Literature DB >> 21540360

Repair of focal cartilage defects with scaffold-assisted autologous chondrocyte grafts: clinical and biomechanical results 48 months after transplantation.

Peter C Kreuz1, Sebastian Müller, Undine Freymann, Christoph Erggelet, Philipp Niemeyer, Christian Kaps, Anja Hirschmüller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Scaffold-assisted autologous chondrocyte implantation is a clinically effective procedure for cartilage repair, but biomechanical evaluations are still missing.
PURPOSE: This study was conducted to assess the clinical efficacy, including biomechanical analyses, of BioSeed-C treatment for traumatic and degenerative cartilage defects of the knee. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: The authors evaluated the midterm clinical and biomechanical outcome of BioSeed-C, a cell-based fibrin-polymer graft for the treatment of cartilage defects. Clinical outcome at 4-year follow-up was assessed in 52 patients with full-thickness cartilage defects, International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) stage III and IV. Clinical scoring was performed preoperatively and 48 months after implantation using the Lysholm score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, the ICRS score, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and the Noyes score. Cartilage regeneration was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using the Henderson-Kreuz score. Biomechanical evaluation was performed by isokinetic strength measurements, comparing healthy and operated knee of each patient.
RESULTS: Clinical evaluation showed significant improvement in the Lysholm (from 51.8 preoperatively to 80.7 at 48 months postoperatively), IKDC (from 47.5 to 71.5), ICRS (from 3.8 to 2.0), KOOS (subcategory pain from 62 to 78, symptoms from 68 to 76, activities of daily living from 68 to 85, sports from 19 to 55, and quality of life from 30 to 55), and Noyes (from 31 to 59) scores (P ≤ .001) 48 months after implantation of BioSeed-C compared with the preoperative situation. The MRI evaluations showed moderate to complete defect filling in 43 of 44 treated patients. Two patients without improvement in the clinical and MRI scores received a total knee endoprosthesis after 4 years. Isokinetic evaluation showed significantly reduced maximum strength capacities for knee flexion and extension at the operated knee compared with the healthy knee (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: The clinical outcomes 4 years after graft implantation are good despite a persisting strength deficit. Implanting BioSeed-C is a promising treatment option for cartilage defects of the knee. More emphasis should be put on the rehabilitation of muscular strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21540360     DOI: 10.1177/0363546511403279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  27 in total

Review 1.  Application of cell and biomaterial-based tissue engineering methods in the treatment of cartilage, menisci and ligament injuries.

Authors:  Tomasz Trzeciak; Magdalena Richter; Wiktoria Suchorska; Ewelina Augustyniak; Michał Lach; Małgorzata Kaczmarek; Jacek Kaczmarczyk
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  The current state of scaffolds for musculoskeletal regenerative applications.

Authors:  Benjamin D Smith; Daniel A Grande
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 20.543

3.  [Reconstruction of osteochondral defects with a collagen I hydrogel. Results of a prospective multicenter study].

Authors:  L Rackwitz; U Schneider; S Andereya; S Siebenlist; J C Reichert; F Fensky; J Arnholdt; J Arnhold; I Löer; R Grossstück; W Zinser; T Barthel; M Rudert; U Nöth
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Long-Term Clinical and MRI Results of Matrix-Assisted Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation for Articular Cartilage Defects of the Knee.

Authors:  Peter Cornelius Kreuz; Richard Horst Kalkreuth; Philipp Niemeyer; Markus Uhl; Christoph Erggelet
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-02-11       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 5.  Biomechanical outcomes of cartilage repair of the knee.

Authors:  Carmen E Quatman; Joshua D Harris; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 6.  Cell-based tissue engineering strategies used in the clinical repair of articular cartilage.

Authors:  Brian J Huang; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 7.  Poly (lactic acid)-based biomaterials for orthopaedic regenerative engineering.

Authors:  Ganesh Narayanan; Varadraj N Vernekar; Emmanuel L Kuyinu; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 15.470

8.  [The bovine cartilage punch model: a tool for the in vitro analysis of biomaterials and cartilage regeneration].

Authors:  A Dunzel; T Rüdiger; D Pretzel; V Kopsch; M Endres; C Kaps; P Föhr; R H Burgkart; S Linß; R W Kinne
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Cartilage Defect Treatment Using High-Density Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation: Two-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Juan Manuel Lopez-Alcorocho; Lucia Aboli; Isabel Guillen-Vicente; Elena Rodriguez-Iñigo; Marta Guillen-Vicente; Tomás F Fernández-Jaén; Santiago Arauz; Steve Abelow; Pedro Guillen-García
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Cartilage repair in the knee with subchondral drilling augmented with a platelet-rich plasma-immersed polymer-based implant.

Authors:  Alberto Siclari; Gennaro Mascaro; Chiara Gentili; Christian Kaps; Ranieri Cancedda; Eugenio Boux
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.