Literature DB >> 21541464

Assessment of methods to identify protein-energy wasting in patients on hemodialysis.

Patrícia Marçal Vegine1, Ana Carolina Packness Fernandes, Márcia Regina Simas Gonçalves Torres, Maria Inês Barreto Silva, Carla Maria Avesani.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The method capable of best identifying protein-energy wasting (PEW) in hemodialysis (HD) patients is controversial. Thus, we assessed the nutritional status of HD patients by use of different methods and verified which one identified the highest number of patients with PEW.
METHODS: The study assessed the nutritional status of 15 HD patients (age: 52.7 ± 10.1 years; males: 33.3%) by use of anthropometric measurements, subjective global assessment (SGA), serum albumin, and dietary intake (24-hour food recall). Body fat was assessed by use of anthropometry. The International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism (ISRNM) criteria were used to diagnose PEW.
RESULTS: The body mass index (24.2 ± 4.4 kg/m²) and the percentage of standard value for mid-arm muscle circumference were within the normal limits (102.6 ± 13%). Nevertheless, the percentage of standard value for triceps skinfold was below the normal limits (females, 75.3 ± 40.4%; and males, 73.5 ± 20.6%), although a high body fat percentage was observed (females, 34.5 ± 7.3%; males, 23.6 ± 4.2%). When assessing the nutritional status by use of SGA, most patients (80%, n = 12) were malnourished, and SGA was the method that identified the highest number of patients with PEW. By using the ISRNM criteria, PEW was diagnosed in only two patients.
CONCLUSION: All patients were diagnosed with PEW by use of one of the methods studied. The SGA was the method that, in isolation, could detect the greatest number of patients with PEW.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21541464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bras Nefrol        ISSN: 0101-2800


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of various scoring methods for the diagnosis of protein-energy wasting in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  A As'habi; H Tabibi; B Nozary-Heshmati; M Mahdavi-Mazdeh; M Hedayati
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Comparison of novel risk factors for cardiovascular disease between hemodialysis patients with and without protein-energy wasting.

Authors:  Hadi Tabibi; Atefeh As'habi; Mitra Mahdavi-Mazdeh; Mehdi Hedayati; Behnaz Nozary-Heshmati
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Comparison of Subjective Global Assessment and Protein Energy Wasting Score to Nutrition Evaluations Conducted by Registered Dietitian Nutritionists in Identifying Protein Energy Wasting Risk in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients.

Authors:  Simon Siu-Man Sum; Andrea F Marcus; Debra Blair; Laura A Olejnik; Joyce Cao; J Scott Parrott; Emily N Peters; Rosa K Hand; Laura D Byham-Gray
Journal:  J Ren Nutr       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.655

4.  Effect of parathyroidectomy on bone tissue biomarkers and body composition in patients with chronic kidney disease and secondary hyperparathyroidism.

Authors:  Flavia Ramos de Siqueira; Karin Carneiro de Oliveira; Wagner Vasques Dominguez; César Augusto Madid Truyts; Rosa Maria Affonso Moysés; Luciene Machado Dos Reis; Vanda Jorgetti
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Comparison of dietary intake patterns in hemodialysis patients by nutritional status: A cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Ji Eun Lee; Hyun-Jung Kim; Mi Jung Lee; Young Eun Kwon; Min-Sook Kyung; Jung-Tak Park; Jung Pyo Lee; Su-Hyun Kim; Jung-Hyun Kim; Hyung Jung Oh; Dong-Ryeol Ryu
Journal:  Kidney Res Clin Pract       Date:  2020-06-30

6.  Kidney cachexia or protein-energy wasting in chronic kidney disease: facts and numbers.

Authors:  Laetitia Koppe; Denis Fouque; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 12.910

7.  Markers of protein-energy wasting and physical performance in haemodialysis patients: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Karsten Vanden Wyngaert; Bert Celie; Patrick Calders; Sunny Eloot; Els Holvoet; Wim Van Biesen; Amaryllis H Van Craenenbroeck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.