Literature DB >> 21541200

An evidence-based mobile decision support system for subaxial cervical spine injury treatment.

P L Kubben1, H van Santbrink, E M J Cornips, A R Vaccaro, M F Dvorak, L W van Rhijn, A J J A Scherpbier, H Hoogland.   

Abstract

Bringing evidence to practice is a key issue in modern medicine. The key barrier to information searching is time. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) can improve guideline adherence. Mounting evidence exists that mobile CDSS on handheld computers support physicians in delivering appropriate care to their patients. Subaxial cervical spine injuries account for almost half of spine injuries, and a majority of spinal cord injuries. A valid and reliable classification exists, including evidence-based treatment algorithms. A mobile CDSS on this topic was not yet available. We developed and tested an iPhone application based on the Subaxial Injury Classification (SLIC) and 5 evidence-based treatment algorithms for the surgical approach to subaxial cervical spine injuries. The application can be downloaded for free. Users are cordially invited to provide feedback in order to direct further development and evaluation of CDSS for traumatic lesions of the spinal column.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision support; handheld; iPhone; mobile computing; subaxial cervical spine injury

Year:  2011        PMID: 21541200      PMCID: PMC3086168          DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.78238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Neurol Int        ISSN: 2152-7806


INTRODUCTION

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has been described as “the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients. It means integrating expert opinion and patient preference with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research.”[18] Mobilizing knowledge to action and bringing such evidence to practice is a key issue in modern medicine. A survey in the United States demonstrated that only 55% of patients received recommended care.[12] A review of physician guideline adherence shows that volume of information and time needed to stay informed are recurrent barriers.[422] Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) have repeatedly been suggested as a useful tool for improving guideline adherence and mobilizing evidence-based knowledge into daily clinical practice.[1391920] Handheld computers provide mobile decision support that may facilitate this process.[1415] Subaxial cervical spine injuries are common and even among specialists there is demonstrated wide variation in what is viewed as the most appropriate treatment for these injuries.[8] The Subaxial Injury Classification (SLIC) is a valid and reliable classification system for subaxial spine trauma consisting of 3 categories: injury morphology, disco-ligamentous complex, and neurologic status.[21] When the SLIC score is larger than 4, operative treatment is recommended, consisting of realignment, neurologic decompression (if indicated), and stabilization.[21] Evidence-based algorithms for surgical approaches have been developed based on a systematic review of the literature, expert opinion, and anticipated patient preferences.[7] The use of SLIC to classify injuries and use of the algorithms to assist in determining therapeutic approaches would likely improve evidence-based practice. This article presents a mobile CDSS that will assist in diagnosis and evidence-based surgical treatment of subaxial cervical spine injury, based on the SLIC classification and associated algorithms for the surgical approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Algorithms

The algorithms were taken from the article by Dvorak et al.[7] A separate description of the SLIC scale is based on the article by Vaccaro et al.[21]

Software development and testing

Software was developed by the first author in XCode 3.1 and the iPhone SDK (Apple Inc, Cupertino, CA). Some sample code from Mark and LaMarche was used.[10] The SLIC scale description was made using Google Docs (Google Inc, Mountain View, CA) and exported to an HTML file. Usability testing was performed by 2 neurosurgeons and an orthopedic surgeon on an iPhone 3GS running OS 3.1.2 (the application requires OS 3.0 or higher).

Further evaluation

Suggestions for improvement related to educational value and ease of use were provided by the Department of Medical Education. Additional feedback was provided by 2 orthopedic surgeons who have extensive experience with the SLIC scale.

RESULTS

The application offers a selection of 5 evidence-based algorithms [Figure 1] that can be browsed in Decision Support mode [Figure 2] or Chart mode [Figure 3]. The chart can be zoomed in and out by using multitouch gestures, a feature of the iPhone. Moreover, when rotating the device to landscape mode, it will show an overview of the SLIC scale and its references.
Figure 1

Overview of available treatment algorithms

Figure 2

Browsing an algorithm in Decision Support mode

Figure 3

Browsing an algorithm in Chart mode. The chart can be zoomed in and out by finger pinching

Overview of available treatment algorithms Browsing an algorithm in Decision Support mode Browsing an algorithm in Chart mode. The chart can be zoomed in and out by finger pinching The application has been modified according to suggestions made during usability testing, which mainly consisted of simplifying the navigation structure. No official clinical evaluation has been performed to date.

