Literature DB >> 16461959

Appropriateness of diagnostic management and outcomes of suspected pulmonary embolism.

Pierre-Marie Roy1, Guy Meyer, Bruno Vielle, Catherine Le Gall, Franck Verschuren, Françoise Carpentier, Philippe Leveau, Alain Furber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: International guidelines include several strategies for diagnosing pulmonary embolism with confidence, but little is known about how these guidelines are implemented in routine practice.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the appropriateness of diagnostic management of suspected pulmonary embolism and the relationship between diagnostic criteria and outcome.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with a 3-month follow-up.
SETTING: 116 emergency departments in France and 1 in Belgium. PATIENTS: 1529 consecutive outpatients with suspected pulmonary embolism. MEASUREMENTS: Appropriateness of diagnostic criteria according to international guidelines; incidence of thromboembolic events during follow-up.
RESULTS: Diagnostic management was inappropriate in 662 (43%) patients: 36 of 429 (8%) patients with confirmed pulmonary embolism and 626 of 1100 (57%) patients in whom pulmonary embolism was ruled out. Independent risk factors for inappropriate management were age older than 75 years (adjusted odds ratio, 2.27 [95% CI, 1.48 to 3.47]), known heart failure (odds ratio, 1.53 [CI, 1.11 to 2.12]), chronic lung disease (odds ratio, 1.39 [CI, 1.00 to 1.94]), current or recent pregnancy (odds ratio, 5.92 [CI, 1.81 to 19.30]), currently receiving anticoagulant treatment (odds ratio, 4.57 [CI, 2.51 to 8.31]), and the lack of a written diagnostic algorithm and clinical probability scoring in the emergency department (odds ratio, 2.54 [CI, 1.51 to 4.28]). Among patients who did not receive anticoagulant treatment, 44 had a thromboembolic event during follow-up: 5 of 418 (1.2%) patients who received appropriate management and 39 of 506 (7.7%) patients who received inappropriate management (absolute risk difference, 6.5 percentage points [CI, 4.0 to 9.1 percentage points]; P < 0.001). Inappropriateness was independently associated with thromboembolism occurrence (adjusted odds ratio, 4.29 [CI, 1.45 to 12.70]). LIMITATIONS: This was an observational study without evaluation of the risk for overdiagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic management that does not adhere to guidelines is frequent and harmful in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Several risk factors for inappropriateness constitute useful findings for subsequent interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16461959     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-3-200602070-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  40 in total

Review 1.  Acute pulmonary embolism. Part 1: epidemiology and diagnosis.

Authors:  Renée A Douma; Pieter W Kamphuisen; Harry R Büller
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  D-dimer for the diagnosis of acute venous thromboembolism in the emergency department: a Janus-face marker.

Authors:  Roberto Manfredini
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Should we regionalize the management of pulmonary embolism?

Authors:  Marc Carrier; Philip S Wells
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Comparison of non-invasive diagnostic tests to multi-detector CT pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Naeem Firdous; Prashant Nasa; Avdhesh Bansal; Deven Juneja; Manjit Singh Kanwar; Moti Lal Bera
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dis Res       Date:  2013-02-27

5.  A new diagnostic marker for acute pulmonary embolism in emergency department: mean platelet volume.

Authors:  Fahrettin Talay; Tarık Ocak; Aytekin Alcelik; Kurşat Erkuran; Akcan Akkaya; Arif Duran; Abdullah Demirhan; Ozlem Kar Kurt; Zehra Asuk
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.927

6.  Diagnostic validity of hematologic parameters in evaluation of massive pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Hale Ates; Ihsan Ates; Harun Kundi; Fatma Meric Yilmaz
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.352

7.  Outcome of patients with pulmonary embolism admitted to the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Hadeel Al Otair; Mohammed Chaudhry; Shaffi Shaikh; Ahmed Bahammam
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.219

8.  Hospital volume and patient outcomes in pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Drahomir Aujesky; Maria K Mor; Ming Geng; Michael J Fine; Bertrand Renaud; Said A Ibrahim
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  The Swiss cohort of elderly patients with venous thromboembolism (SWITCO65+): rationale and methodology.

Authors:  Marie Méan; Marc Righini; Kurt Jaeger; Hans-Jürg Beer; Beat Frauchiger; Joseph Osterwalder; Nils Kucher; Bernhard Lämmle; Jacques Cornuz; Anne Angelillo-Scherrer; Nicolas Rodondi; Andreas Limacher; Sven Trelle; Christian M Matter; Marc Husmann; Martin Banyai; Markus Aschwanden; Michael Egloff; Lucia Mazzolai; Olivier Hugli; Henri Bounameaux; Drahomir Aujesky
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 10.  When to perform CTA in patients suspected of PE?

Authors:  Benoît Ghaye; Robert F Dondelinger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.