Literature DB >> 21531821

Changes in tumor density in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sunitinib.

Sandrine Faivre1, Magaly Zappa, Valérie Vilgrain, Eveline Boucher, Jean-Yves Douillard, Ho Y Lim, Jun S Kim, Seock-Ah Im, Yoon-Koo Kang, Mohamed Bouattour, Safi Dokmak, Chantal Dreyer, Marie-Paule Sablin, Camille Serrate, Ann-Lii Cheng, Silvana Lanzalone, Xun Lin, Maria J Lechuga, Eric Raymond.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) may underestimate the efficacy of targeted therapies. In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) studies with sunitinib, RECIST-defined response rates are low, although hypodensity on computed tomography (CT) scans occurs more frequently. This exploratory analysis investigated tumor density as a surrogate endpoint of sunitinib activity in a phase II HCC study. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Patients received sunitinib 50 mg/d (4 weeks on/2 weeks off). Tumor size and density were assessed on CT scans by using RECIST and Choi criteria, the latter of which classify a partial response as a 15% or more reduction in tumor density or a 10% or more reduction in tumor size. The overall percentage volume of tumor necrosis was calculated with volumetric reconstruction. Tumor perfusion parameters were assessed by using perfusion CT scans with specific acquisition.
RESULTS: Among the 26 evaluable patients, 1 achieved a partial response and 22 had tumor stabilization by RECIST. In analysis of tumor density, 17 of 26 patients (65.4%) were responders by Choi criteria. Volumetric assessment showed major tumor necrosis (≥30% of tumor volume) in 10 of 21 patients (47.6%). Among four patients evaluated, tumor blood flow was reduced by 58.8% and blood volume by 68.4% after 4 weeks of treatment. The median time to progression (TTP) was 6.4 months. Patients with responses by Choi criteria had a significantly longer TTP (7.5 months) compared with nonresponders (4.8 months; HR = 0.33, two-sided P = 0.0182).
CONCLUSIONS: Tumor density assessment suggested that radiologic endpoints in addition to RECIST may be considered to capture sunitinib activity in HCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21531821     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  37 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of antiangiogenic efficacy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Biomarkers and functional imaging.

Authors:  Mohamed Bouattour; Audrey Payancé; Johanna Wassermann
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-09-18

2.  Alternative Response Criteria (Choi, European association for the study of the liver, and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST]) Versus RECIST 1.1 in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib.

Authors:  Maxime Ronot; Mohamed Bouattour; Johanna Wassermann; Onorina Bruno; Chantal Dreyer; Béatrice Larroque; Laurent Castera; Valérie Vilgrain; Jacques Belghiti; Eric Raymond; Sandrine Faivre
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-03-20

Review 3.  Molecularly targeted therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma - a drug development crisis?

Authors:  Kiruthikah Thillai; Paul Ross; Debashis Sarker
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-02-15

4.  Fractal analysis of contrast-enhanced CT images to predict survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sunitinib.

Authors:  Koichi Hayano; Hiroyuki Yoshida; Andrew X Zhu; Dushyant V Sahani
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma: an update.

Authors:  Ying-Chun Shen; Zhong-Zhe Lin; Chih-Hung Hsu; Chiun Hsu; Yu-Yun Shao; Ann-Lii Cheng
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 11.740

6.  Second-line sunitinib as a feasible approach for iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer after the failure of first-line sorafenib.

Authors:  Vincenzo Marotta; Carolina Di Somma; Manila Rubino; Concetta Sciammarella; Roberta Modica; Luigi Camera; Michela Del Prete; Francesca Marciello; Valeria Ramundo; Luisa Circelli; Pasqualina Buonomano; Annamaria Colao; Antongiulio Faggiano
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 7.  Assessment of clinical and radiological response to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Rodolfo Sacco; Valeria Mismas; Antonio Romano; Marco Bertini; Michele Bertoni; Graziana Federici; Salvatore Metrangolo; Giuseppe Parisi; Emanuele Tumino; Giampaolo Bresci; Luca Giacomelli; Sara Marceglia; Irene Bargellini
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-01-27

8.  Hepatocellular carcinoma enhancement on contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging: response assessment after treatment with sorafenib: preliminary results.

Authors:  Giuseppe Salvaggio; Alessandro Furlan; Francesco Agnello; Giuseppe Cabibbo; Daniele Marin; Lydia Giannitrapani; Chiara Genco; Massimo Midiri; Roberto Lagalla; Giuseppe Brancatelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Novel Imaging Diagnosis for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Consensus from the 5th Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert Meeting (APPLE 2014).

Authors:  Bang-Bin Chen; Takamichi Murakami; Tiffany Ting-Fang Shih; Michiie Sakamoto; Osamu Matsui; Byung-Ihn Choi; Myeong-Jin Kim; Jeong Min Lee; Ren-Jie Yang; Meng-Su Zeng; Ran-Chou Chen; Ja-Der Liang
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 11.740

Review 10.  Chemoembolization and radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Riad Salem; Robert J Lewandowski
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.