DISCUSSION

According to the PubMed Indexing Statistics, the number of journals indexed in the Index Medicus more than doubled between 1965 and 2009 and the number of citations yearly added to MEDLINE increased almost fivefold.[13] The total number of MEDLINE citations has passed 17 million now. What is not known with certainty is the clinical impact of these articles and whether they influence clinical practice. Citation indices are neither capable of measuring quality nor clinical impact of publications.[6] There is little evidence suggesting that evidence-based reviews and case series from databases are effective in enhancing evidence uptake or changing clinician behavior.[23] Reviews on the information-seeking behavior of clinicians show that the key barrier to information searching is time.[522] In practice, if the search takes more than 2 minutes it will not produce information suitable for that patient consultation.[5] This time-dependent availability of information may be even more critical in the emergency setting. Deviations from what are known to be preferred treatment guidelines for basic care may pose serious threats to public health.[121620] Strategies to reduce these deviations from best practices are warranted.[1220] Health Policy decision makers, patients, and care givers are all demanding increased quality of health care and a reduction in the number of medical errors. Evidence-based guidelines may summarize the best care available, but they do not provide explicit methods to bring proven therapies to the bedside. Information technology can assist in achieving this goal. Increased use of information technology may improve medical care and the efficacy of its delivery. CDSS have been shown to improve appropriateness of antimicrobial selection for acute respiratory tract infections.[19] They have been suggested as a tool to improve EBM adoption.[1] Unfortunately, as quality of most CDSS studies is limited, no general conclusions can be made. Handheld computers, also called Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs), have been purported to increase productivity and improve patient care in recent years.[21117] A recent multicenter randomized trial demonstrated a significant increase in guideline adherence when using a mobile (handheld) CDSS in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.[15] Mounting evidence suggests that physician guideline adherence can be improved by offering (mobile) CDSS. The major barrier between evidence and practice is time: information access needs to be quick and to the point. Subaxial cervical spine injury is an emergency requiring urgent diagnosis and a therapeutic plan. Evidence-based algorithms are available, and can be used as guidelines for treatment. The SLIC iPhone application offers a mobile CDSS that can facilitate diagnosis, and improve adherence to evidence-based treatment algorithms. It is available as a free download from the App Store. Users are cordially invited to provide feedback in order to direct further development and evaluation of CDSS for traumatic lesions of the spinal column.

CONCLUSION

Evidence-based practice can benefit from mobile CDSS to improve physician guideline adherence. Subaxial cervical spine injury is an emergency requiring urgent diagnosis and a therapeutic plan. A valid and reliable classification (SLIC) and corresponding evidence-based treatment algorithms are available. A mobile CDSS is presented that can facilitate the use of this classification and these treatment algorithms.
  21 in total

Review 1.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States.

Authors:  Elizabeth A McGlynn; Steven M Asch; John Adams; Joan Keesey; Jennifer Hicks; Alison DeCristofaro; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality.

Authors:  David W Bates; Gilad J Kuperman; Samuel Wang; Tejal Gandhi; Anne Kittler; Lynn Volk; Cynthia Spurr; Ramin Khorasani; Milenko Tanasijevic; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-08-04       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Personal digital assistants in health care: experienced clinicians in the palm of your hand?

Authors:  Daniel C Baumgart
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Better care for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Harold C Sox
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Clinical decision support and appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Matthew H Samore; Kim Bateman; Stephen C Alder; Elizabeth Hannah; Sharon Donnelly; Gregory J Stoddard; Bassam Haddadin; Michael A Rubin; Jacquelyn Williamson; Barry Stults; Randall Rupper; Kurt Stevenson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Doctors' experience with handheld computers in clinical practice: qualitative study.

Authors:  Ann Scheck McAlearney; Sharon B Schweikhart; Mitchell A Medow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-15

8.  Appropriateness of diagnostic management and outcomes of suspected pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Pierre-Marie Roy; Guy Meyer; Bruno Vielle; Catherine Le Gall; Franck Verschuren; Françoise Carpentier; Philippe Leveau; Alain Furber
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  The use and effectiveness of electronic clinical decision support tools in the ambulatory/primary care setting: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Cathy Bryan; Suzanne Austin Boren
Journal:  Inform Prim Care       Date:  2008

10.  Personal digital assistants change management more often than paper texts and foster patient confidence.

Authors:  Scott E Rudkin; Mark I Langdorf; Demian Macias; Jennifer A Oman; Amin A Kazzi
Journal:  Eur J Emerg Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.799

View more
  5 in total

1.  Pilot Evaluation of a Tablet-Based Application to Improve Quality of Care in Child Mental Health Treatment.

Authors:  Tatiana M Davidson; Brian E Bunnell; Benjamin E Saunders; Rochelle F Hanson; Carla K Danielson; Danna Cook; Brian C Chu; Shannon Dorsey; Zachary W Adams; Arthur R Andrews; Jesse H Walker; Kathryn E Soltis; Judith A Cohen; Esther Deblinger; Kenneth J Ruggiero
Journal:  Behav Ther       Date:  2018-07-27

2.  SLIC 2: Improved decision support for subaxial cervical spine injury.

Authors:  Pieter L Kubben
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-03-14

3.  Development and Pilot Evaluation of a Tablet-Based Application to Improve Quality of Care in Child Mental Health Treatment.

Authors:  Kenneth J Ruggiero; Brian E Bunnell; Arthur R Andrews Iii; Tatiana M Davidson; Rochelle F Hanson; Carla Kmett Danielson; Benjamin E Saunders; Kathryn Soltis; Caleb Yarian; Brian Chu; Zachary W Adams
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2015-12-30

4.  Smartphones and Medical Applications in the Emergency Department Daily Practice.

Authors:  Amirhosein Jahanshir; Ehsan Karimialavijeh; Hojjat Sheikh; Motahar Vahedi; Mehdi Momeni
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2017-01-09

5.  Smartphone and medical related App use among medical students and junior doctors in the United Kingdom (UK): a regional survey.

Authors:  Karl Frederick Braekkan Payne; Heather Wharrad; Kim Watts
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 2.796

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.