Literature DB >> 21538786

Early- and mid-term outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with logistic EuroSCORE less than 20%: a comparative analysis between different risk strata.

Corrado Tamburino1, Marco Barbanti, Davide Capodanno, Kunal Sarkar, Valeria Cammalleri, Marilena Scarabelli, Massimiliano Mulè, Sebastiano Immè, Patrizia Aruta, Gian Paolo Ussia.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an emerging alternative to medical therapy reserved to a limited population with severe aortic stenosis. The European consensus document recommended TAVI for prohibitive-risk patients not eligible for conventional surgery (prohibitive risk defined as expected mortality ≥ 20% calculated with the Logistic EuroScore (LES) in association with clinical judgment). To date, there is lack of clarity on data about outcomes of TAVI in lower risk patients. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing TAVI with LES ≥ 20% in comparison with patients with LES < 20%.
METHOD: Of 165 patients who underwent TAVI using the 18-French Medtronic CoreValve (N = 153) and the Sapien Edwards™ (N = 12) at our Institution between June 2007 and September 2010, we identified those with LES < 20%, with prosthesis implantation (n = 84), and reported on their clinical outcome compared with patients with LES ≥ 20% (n = 78). The primary endpoint was the incidence of overall death and major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac events (MACCE) at 30-day and midterm follow-up stratifying patients by clinical characteristics.
RESULTS: At 30-day, a significant higher incidence of MACCE (20.8% vs. 6.0%, odds ratio [OR] 4.08 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-11.74, P = 0.009) and death (15.6% vs. 2.4%, OR 7.45 95% CI 1.61-34.48, P = 0.010) was reported in the LES ≥ 20% group as compared with the LES < 20% group, respectively. The 12-month MACCE rates was (27.1% vs. 11.4%, hazard ratio [HR] 2.47 95% CI 0.93-6.63, P = 0. 071) for LES ≥ 20% and LES < 20% patients, respectively (mortality rates was 25.7% vs. 6.8% HR 4.21 95% CI 1.24-14.30, P = 0.021).
CONCLUSION: This study tends to suggest that current mortality reported after TAVI could be significantly affected by the very-high risk profile of the population which currently undergoes this procedure, making comparison with surgical series rather unreliable.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21538786     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.23100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  10 in total

1.  3-year outcomes of self-expanding Corevalve prosthesis - The Italian Registry.

Authors:  Marco Barbanti; Gian Paolo Ussia; Stefano Cannata; Alessandra Giarratana; Carmelo Sgroi; Corrado Tamburino
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

2.  Aortic valve replacement vs. transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Patient selection.

Authors:  Jian Ye; Jia Lin Soon; John Webb
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

3.  Transcatheter resection of the native aortic valve prior to endovalve implantation - A rational approach to reduce TAVI-induced complications.

Authors:  Parla Astarci; Pierre-Yves Etienne; Benoit Raucent; Xavier Bollen; Kahn Tranduy; David Glineur; Laurent Dekerchove; Philippe Noirhomme; Gébrine Elkhoury
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

Review 4.  Clinical studies assessing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Shaheena Raheem; Jeffrey J Popma
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun

Review 5.  TAVI 2012: state of the art.

Authors:  Jochen Reinöhl; Constantin von Zur Mühlen; Martin Moser; Stefan Sorg; Christoph Bode; Manfred Zehender
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Comparison of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis: a longitudinal study of echocardiography parameters in cohort A of the PARTNER trial (placement of aortic transcatheter valves).

Authors:  Rebecca T Hahn; Philippe Pibarot; William J Stewart; Neil J Weissman; Deepika Gopalakrishnan; Martin G Keane; Saif Anwaruddin; Zuyue Wang; Martin Bilsker; Brian R Lindman; Howard C Herrmann; Susheel K Kodali; Raj Makkar; Vinod H Thourani; Lars G Svensson; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Martin B Leon; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Tissue-engineered heart valve with a tubular leaflet design for minimally invasive transcatheter implantation.

Authors:  Ricardo Moreira; Thaddaeus Velz; Nuno Alves; Valentine N Gesche; Axel Malischewski; Thomas Schmitz-Rode; Julia Frese; Stefan Jockenhoevel; Petra Mela
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 8.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current and future approaches.

Authors:  Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 9.  New conduction abnormalities after TAVI--frequency and causes.

Authors:  Robert M van der Boon; Rutger-Jan Nuis; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Luc Jordaens; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Ron T van Domburg; Patrick W Serruys; Robert H Anderson; Peter P T de Jaegere
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  A review of most relevant complications of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Siyamek Neragi-Miandoab; Robert E Michler
Journal:  ISRN Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.