Literature DB >> 21537945

Additional value of FDG PET/CT to contrast-enhanced CT in the differentiation between benign and malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas with mural nodules.

Kentaro Takanami1, Tomomichi Hiraide, Masashi Tsuda, Yasuhiro Nakamura, Tomohiro Kaneta, Kei Takase, Hiroshi Fukuda, Shoki Takahashi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed at determining the additional value of FDG PET/CT to contrast-enhanced CT in the differentiation between benign and malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas with mural nodules.
METHODS: This retrospective review of medical records was approved by our institutional review board. The preoperative PET/CT images of 16 non-diabetic patients with surgically proven IPMN, where mural nodules of 3 mm or larger were shown by preoperative contrast-enhanced CT, were retrospectively evaluated. The 16 patients were divided into two groups: 7 patients with benign IPMN [adenoma (n = 1) and borderline tumor (n = 6)] and 9 patients with malignant IPMN [carcinoma in situ (CIS) (n = 8) and invasive carcinoma (n = 1)]. Nuclear medicine physician blinded to the pathologic assessment of malignancy of IPMN set a spherical volume of interest (VOI) over the mural nodules on PET/CT images and recorded the peak standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) in the VOI, referring the contrast-enhanced CT images. Statistical differences in the size of mural nodule, the diameter of main pancreatic duct (MPD), and SUV(max) of the tumors between benign IPMNs and malignant IPMNs were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Additionally, the diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET for the detection of malignancy was calculated.
RESULTS: The SUV(max) of the malignant IPMNs with mural nodules of 3 mm or larger was higher than that of benign IPMNs (2.7 ± 0.6 vs. 1.9 ± 0.3, p < 0.01). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in mural nodule diameter and MPD diameter between the two groups. FDG PET/CT showed an excellent diagnostic accuracy for the differentiation between malignant and benign IPMNs with mural nodules: the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy in malignant IPMN with mural nodule of FDG PET/CT were 77.8, 100, 100, 77.8, and 87.5 for the cutoff value of 2.3; and 100, 57.1, 75.0, 100, and 81.3 for the cutoff value of 2.0, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The result of this study indicates that FDG PET/CT can provide additional information for the differentiation between benign and malignant IPMNs of the pancreas with mural nodules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21537945     DOI: 10.1007/s12149-011-0494-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Nucl Med        ISSN: 0914-7187            Impact factor:   2.668


  14 in total

1.  FDG-PET in diagnosis, staging and prognosis of pancreatic carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhen Wang; Jun-Qiang Chen; Jin-Lu Liu; Xin-Gan Qin; Yuan Huang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Increased risk of second malignancy in pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous tumors: Review of the literature.

Authors:  Gian Luca Baiocchi; Sarah Molfino; Barbara Frittoli; Graziella Pigozzi; Federico Gheza; Giacomo Gaverini; Antonio Tarasconi; Chiara Ricci; Francesco Bertagna; Luigi Grazioli; Guido A M Tiberio; Nazario Portolani
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  State-of-the-art PET/CT of the pancreas: current role and emerging indications.

Authors:  Dushyant V Sahani; Pietro A Bonaffini; Onofrio A Catalano; Alexander R Guimaraes; Michael A Blake
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 4.  Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Lawrence Mj Best; Vishal Rawji; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-17

Review 5.  F18-FDG-PET/CT for evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN): a review of the literature.

Authors:  Francesco Bertagna; Giorgio Treglia; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Raffaele Giubbini
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  Value of apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting malignancy of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Sheng Xiang Rao; Xue Feng Xu; Dan Song Wang; Da Yong Jin; Meng Su Zeng
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 7.  Ductal Dilatation of ≥5 mm in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm Should Trigger the Consideration for Pancreatectomy: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Resected Cases.

Authors:  Y H Andrew Wu; Atsushi Oba; Laurel Beaty; Kathryn L Colborn; Salvador Rodriguez Franco; Ben Harnke; Cheryl Meguid; Daniel Negrini; Roberto Valente; Steven Ahrendt; Richard D Schulick; Marco Del Chiaro
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  FDG-PET Findings of Intraductal Oncocytic Papillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas: Two Case Reports.

Authors:  Takashi Kato; Shuji Ikari; Kenji Hirata; Takuro Machida; Hideaki Nakamura; Takashi Meguro; Takayuki Morita; Toshiyuki Takahashi; Nagara Tamaki; Shoichi Horita
Journal:  Case Rep Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-26

Review 9.  Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm of Pancreas.

Authors:  Norman Oneil Machado; Hani Al Qadhi; Khalifa Al Wahibi
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2015-05

Review 10.  Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: an update.

Authors:  Shu-Yuan Xiao
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2012-11-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.