Literature DB >> 21534945

Molecular testing in congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21α-hydroxylase deficiency in the era of newborn screening.

K Sarafoglou1, C P Lorentz, N Otten, W S Oetting, S K G Grebe.   

Abstract

Newborn screening (NBS) identifies the majority of classical [salt-wasting (SW) and simple-virilizing (SV)] cases of congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) due to 21α-hydroxylase (21α-OHase) during the first days of life. Diagnosis of classical CAH is confirmed by follow-up serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone and/or the adrenocorticotropin stimulation test; however, neither test definitively distinguishes between the classical subtypes. After confirmation, all newborns are started on hydrocortisone (glucocorticoid) and fludrocortisone (mineralocorticoid) treatment. While initiating fludrocortisone treatment in classical CAH patients, independent of subtype and before SW signs or symptoms occur, prevents a life-threatening SW crisis, it may later complicate distinguishing between the classical subtypes. Genotype-phenotype correlations in 21α-OHase deficiency are excellent; however, molecular testing is not a regular part of the diagnostic workup. Molecular testing on 39 patients (25 identified by NBS) with an already established diagnosis of CAH identified 11 SW patients (8 identified by NBS) whose mutations suggested further biochemical and clinical reassessment of their subtype. Overall, SW accounted for 57.6% of our classical CAH patients, below the generally accepted figure that >75% of classical CAH are comprised of the SW form. In the era of NBS, molecular testing is a valuable supplemental tool identifying patients who may benefit from reassessment of their salt-retaining ability.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21534945     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01694.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  5 in total

Review 1.  Disorders of sex development: effect of molecular diagnostics.

Authors:  John C Achermann; Sorahia Domenice; Tania A S S Bachega; Mirian Y Nishi; Berenice B Mendonca
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 2.  Management of congenital adrenal hyperplasia in childhood.

Authors:  Mimi S Kim; Anna Ryabets-Lienhard; Mitchell E Geffner
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.243

3.  Clinical Patterns and Linear Growth in Children with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia, an 11-Year Experience.

Authors:  Adnan Al Shaikh; Yasser AlGhanmi; Saniah Awidah; Abdullah Bahha; Mohamed E Ahmed; Ashraf T Soliman
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019 May-Jun

4.  Late clinical presentation of congenital adrenal hyperplasia in older children: findings from national paediatric surveillance.

Authors:  Rachel L Knowles; Javaria M Khalid; Juliet M Oerton; Peter C Hindmarsh; Christopher J Kelnar; Carol Dezateux
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Evaluation of a Two-Tier Screening Pathway for Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia in the New South Wales Newborn Screening Programme.

Authors:  Fei Lai; Shubha Srinivasan; Veronica Wiley
Journal:  Int J Neonatal Screen       Date:  2020-08-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.