two amino-reactive ends, thus several side products are formed in the reaction with NH2-PEG-COOH which are difficult to remove and cause low yields of aldehyde-PEG-COOH. No such problem is encountered when reacting the new module SDMB with NH2-PEG-COOH (step a) because it possesses only one amino-reactive group. Consequently, the yield of acetal-PEG-COOH is high and the intermediate is obtained in good yield. Cleavage of the acetal function (step d) and activation of the terminal carboxyl (step e) are also simple, thus the old linker aldehyde-PEG-NHS is obtained in high yield from the valuable starting material NH2-PEG-COOH. For the “proof of principle”, the binding of ATP to the mitochondrial uncoupling protein, UCP1, was studied.(59) UCP1 is an anion transporter, which dissipates the mitochondrial inner membrane proton gradient and can be inhibited by di- or triphosphate nucleotides. Although some plausible models were proposed (for review, see Krauss et al.(60)), the exact mechanism of UCP1 inhibition remains unknown. In the absence of the protein crystallographic structure, the studies using tip-tethered ATP molecules are a powerful tool to elucidate different parameters of ATP-UCP interaction, such as location of the nucleotide binding site inside the membrane and a binding force of the nucleotide-protein interaction. The latter is a subject of our subsequent study. The newly synthesized “old linker” acetal-PEG-NHS was used for flexible attachment of an ATP derivative to a MAC lever, as depicted in Figure 5A (for details, see Supporting Information). The functionalized tip was scanned over a mica-supported phospholipid bilayer which contained purified UCP1. The individual UCP1 molecules were nicely visible as round structures of defined size in the topographic image (Figure 5B). The specific recognition of the ATP-binding sites is mirrored in the recognition image (Figure 5C) of the TREC mode. For the competitive blocking of ATP-binding sites in the control experiment, 4.8 mM of free ATP was added to the buffer solution before scanning. Figure 5D shows that the protein spots in the topographic image persisted, whereas only very dim shadows with the opposite amplitude were observed in the recognition image (Figure 5E), revealing the tiny amplitude of the spillover from the topographic image into the recognition image. The complete loss of the recognition after addition of free ATP (Figure 5E) clearly confirms that all recognition spots in Figure 5C were caused by specific binding of tip-linked ATP to UCP1 molecules in the planar lipid membrane.

Conclusions

The present study offers an uncompromised and simple solution to the nontrivial problem of linking the NH2 groups of biomolecules to the NH2 groups of amino-functionalized AFM tips. In contrast to previous methods, a bifunctional linker with a single amino-reactive end is used which is reacted with all available NH2 groups on the tip surface. Subsequently, the free-tangling end of the PEG linker is converted into an amino-reactive aldehyde function which provides for coupling of sensor molecules via their NH2 functions. In this way, the undesired cross-linking of adjacent NH2 functions on the tip surface is perfectly avoided. The method is particularly suited for proteins, which are usually abundant in lysine residues. Other obvious applications are synthetic oligonucleotides with NH2 groups on their 5′ or 3′ end, as well as small biomolecules or drugs with endogenous or artificially introduced amino functions. The only weak point of the new tip functionalization protocol is the adverse effect of the acetal-to-aldehyde conversion step on the magnetic coating of cantilevers which are needed for fast imaging of recognition sites on the sample surface. Such cantilevers must be functionalized with the old linker aldehyde-PEG-NHS. Nevertheless, this older method has also profited from the present study because a simpler and more efficient synthesis route to aldehyde-PEG-NHS was found. The experiments with reconstituted UCP1 demonstrate a great application potential of recognition force microscopy for the functional studies of biomolecules which is not easily gained from other techniques.
  54 in total

1.  Imaging streptavidin 2D crystals on biotinylated lipid monolayers at high resolution with the atomic force microscope.

Authors:  S Scheuring; D. J Muller; P Ringler; J. B Heymann; A Engel
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.758

2.  Transport kinetics of uncoupling proteins. Analysis of UCP1 reconstituted in planar lipid bilayers.

Authors:  Eva Urbánková; Anna Voltchenko; Peter Pohl; Petr Jezek; Elena E Pohl
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-06-24       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Single-molecule recognition imaging microscopy.

Authors:  C Stroh; H Wang; R Bash; B Ashcroft; J Nelson; H Gruber; D Lohr; S M Lindsay; P Hinterdorfer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A generic chemical platform for molecular recognition and stimuli-responsive probes based on scanning probe microscopy.

