Literature DB >> 21538136

Population genetics of the cytoplasm and the units of selection on mitochondrial DNA in Drosophila melanogaster.

David M Rand1.   

Abstract

Biological variation exists across a nested set of hierarchical levels from nucleotides within genes to populations within species to lineages within the tree of life. How selection acts across this hierarchy is a long-standing question in evolutionary biology. Recent studies have suggested that genome size is influenced largely by the balance of selection, mutation and drift in lineages with different population sizes. Here we use population cage and maternal transmission experiments to identify the relative strength of selection at an individual and cytoplasmic level. No significant trends were observed in the frequency of large (L) and small (S) mtDNAs across 14 generations in population cages. In all replicate cages, new length variants were observed in heteroplasmic states indicating that spontaneous length mutations occurred in these experimental populations. Heteroplasmic flies carrying L genomes were more frequent than those carrying S genomes suggesting an asymmetric mutation dynamic from larger to smaller mtDNAs. Mother-offspring transmission of heteroplasmy showed that the L mtDNA increased in frequency within flies both between and within generations despite sampling drift of the same intensity as occurred in population cages. These results suggest that selection for mtDNA size is stronger at the cytoplasmic than at the organismal level. The fixation of novel mtDNAs within and between species requires a transient intracellular heteroplasmic stage. The balance of population genetic forces at the cytoplasmic and individual levels governs the units of selection on mtDNA, and has implications for evolutionary inference as well as for the effects of mtDNA mutations on fitness, disease and aging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21538136      PMCID: PMC3149803          DOI: 10.1007/s10709-011-9576-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  53 in total

1.  Sexually antagonistic cytonuclear fitness interactions in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D M Rand; A G Clark; L M Kann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Population size does not influence mitochondrial genetic diversity in animals.

Authors:  Eric Bazin; Sylvain Glémin; Nicolas Galtier
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Determination of mitochondrial genetic diversity in mammals.

Authors:  Benoit Nabholz; Jean-François Mauffrey; Eric Bazin; Nicolas Galtier; Sylvain Glemin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The mitochondrial DNA genetic bottleneck results from replication of a subpopulation of genomes.

Authors:  Timothy Wai; Daniella Teoli; Eric A Shoubridge
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Mitochondrial heteroplasmy and the evolution of insecticide resistance: non-Mendelian inheritance in action.

Authors:  Thomas Van Leeuwen; Bartel Vanholme; Steven Van Pottelberge; Pieter Van Nieuwenhuyse; Ralf Nauen; Luc Tirry; Ian Denholm
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Evidence for non-neutrality of mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  A F MacRae; W W Anderson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Selection in chemostats.

Authors:  D E Dykhuizen; D L Hartl
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1983-06

Review 8.  A mitochondrial paradigm of metabolic and degenerative diseases, aging, and cancer: a dawn for evolutionary medicine.

Authors:  Douglas C Wallace
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 16.830

9.  Mitochondrial DNA evolution in the melanogaster species subgroup of Drosophila.

Authors:  M Solignac; M Monnerot; J C Mounolou
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 10.  Why do we still have a maternally inherited mitochondrial DNA? Insights from evolutionary medicine.

Authors:  Douglas C Wallace
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 23.643

View more
  16 in total

1.  Mitochondrial Mutation Rate, Spectrum and Heteroplasmy in Caenorhabditis elegans Spontaneous Mutation Accumulation Lines of Differing Population Size.

Authors:  Anke Konrad; Owen Thompson; Robert H Waterston; Donald G Moerman; Peter D Keightley; Ulfar Bergthorsson; Vaishali Katju
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 2.  Mitochondrial maintenance failure in aging and role of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  John Tower
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 4.013

Review 3.  Selfish Mitonuclear Conflict.

Authors:  Justin C Havird; Evan S Forsythe; Alissa M Williams; John H Werren; Damian K Dowling; Daniel B Sloan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  More accurate phylogenies inferred from low-recombination regions in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting.

Authors:  James B Pease; Matthew W Hahn
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Incorporating antagonistic pleiotropy into models for molecular replicators.

Authors:  Tianjiao Qu; Peter Calabrese; Pratik Singhavi; John Tower
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  2020-12-25       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Similar Efficacies of Selection Shape Mitochondrial and Nuclear Genes in Both Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens.

Authors:  Brandon S Cooper; Chad R Burrus; Chao Ji; Matthew W Hahn; Kristi L Montooth
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 7.  Keeping mtDNA in shape between generations.

Authors:  James B Stewart; Nils-Göran Larsson
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Origins and functional consequences of somatic mitochondrial DNA mutations in human cancer.

Authors:  Young Seok Ju; Ludmil B Alexandrov; Moritz Gerstung; Inigo Martincorena; Serena Nik-Zainal; Manasa Ramakrishna; Helen R Davies; Elli Papaemmanuil; Gunes Gundem; Adam Shlien; Niccolo Bolli; Sam Behjati; Patrick S Tarpey; Jyoti Nangalia; Charles E Massie; Adam P Butler; Jon W Teague; George S Vassiliou; Anthony R Green; Ming-Qing Du; Ashwin Unnikrishnan; John E Pimanda; Bin Tean Teh; Nikhil Munshi; Mel Greaves; Paresh Vyas; Adel K El-Naggar; Tom Santarius; V Peter Collins; Richard Grundy; Jack A Taylor; D Neil Hayes; David Malkin; Christopher S Foster; Anne Y Warren; Hayley C Whitaker; Daniel Brewer; Rosalind Eeles; Colin Cooper; David Neal; Tapio Visakorpi; William B Isaacs; G Steven Bova; Adrienne M Flanagan; P Andrew Futreal; Andy G Lynch; Patrick F Chinnery; Ultan McDermott; Michael R Stratton; Peter J Campbell
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Selections that isolate recombinant mitochondrial genomes in animals.

Authors:  Hansong Ma; Patrick H O'Farrell
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Different degree of paternal mtDNA leakage between male and female progeny in interspecific Drosophila crosses.

Authors:  Emmanouil Dokianakis; Emmanuel D Ladoukakis
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.