Literature DB >> 21533879

Blood drawn through valved catheter hub connectors carries a significant risk of contamination.

R J Sherertz1, T B Karchmer, E Palavecino, W Bischoff.   

Abstract

Infection Control became concerned when bloodstream infection (BSI) rates increased after implementing a needleless valved hub connector. During a 21-month period three different needleless catheter hub connectors were evaluated by quantitatively culturing blood drawn through hub connectors that would have ordinarily been discarded (DBC). DBC drawn through Clearlink™ catheter hub connectors were found to be twice as likely to be positive as DBC drawn through Clave® or Q-syte™ hub connectors (P < 0.04). DBC grew pathogens 46% of the time and skin organisms 54% of the time. Patients with positive DBC were three times more likely to meet Centers for Disease Control (CDC) BSI criteria by DBC cultures than by physician-ordered blood cultures (CBC; P < 0.001). For patients growing pathogens in DBC, 64% had no CBC drawn, the average temperature was lower than for patients with pathogens in CBC (99.3 ± 1.5 ve 100.6 ± 1.9, P = 0.015), and 92% of discharged patients (11 out of 12) were not treated with an antibiotic active against the DBC pathogen. Drawing BC through a catheter hub connector carries a risk of false-positives that could increase BSI rates by up to 3-fold. Further work is necessary to evaluate this concern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21533879     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-011-1262-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  22 in total

1.  Contamination of catheter-drawn blood cultures.

Authors:  R J Everts; E N Vinson; P O Adholla; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Difference in time to positivity of hub-blood versus nonhub-blood cultures is not useful for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection in critically ill patients.

Authors:  B J Rijnders; C Verwaest; W E Peetermans; A Wilmer; S Vandecasteele; J Van Eldere; E Van Wijngaerden
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 3.  Sensitivity and specificity of blood cultures obtained through intravascular catheters.

Authors:  G P Wormser; I M Onorato; T J Preminger; D Culver; W J Martone
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Diagnosis of catheter-related bacteraemia: a prospective comparison of the time to positivity of hub-blood versus peripheral-blood cultures.

Authors:  F Blot; G Nitenberg; E Chachaty; B Raynard; N Germann; S Antoun; A Laplanche; C Brun-Buisson; C Tancrède
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-09-25       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Comparison of four antiseptic preparations for skin in the prevention of contamination of percutaneously drawn blood cultures: a randomized trial.

Authors:  David P Calfee; Barry M Farr
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Hub qualitative blood culture is useful for diagnosis of catheter-related infections in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Michèle Tanguy; Philippe Seguin; Bruno Laviolle; Laurent Desbordes; Yannick Mallédant
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Contamination rates of blood cultures obtained by dedicated phlebotomy vs intravenous catheter.

Authors:  Alonna Norberg; Norman C Christopher; Maria L Ramundo; John R Bower; Shirley A Berman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-02-12       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Central catheter blood sampling: the impact of changing the needleless caps prior to collection.

Authors:  Alice Mathew; Tracey Gaslin; Kari Dunning; Jun Ying
Journal:  J Infus Nurs       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug

9.  Differentiating culture samples representing coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteremia from those representing contamination by use of time-to-positivity and quantitative blood culture methods.

Authors:  Christelle Kassis; Gopi Rangaraj; Ying Jiang; Ray Y Hachem; Issam Raad
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Increased rate of catheter-related bloodstream infection associated with use of a needleless mechanical valve device at a long-term acute care hospital.

Authors:  Cassandra D Salgado; Libby Chinnes; Tammy H Paczesny; J Robert Cantey
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 3.254

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: A Comprehensive Update on the Problem of Blood Culture Contamination and a Discussion of Methods for Addressing the Problem

Authors:  Gary V Doern; Karen C Carroll; Daniel J Diekema; Kevin W Garey; Mark E Rupp; Melvin P Weinstein; Daniel J Sexton
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Disinfection of Needleless Connector Hubs: Clinical Evidence Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nancy L Moureau; Julie Flynn
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2015-05-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.