Authors:  Francesca Cecchet; Perrine Lussis; Christine Jérôme; Sabine Gabriel; Elsa Silva-Goncalves; Robert Jérôme; Anne-Sophie Duwez
Journal:  Small       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 13.281

5.  Data analysis of interaction forces measured with the atomic force microscope

Authors: 
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.689

6.  Molecular recognition forces between immunoglobulin G and a surface protein adhesin on living Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Ahmed Touhami; Manfred H Jericho; Terry J Beveridge
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 3.882

7.  Protein-resistant self-assembled monolayers on gold with latent aldehyde functions.

Authors:  Martin Hölzl; Ali Tinazli; Christa Leitner; Christoph D Hahn; Bernd Lackner; Robert Tampé; Hermann J Gruber
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2007-04-14       Impact factor: 3.882

8.  Antibody linking to atomic force microscope tips via disulfide bond formation.

Authors:  A S M Kamruzzahan; Andreas Ebner; Linda Wildling; Ferry Kienberger; Christian K Riener; Christoph D Hahn; Philipp D Pollheimer; Peter Winklehner; Martin Hölzl; Bernd Lackner; Daniela M Schörkl; Peter Hinterdorfer; Hermann J Gruber
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.774

9.  A new, simple method for linking of antibodies to atomic force microscopy tips.

Authors:  Andreas Ebner; Linda Wildling; A S M Kamruzzahan; Christian Rankl; Jürgen Wruss; Christoph D Hahn; Martin Hölzl; Rong Zhu; Ferry Kienberger; Dieter Blaas; Peter Hinterdorfer; Hermann J Gruber
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 4.774

10.  Nanomechanical recognition measurements of individual DNA molecules reveal epigenetic methylation patterns.

Authors:  Rong Zhu; Stefan Howorka; Johannes Pröll; Ferry Kienberger; Johannes Preiner; Jan Hesse; Andreas Ebner; Vassili Ph Pastushenko; Hermann J Gruber; Peter Hinterdorfer
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 39.213

View more
  49 in total

1.  Endothelial Glycocalyx-Mediated Nitric Oxide Production in Response to Selective AFM Pulling.

Authors:  Anne Marie W Bartosch; Rick Mathews; John M Tarbell
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Nanomechanical mapping of first binding steps of a virus to animal cells.

Authors:  David Alsteens; Richard Newton; Rajib Schubert; David Martinez-Martin; Martin Delguste; Botond Roska; Daniel J Müller
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 39.213

3.  Regulation of Active ICAM-4 on Normal and Sickle Cell Disease RBCs via AKAPs Is Revealed by AFM.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Krithika Abiraman; Sasia-Marie Jones; George Lykotrafitis; Biree Andemariam
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Cleavage and cell adhesion properties of human epithelial cell adhesion molecule (HEPCAM).

Authors:  Thanos Tsaktanis; Heidi Kremling; Miha Pavšič; Ricarda von Stackelberg; Brigitte Mack; Akio Fukumori; Harald Steiner; Franziska Vielmuth; Volker Spindler; Zhe Huang; Jasmine Jakubowski; Nikolas H Stoecklein; Elke Luxenburger; Kirsten Lauber; Brigita Lenarčič; Olivier Gires
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Combining confocal and atomic force microscopy to quantify single-virus binding to mammalian cell surfaces.

Authors:  Richard Newton; Martin Delguste; Melanie Koehler; Andra C Dumitru; Pawel R Laskowski; Daniel J Müller; David Alsteens
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  Lipid-dependent conformational dynamics underlie the functional versatility of T-cell receptor.

Authors:  Xingdong Guo; Chengsong Yan; Hua Li; Wenmao Huang; Xiaoshan Shi; Min Huang; Yingfang Wang; Weiling Pan; Mingjun Cai; Lunyi Li; Wei Wu; Yibing Bai; Chi Zhang; Zhijun Liu; Xinyan Wang; Xiaohui F Zhang; Chun Tang; Hongda Wang; Wanli Liu; Bo Ouyang; Catherine C Wong; Yi Cao; Chenqi Xu
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 25.617

7.  Desmosomal Hyperadhesion Is Accompanied with Enhanced Binding Strength of Desmoglein 3 Molecules.

Authors:  Michael Fuchs; Anna Magdalena Sigmund; Jens Waschke; Franziska Vielmuth
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Inhibition of mitochondrial UCP1 and UCP3 by purine nucleotides and phosphate.

Authors:  Gabriel Macher; Melanie Koehler; Anne Rupprecht; Jürgen Kreiter; Peter Hinterdorfer; Elena E Pohl
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.747

9.  Reovirus σ1 Conformational Flexibility Modulates the Efficiency of Host Cell Attachment.

Authors:  Julia R Diller; Sean R Halloran; Melanie Koehler; Rita Dos Santos Natividade; David Alsteens; Thilo Stehle; Terence S Dermody; Kristen M Ogden
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Unraveling the nanoscale surface properties of chitin synthase mutants of Aspergillus fumigatus and their biological implications.

Authors:  David Alsteens; Vishukumar Aimanianda; Pushpa Hegde; Stéphane Pire; Rémi Beau; Jagadeesh Bayry; Jean-Paul Latgé; Yves F Dufrêne
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.