With signal-to-noise ratio enhancements on the order of 10,000-fold, hyperpolarized MRSI of metabolically active substrates allows the study of both the injected substrate and downstream metabolic products in vivo. Although hyperpolarized [1-(13)C]pyruvate, in particular, has been used to demonstrate metabolic activities in various animal models, robust quantification and metabolic modeling remain important areas of investigation. Enzyme saturation effects are routinely seen with commonly used doses of hyperpolarized [1-(13)C]pyruvate; however, most metrics proposed to date, including metabolite ratios, time-to-peak of metabolic products and single exchange rate constants, fail to capture these saturation effects. In addition, the widely used small-flip-angle excitation approach does not correctly model the inflow of fresh downstream metabolites generated proximal to the target slice, which is often a significant factor in vivo. In this work, we developed an efficient quantification framework employing a spiral-based dynamic spectroscopic imaging approach. The approach overcomes the aforementioned limitations and demonstrates that the in vivo (13)C labeling of lactate and alanine after a bolus injection of [1-(13)C]pyruvate is well approximated by saturatable kinetics, which can be mathematically modeled using a Michaelis-Menten-like formulation, with the resulting estimated apparent maximal reaction velocity V(max) and apparent Michaelis constant K(M) being unbiased with respect to critical experimental parameters, including the substrate dose, bolus shape and duration. Although the proposed saturatable model has a similar mathematical formulation to the original Michaelis-Menten kinetics, it is conceptually different. In this study, we focus on the (13)C labeling of lactate and alanine and do not differentiate the labeling mechanism (net flux or isotopic exchange) or the respective contribution of various factors (organ perfusion rate, substrate transport kinetics, enzyme activities and the size of the unlabeled lactate and alanine pools) to the labeling process.
With signal-to-noise Species">ratio enhancements on the order of 10,000-fold, hyperpolarized span>n class="Disease">MRSI of metabolically active substrates allows the study of both the injected substrate and downstream metabolic products in vivo. Although hyperpolarized [1-(13)C]pyruvate, in particular, has been used to demonstrate metabolic activities in various animal models, robust quantification and metabolic modeling remain important areas of investigation. Enzyme saturation effects are routinely seen with commonly used doses of hyperpolarized [1-(13)C]pyruvate; however, most metrics proposed to date, including metabolite ratios, time-to-peak of metabolic products and single exchange rate constants, fail to capture these saturation effects. In addition, the widely used small-flip-angle excitation approach does not correctly model the inflow of fresh downstream metabolites generated proximal to the target slice, which is often a significant factor in vivo. In this work, we developed an efficient quantification framework employing a spiral-based dynamic spectroscopic imaging approach. The approach overcomes the aforementioned limitations and demonstrates that the in vivo (13)C labeling of lactate and alanine after a bolus injection of [1-(13)C]pyruvate is well approximated by saturatable kinetics, which can be mathematically modeled using a Michaelis-Menten-like formulation, with the resulting estimated apparent maximal reaction velocity V(max) and apparent Michaelis constant K(M) being unbiased with respect to critical experimental parameters, including the substrate dose, bolus shape and duration. Although the proposed saturatable model has a similar mathematical formulation to the original Michaelis-Menten kinetics, it is conceptually different. In this study, we focus on the (13)C labeling of lactate and alanine and do not differentiate the labeling mechanism (net flux or isotopic exchange) or the respective contribution of various factors (organ perfusion rate, substrate transport kinetics, enzyme activities and the size of the unlabeled lactate and alanine pools) to the labeling process.
Authors: Matthew L Zierhut; Yi-Fen Yen; Albert P Chen; Robert Bok; Mark J Albers; Vickie Zhang; Jim Tropp; Ilwoo Park; Daniel B Vigneron; John Kurhanewicz; Ralph E Hurd; Sarah J Nelson Journal: J Magn Reson Date: 2009-10-13 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Klaes Golman; René In't Zandt; Mathilde Lerche; Rikard Pehrson; Jan Henrik Ardenkjaer-Larsen Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-11-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Sam E Day; Mikko I Kettunen; Ferdia A Gallagher; De-En Hu; Mathilde Lerche; Jan Wolber; Klaes Golman; Jan Henrik Ardenkjaer-Larsen; Kevin M Brindle Journal: Nat Med Date: 2007-10-28 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Charles H Cunningham; Albert P Chen; Mark J Albers; John Kurhanewicz; Ralph E Hurd; Yi-Fen Yen; John M Pauly; Sarah J Nelson; Daniel B Vigneron Journal: J Magn Reson Date: 2007-06-02 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Mark J Albers; Robert Bok; Albert P Chen; Charles H Cunningham; Matt L Zierhut; Vickie Yi Zhang; Susan J Kohler; James Tropp; Ralph E Hurd; Yi-Fen Yen; Sarah J Nelson; Daniel B Vigneron; John Kurhanewicz Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Marie A Schroeder; Helen J Atherton; Lowri E Cochlin; Kieran Clarke; George K Radda; Damian J Tyler Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: S J Kohler; Y Yen; J Wolber; A P Chen; M J Albers; R Bok; V Zhang; J Tropp; S Nelson; D B Vigneron; J Kurhanewicz; R E Hurd Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Jae Mo Park; Chalermchai Khemtong; Shie-Chau Liu; Ralph E Hurd; Daniel M Spielman Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-03-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Sonal Josan; Kelvin Billingsley; Juan Orduna; Jae Mo Park; Richard Luong; Liqing Yu; Ralph Hurd; Adolf Pfefferbaum; Daniel Spielman; Dirk Mayer Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2015-10-16 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: David J Niles; Jeremy W Gordon; Gengwen Huang; Shannon Reese; Erin B Adamson; Arjang Djamali; Sean B Fain Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2017-11-12 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Ralph E Hurd; Daniel Spielman; Sonal Josan; Yi-Fen Yen; Adolf Pfefferbaum; Dirk Mayer Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-11-19 Impact factor: 4.668