Literature DB >> 2153137

Immunoelectron microscopic analysis of the A, B, and HU protein content of bacteriophage Mu transpososomes.

B D Lavoie1, G Chaconas.   

Abstract

Stable protein-DNA complexes or transpososomes mediate the Mu DNA strand transfer reaction in vitro (Surette, M. G., Buch, S. J., and Chaconas, G. (1987) Cell 49, 253-262; Craigie, R., and Mizuuchi, K. (1987) Cell 51, 493-501). Formation of the Type 1 complex, an intermediate in the strand transfer reaction, requires the Mu A and Escherichia coli HU proteins. Generation of the Type 2 complex, in which the Mu ends have been covalently linked to the target DNA, requires the Mu B protein, ATP, and target DNA in addition to A and HU. The protein content of these higher order synaptic complexes has been studied by immunoelectron microscopy using protein A-colloidal gold conjugates to visualize antibody-bound complexes. Under our in vitro transposition conditions, Type 1 complexes were found to contain A and HU; in addition, Type 2 complexes contained Mu B. However, both the HU and the Mu B protein were found to be loosely associated and could be quantitatively removed from the nucleoprotein core of both complexes by incubation in 0.5 M NaCl. Depletion of HU from the Type 1 complex did not affect the ability of this complex to be converted into the strand-transferred product. Hence, the indispensable role of the HU protein in the Mu DNA strand transfer reaction is limited to the formation of the Type 1 transpososome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2153137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  19 in total

1.  The RAG1 homeodomain recruits HMG1 and HMG2 to facilitate recombination signal sequence binding and to enhance the intrinsic DNA-bending activity of RAG1-RAG2.

Authors:  V Aidinis; T Bonaldi; M Beltrame; S Santagata; M E Bianchi; E Spanopoulou
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 2.  Handoff from recombinase to replisome: insights from transposition.

Authors:  H Nakai; V Doseeva; J M Jones
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Recruitment of HU by piggyback: a special role of GalR in repressosome assembly.

Authors:  S Kar; S Adhya
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  The DNA-bending protein HMGB1 is a cellular cofactor of Sleeping Beauty transposition.

Authors:  Hatem Zayed; Zsuzsanna Izsvák; Dheeraj Khare; Udo Heinemann; Zoltán Ivics
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Enhancement of Sleeping Beauty transposition by CpG methylation: possible role of heterochromatin formation.

Authors:  Kosuke Yusa; Junji Takeda; Kyoji Horie
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  DNase protection analysis of the stable synaptic complexes involved in Mu transposition.

Authors:  M Mizuuchi; T A Baker; K Mizuuchi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  ClpX protein of Escherichia coli activates bacteriophage Mu transposase in the strand transfer complex for initiation of Mu DNA synthesis.

Authors:  R Kruklitis; D J Welty; H Nakai
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Stimulation of V(D)J cleavage by high mobility group proteins.

Authors:  D C van Gent; K Hiom; T T Paull; M Gellert
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  3'-end processing and kinetics of 5'-end joining during retroviral integration in vivo.

Authors:  T Roe; S A Chow; P O Brown
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Characterization of functionally important sites in the bacteriophage Mu transposase protein.

Authors:  P I Ulycznyj; F Forghani; M S DuBow
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1994-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.