Sarah P Huepenbecker1, Charlotte C Sun1, Shuangshuang Fu2, Hui Zhao2, Kristin Primm3, Sharon H Giordano2, Larissa A Meyer1. 1. Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 2. Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 3. Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with ovarian cancer often present with late-stage disease and nonspecific symptoms, but little is known about factors affecting the time to diagnosis (TTD) in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective, population-based study of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database was conducted. It included women 66 years old or older with stage II to IV epithelial ovarian cancer with at least 1 code for abdominal/pelvic pain, bloating, difficulty eating, or urinary symptoms within 1 year of the cancer diagnosis. TTD was defined from the first claim with a prespecified symptom to the ovarian cancer diagnosis. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to assess for differences in TTD by group medians. Univariate and generalized linear models with a log-link function evaluated TTD by covariables. RESULTS: For the 13,872 women analyzed, the mean and median times to diagnosis were 2.9 and 1.1 months, respectively. The median TTD differed significantly by first symptom (P < .001), number of symptoms (P < .001), and first physician specialty seen (P < .001). In a multivariable analysis, TTD differed significantly according to race/ethnicity (P < .001), geographic region (P = .001), urban-rural location (P = .031), emergency room presentation (P < .001), and number of specialties seen (P < .001). A shorter TTD was associated with a diagnosis in 2006-2010 (relative risk [RR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.98) or 2011-2015 (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.81-0.93) in comparison with 1992-1999. CONCLUSIONS: The time from a symptomatic presentation to care to a diagnosis of ovarian cancer is influenced by clinical and demographic variables. This study's findings reinforce the importance of educating all physicians on ovarian cancer symptoms to aid in diagnosis. LAY SUMMARY: Ovarian cancer is often diagnosed once disease has spread because the classic symptoms of ovarian cancer-abdominal or pelvic pain, bloating, difficulty eating, and urinary issues-can be mistaken for other problems. This study examined the time between when women with classic ovarian cancer symptoms went to a physician and when they received a cancer diagnosis in a large database population. The authors found that the time to diagnosis differed according to the type and number of symptoms and what type of physician a woman saw as well as factors such as race, geographic location, and year of diagnosis.
BACKGROUND: Patients with ovarian cancer often present with late-stage disease and nonspecific symptoms, but little is known about factors affecting the time to diagnosis (TTD) in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective, population-based study of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database was conducted. It included women 66 years old or older with stage II to IV epithelial ovarian cancer with at least 1 code for abdominal/pelvic pain, bloating, difficulty eating, or urinary symptoms within 1 year of the cancer diagnosis. TTD was defined from the first claim with a prespecified symptom to the ovarian cancer diagnosis. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to assess for differences in TTD by group medians. Univariate and generalized linear models with a log-link function evaluated TTD by covariables. RESULTS: For the 13,872 women analyzed, the mean and median times to diagnosis were 2.9 and 1.1 months, respectively. The median TTD differed significantly by first symptom (P < .001), number of symptoms (P < .001), and first physician specialty seen (P < .001). In a multivariable analysis, TTD differed significantly according to race/ethnicity (P < .001), geographic region (P = .001), urban-rural location (P = .031), emergency room presentation (P < .001), and number of specialties seen (P < .001). A shorter TTD was associated with a diagnosis in 2006-2010 (relative risk [RR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.98) or 2011-2015 (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.81-0.93) in comparison with 1992-1999. CONCLUSIONS: The time from a symptomatic presentation to care to a diagnosis of ovarian cancer is influenced by clinical and demographic variables. This study's findings reinforce the importance of educating all physicians on ovarian cancer symptoms to aid in diagnosis. LAY SUMMARY: Ovarian cancer is often diagnosed once disease has spread because the classic symptoms of ovarian cancer-abdominal or pelvic pain, bloating, difficulty eating, and urinary issues-can be mistaken for other problems. This study examined the time between when women with classic ovarian cancer symptoms went to a physician and when they received a cancer diagnosis in a large database population. The authors found that the time to diagnosis differed according to the type and number of symptoms and what type of physician a woman saw as well as factors such as race, geographic location, and year of diagnosis.
Authors: Alon D Altman; Pascal Lambert; Allison J Love; Donna Turner; Robert Lotocki; Erin Dean; Shaundra Popowich; Mark W Nachtigal Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Barbara A Goff; Lynn S Mandel; Charles W Drescher; Nicole Urban; Shirley Gough; Kristi M Schurman; Joshua Patras; Barry S Mahony; M Robyn Andersen Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Daniel R Gomez; Kai-Ping Liao; Stephen G Swisher; George R Blumenschein; Jeremy J Erasmus; Thomas A Buchholz; Sharon H Giordano; Benjamin D Smith Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2015-05-23 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Elisa V Bandera; Valerie S Lee; Lorna Rodriguez-Rodriguez; C Bethan Powell; Lawrence H Kushi Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-08-12 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Adam B Weiner; Richard S Matulewicz; Jeffrey J Tosoian; Joseph M Feinglass; Edward M Schaeffer Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2017-11-15 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Galina Lurie; Pamela J Thompson; Katharine E McDuffie; Michael E Carney; Marc T Goodman Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2009-05-22 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: James Dilley; Matthew Burnell; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Andy Ryan; Christina Neophytou; Sophia Apostolidou; Chloe Karpinskyj; Jatinderpal Kalsi; Tim Mould; Robert Woolas; Naveena Singh; Martin Widschwendter; Lesley Fallowfield; Stuart Campbell; Steven J Skates; Alistair McGuire; Mahesh Parmar; Ian Jacobs; Usha Menon Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2020-06-17 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Sarah P Huepenbecker; Charlotte C Sun; Shuangshuang Fu; Hui Zhao; Weiguo He; Kristin Primm; Sharon H Giordano; Larissa A Meyer Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2022-07-04 Impact factor: 4.661