Literature DB >> 21537035

Reducing time to diagnosis does not improve outcomes for women with symptomatic ovarian cancer: a report from the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group.

Christina M Nagle1, Jane E Francis, Anne E Nelson, Helen Zorbas, Karen Luxford, Anna de Fazio, Sian Fereday, David D Bowtell, Adèle C Green, Penelope M Webb.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if time to diagnosis is associated with stage of disease at diagnosis or survival among women with symptomatic ovarian cancer.
METHODS: A representative sample of Australian women (n = 1,463) with ovarian cancer diagnosed between 2002 and 2005 who participated in a population-based case-control study were interviewed regarding the events leading to their diagnosis and were observed for mortality for 5 years.
RESULTS: Of the 1,318 women (90%) who presented to a medical practitioner with symptoms, 55% presented within 1 month, 70% in less than 2 months, and 92% within 6 months of symptom onset. There were no significant differences in the time from symptom onset to first medical practitioner consultation (P = .19) or symptom onset to diagnosis (P = .64) among women with borderline, early (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] stages I to II) or late (FIGO stages III to IV) disease. There was also no association between time to diagnosis and survival; adjusted hazard ratio for long delay (> 12 months from symptom onset to diagnosis) versus short delay (≤ 1 month) was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.68 to 1.30). Women who had asymptomatic cancers diagnosed incidentally (n = 145) were younger and were more likely to have borderline or stage I disease compared with women who had symptomatic ovarian cancer.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that, once ovarian cancer is symptomatic, reducing the time to diagnosis would not greatly alter stage of disease at diagnosis or survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21537035     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.2164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  14 in total

1.  Diagnostic and referral intervals for Manitoba women with epithelial ovarian cancer - the Manitoba Ovarian Cancer Outcomes (MOCO) study group: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Allison J Love; Pascal Lambert; Donna Turner; Robert Lotocki; Erin Dean; Shaundra Popowich; Alon D Altman; Mark W Nachtigal
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-02-07

Review 2.  Ovarian cancer in 2011: Mutations and non-inferiority analyses show a way forward.

Authors:  Maurie Markman
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Cancer diagnostic tools to aid decision-making in primary care: mixed-methods systematic reviews and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Antonieta Medina-Lara; Bogdan Grigore; Ruth Lewis; Jaime Peters; Sarah Price; Paolo Landa; Sophie Robinson; Richard Neal; William Hamilton; Anne E Spencer
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 4.  Cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: 2021 update.

Authors:  Jonathan S Berek; Malte Renz; Sean Kehoe; Lalit Kumar; Michael Friedlander
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 4.447

Review 5.  Is increased time to diagnosis and treatment in symptomatic cancer associated with poorer outcomes? Systematic review.

Authors:  R D Neal; P Tharmanathan; B France; N U Din; S Cotton; J Fallon-Ferguson; W Hamilton; A Hendry; M Hendry; R Lewis; U Macleod; E D Mitchell; M Pickett; T Rai; K Shaw; N Stuart; M L Tørring; C Wilkinson; B Williams; N Williams; J Emery
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Time to diagnosis of Type I or II invasive epithelial ovarian cancers: a multicentre observational study using patient questionnaire and primary care records.

Authors:  Aww Lim; D Mesher; A Gentry-Maharaj; N Balogun; M Widschwendter; I Jacobs; P Sasieni; U Menon
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  Ovarian cancer symptoms, routes to diagnosis and survival - Population cohort study in the 'no screen' arm of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS).

Authors:  James Dilley; Matthew Burnell; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Andy Ryan; Christina Neophytou; Sophia Apostolidou; Chloe Karpinskyj; Jatinderpal Kalsi; Tim Mould; Robert Woolas; Naveena Singh; Martin Widschwendter; Lesley Fallowfield; Stuart Campbell; Steven J Skates; Alistair McGuire; Mahesh Parmar; Ian Jacobs; Usha Menon
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Factors impacting the time to ovarian cancer diagnosis based on classic symptom presentation in the United States.

Authors:  Sarah P Huepenbecker; Charlotte C Sun; Shuangshuang Fu; Hui Zhao; Kristin Primm; Sharon H Giordano; Larissa A Meyer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Variation in the initial assessment and investigation for ovarian cancer in symptomatic women: a systematic review of international guidelines.

Authors:  Garth Funston; Marije Van Melle; Marie-Louise Ladegaard Baun; Henry Jensen; Charles Helsper; Jon Emery; Emma J Crosbie; Matthew Thompson; Willie Hamilton; Fiona M Walter
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  A multidisciplinary approach remains the best strategy to improve and strengthen the management of ovarian cancer (Review).

Authors:  Luca Falzone; Giuseppa Scandurra; Valentina Lombardo; Giuseppe Gattuso; Alessandro Lavoro; Andrea Benedetto Distefano; Giuseppe Scibilia; Paolo Scollo
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 5.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.