Literature DB >> 21530257

Monkeys recall and reproduce simple shapes from memory.

Benjamin M Basile1, Robert R Hampton.   

Abstract

If you draw from memory a picture of the front of your childhood home, you will have demonstrated recall. You could also recognize this house upon seeing it. Unlike recognition, recall demonstrates memory for things that are not present. Recall is necessary for planning and imagining, and it can increase the flexibility of navigation, social behavior, and other cognitive skills. Without recall, memory is more limited to recognition of the immediate environment. Amnesic patients are impaired on recall tests [1, 2], and recall performance often declines with aging [3]. Despite its importance, we know relatively little about nonhuman animals' ability to recall information; we lack suitable recall tests for them and depend instead on recognition tests to measure nonhuman memory. Here we report that rhesus monkeys can recall simple shapes from memory and reproduce them on a touchscreen. As in humans [4, 5], monkeys remembered less in recall than recognition tests, and their recall performance deteriorated more slowly. Transfer tests showed that monkeys used a flexible memory mechanism rather than memorizing specific actions for each shape. Observation of recall in Old World monkeys suggests that it has been adaptive for over 30 million years [6] and does not depend on language.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21530257      PMCID: PMC3090493          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  17 in total

1.  Dissociating familiarity from recollection in human recognition memory: different rates of forgetting over short retention intervals.

Authors:  Andrew P Yonelinas; Benjamin J Levy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

2.  Recollection-like memory retrieval in rats is dependent on the hippocampus.

Authors:  Norbert J Fortin; Sean P Wright; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs.

Authors:  N D Anderson; F I Craik; M Naveh-Benjamin
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1998-09

4.  Object recognition and location memory in monkeys with excitotoxic lesions of the amygdala and hippocampus.

Authors:  E A Murray; M Mishkin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: the contribution of recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  A P Yonelinas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-11

6.  Differential effects of early hippocampal pathology on episodic and semantic memory.

Authors:  F Vargha-Khadem; D G Gadian; K E Watkins; A Connelly; W Van Paesschen; M Mishkin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-07-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Dissociations of processes in recognition memory: effects of interference and of response speed.

Authors:  A P Yonelinas; L L Jacoby
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1994-12

8.  Unprompted recall and reporting of hidden objects by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) after extended delays.

Authors:  C R Menzel
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  On the relationship between recall and recognition memory.

Authors:  F Haist; A P Shimamura; L R Squire
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Relative sparing of item recognition memory in a patient with adult-onset damage limited to the hippocampus.

Authors:  A R Mayes; J S Holdstock; C L Isaac; N M Hunkin; N Roberts
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.899

View more
  22 in total

1.  Evaluation of seven hypotheses for metamemory performance in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Benjamin M Basile; Gabriel R Schroeder; Emily Kathryn Brown; Victoria L Templer; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-11-03

2.  Two processes support visual recognition memory in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Sebastian Guderian; Danielle Brigham; Mortimer Mishkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Episodic memory in nonhuman animals.

Authors:  Victoria L Templer; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Monkeys show recognition without priming in a classification task.

Authors:  Benjamin M Basile; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Nonnavigational spatial memory performance is unaffected by hippocampal damage in monkeys.

Authors:  Benjamin M Basile; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2018-09-02       Impact factor: 3.899

6.  The adaptive analysis of visual cognition using genetic algorithms.

Authors:  Robert G Cook; Muhammad A J Qadri
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2013-09-02

7.  From distributed resources to limited slots in multiple-item working memory: a spiking network model with normalization.

Authors:  Ziqiang Wei; Xiao-Jing Wang; Da-Hui Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Replay of Episodic Memories in the Rat.

Authors:  Danielle Panoz-Brown; Vishakh Iyer; Lawrence M Carey; Christina M Sluka; Gabriela Rajic; Jesse Kestenman; Meredith Gentry; Sydney Brotheridge; Isaac Somekh; Hannah E Corbin; Kjersten G Tucker; Bianca Almeida; Severine B Hex; Krysten D Garcia; Andrea G Hohmann; Jonathon D Crystal
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 9.  Oscillatory correlates of memory in non-human primates.

Authors:  Michael J Jutras; Elizabeth A Buffalo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Automated cognitive testing of monkeys in social groups yields results comparable to individual laboratory-based testing.

Authors:  Regina Paxton Gazes; Emily Kathryn Brown; Benjamin M Basile; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.