Literature DB >> 21534898

National trends in the uptake of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer, 2000-2008.

Bridie S Thompson1, Michael D Coory, John W Lumley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the trends in the uptake of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Retrospective analysis of Australia-wide data on elective resections for colorectal cancer over the 8 financial years 2000-01 to 2007-08, obtained from the National Hospital Morbidity Database. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: National trends in annual percentage of colorectal resections for cancer that were conducted laparoscopically for each year, stratified by hospitals conducting a high volume of elective resections (40 or more/year) versus a low volume, and by public versus private hospitals.
RESULTS: For all Australian hospitals combined, the percentage of resections for colon cancer conducted laparoscopically increased from 2.4% in 2000-01 to 27.5% in 2007-08. For rectal cancer, this increase was from 1.1% to 21.5%. The largest increases were seen in high-volume private hospitals (colon cancer, 2.7% to 34.1%; rectal cancer, 1.5% to 26.2%), but increases also occurred in high-volume public hospitals (colon cancer, 2.7% to 32.2%; rectal cancer, 0.5% to 20.3%), low-volume private (colon cancer, 3.8% to 27.1%; rectal cancer, 2.4% to 25.5%) and low-volume public (colon cancer, 1.1% to 17.0%; rectal cancer, 0.5% to 13.8%) hospitals.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer has increased throughout Australian hospitals. Our findings provide the data necessary to ensure adequate resource allocation by the appropriate medical bodies to achieve optimal success in the uptake of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer in Australia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21534898     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb03056.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  10 in total

1.  Do Diagnostic and Procedure Codes Within Population-Based, Administrative Datasets Accurately Identify Patients with Rectal Cancer?

Authors:  Reilly P Musselman; Tara Gomes; Deanna M Rothwell; Rebecca C Auer; Husein Moloo; Robin P Boushey; Carl van Walraven
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Isolated rectal cancer surgery: a 2007-2014 population study based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Mario Saia; Alessandra Buja; Domenico Mantoan; Gino Sartor; Ferdinando Agresta; Vincenzo Baldo
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-04-13

3.  Cost savings for elective laparoscopic resection compared with open resection for colorectal cancer in a region of high uptake.

Authors:  Bridie S Thompson; Michael D Coory; Louisa G Gordon; John W Lumley
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Atraumatic O-ring wound retractor reduces postoperative pain.

Authors:  V Lohsiriwat; D Lohsiriwat
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Reduced perioperative death following laparoscopic colorectal resection: results of an international observational study.

Authors:  A Munasinghe; B Singh; N Mahmoud; M Joy; D C Chang; F Penninckx; O Faiz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic vs. open resection for colon cancer-quality of oncologic resection evaluation in a medium volume center.

Authors:  Octavian Enciu; Adelaida Avino; Valentin Calu; Elena Adelina Toma; Adrian Tulin; Raluca Tulin; Iulian Slavu; Laura Răducu; Andra-Elena Balcangiu-Stroescu; Daniela-Elena Gheoca Mutu; Luminiţa Florentina Tomescu; Adrian Miron
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 2.751

7.  The prevalence of laparoscopy and patient safety outcomes: an analysis of colorectal resections.

Authors:  Carrie Y Peterson; Kerrin Palazzi; J Kellogg Parsons; David C Chang; Sonia L Ramamoorthy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Robotic colorectal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sami Alasari; Byung Soh Min
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2012-05-13

9.  Assessing measures of comorbidity and functional status for risk adjustment to compare hospital performance for colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective data-linkage study.

Authors:  Timothy A Dobbins; Tim Badgery-Parker; David C Currow; Jane M Young
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Pricing of surgeries for colon cancer: patient severity and market factors.

Authors:  Avi Dor; Siran Koroukian; Fang Xu; Jonah Stulberg; Conor Delaney; Gregory Cooper
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 6.921

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.