PURPOSE: To investigate metabolic exchange between (13)C(1)-pyruvate, (13)C(1)-lactate, and (13)C(1)-alanine in pre-clinical model systems using kinetic modeling of dynamic hyperpolarized (13)C spectroscopic data and to examine the relationship between fitted parameters and dose-response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dynamic (13)C spectroscopy data were acquired in normal rats, wild type mice, and mice with transgenic prostate tumors (TRAMP) either within a single slice or using a one-dimensional echo-planar spectroscopic imaging (1D-EPSI) encoding technique. Rate constants were estimated by fitting a set of exponential equations to the dynamic data. Variations in fitted parameters were used to determine model robustness in 15 mm slices centered on normal rat kidneys. Parameter values were used to investigate differences in metabolism between and within TRAMP and wild type mice. RESULTS: The kinetic model was shown here to be robust when fitting data from a rat given similar doses. In normal rats, Michaelis-Menten kinetics were able to describe the dose-response of the fitted exchange rate constants with a 13.65% and 16.75% scaled fitting error (SFE) for k(pyr-->lac) and k(pyr-->ala), respectively. In TRAMP mice, k(pyr-->lac) increased an average of 94% after up to 23 days of disease progression, whether the mice were untreated or treated with casodex. Parameters estimated from dynamic (13)C 1D-EPSI data were able to differentiate anatomical structures within both wild type and TRAMP mice. CONCLUSIONS: The metabolic parameters estimated using this approach may be useful for in vivo monitoring of tumor progression and treatment efficacy, as well as to distinguish between various tissues based on metabolic activity. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PURPOSE: To investigate metabolic exchange between (13)C(1)-pyruvate, (13)C(1)-lactate, and (13)C(1)-alanine in pre-clinical model systems using kinetic modeling of dynamic hyperpolarized (13)C spectroscopic data and to examine the relationship between fitted parameters and dose-response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dynamic (13)C spectroscopy data were acquired in normal rats, wild type mice, and mice with transgenic prostate tumors (TRAMP) either within a single slice or using a one-dimensional echo-planar spectroscopic imaging (1D-EPSI) encoding technique. Rate constants were estimated by fitting a set of exponential equations to the dynamic data. Variations in fitted parameters were used to determine model robustness in 15 mm slices centered on normal rat kidneys. Parameter values were used to investigate differences in metabolism between and within TRAMP and wild type mice. RESULTS: The kinetic model was shown here to be robust when fitting data from a rat given similar doses. In normal rats, Michaelis-Menten kinetics were able to describe the dose-response of the fitted exchange rate constants with a 13.65% and 16.75% scaled fitting error (SFE) for k(pyr-->lac) and k(pyr-->ala), respectively. In TRAMPmice, k(pyr-->lac) increased an average of 94% after up to 23 days of disease progression, whether the mice were untreated or treated with casodex. Parameters estimated from dynamic (13)C1D-EPSI data were able to differentiate anatomical structures within both wild type and TRAMPmice. CONCLUSIONS: The metabolic parameters estimated using this approach may be useful for in vivo monitoring of tumor progression and treatment efficacy, as well as to distinguish between various tissues based on metabolic activity. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Klaes Golman; René In't Zandt; Mathilde Lerche; Rikard Pehrson; Jan Henrik Ardenkjaer-Larsen Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-11-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Sam E Day; Mikko I Kettunen; Ferdia A Gallagher; De-En Hu; Mathilde Lerche; Jan Wolber; Klaes Golman; Jan Henrik Ardenkjaer-Larsen; Kevin M Brindle Journal: Nat Med Date: 2007-10-28 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Charles H Cunningham; Albert P Chen; Mark J Albers; John Kurhanewicz; Ralph E Hurd; Yi-Fen Yen; John M Pauly; Sarah J Nelson; Daniel B Vigneron Journal: J Magn Reson Date: 2007-06-02 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: J R Gingrich; R J Barrios; R A Morton; B F Boyce; F J DeMayo; M J Finegold; R Angelopoulou; J M Rosen; N M Greenberg Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1996-09-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: S J Kohler; Y Yen; J Wolber; A P Chen; M J Albers; R Bok; V Zhang; J Tropp; S Nelson; D B Vigneron; J Kurhanewicz; R E Hurd Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Galen D Reed; Peder E Z Larson; Cornelius von Morze; Robert Bok; Michael Lustig; Adam B Kerr; John M Pauly; John Kurhanewicz; Daniel B Vigneron Journal: J Magn Reson Date: 2012-02-24 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: John Kurhanewicz; Daniel B Vigneron; Kevin Brindle; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Arnaud Comment; Charles H Cunningham; Ralph J Deberardinis; Gary G Green; Martin O Leach; Sunder S Rajan; Rahim R Rizi; Brian D Ross; Warren S Warren; Craig R Malloy Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Eugene Milshteyn; Cornelius von Morze; Galen D Reed; Hong Shang; Peter J Shin; Zihan Zhu; Hsin-Yu Chen; Robert Bok; Andrei Goga; John Kurhanewicz; Peder E Z Larson; Daniel B Vigneron Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-01-07 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Eugen Kubala; Kim A Muñoz-Álvarez; Geoffrey Topping; Christian Hundshammer; Benedikt Feuerecker; Pedro A Gómez; Giorgio Pariani; Franz Schilling; Steffen J Glaser; Rolf F Schulte; Marion I Menzel; Markus Schwaiger Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2016-12-30 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Alexander Kirpich; Mukundan Ragavan; James A Bankson; Lauren M McIntyre; Matthew E Merritt Journal: J Chem Inf Model Date: 2019-01-15 Impact factor: 4.956