Literature DB >> 21529750

Risk prediction of complex diseases from family history and known susceptibility loci, with applications for cancer screening.

Hon-Cheong So1, Johnny S H Kwan, Stacey S Cherny, Pak C Sham.   

Abstract

Risk prediction based on genomic profiles has raised a lot of attention recently. However, family history is usually ignored in genetic risk prediction. In this study we proposed a statistical framework for risk prediction given an individual's genotype profile and family history. Genotype information about the relatives can also be incorporated. We allow risk prediction given the current age and follow-up period and consider competing risks of mortality. The framework allows easy extension to any family size and structure. In addition, the predicted risk at any percentile and the risk distribution graphs can be computed analytically. We applied the method to risk prediction for breast and prostate cancers by using known susceptibility loci from genome-wide association studies. For breast cancer, in the population the 10-year risk at age 50 ranged from 1.1% at the 5th percentile to 4.7% at the 95th percentile. If we consider the average 10-year risk at age 50 (2.39%) as the threshold for screening, the screening age ranged from 62 at the 20th percentile to 38 at the 95th percentile (and some never reach the threshold). For women with one affected first-degree relative, the 10-year risks ranged from 2.6% (at the 5th percentile) to 8.1% (at the 95th percentile). For prostate cancer, the corresponding 10-year risks at age 60 varied from 1.8% to 14.9% in the population and from 4.2% to 23.2% in those with an affected first-degree relative. We suggest that for some diseases genetic testing that incorporates family history can stratify people into diverse risk categories and might be useful in targeted prevention and screening.
Copyright © 2011 The American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21529750      PMCID: PMC3146722          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  44 in total

1.  Upward bias in odds ratio estimates from genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Chad Garner
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.135

2.  Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits.

Authors:  Lucia A Hindorff; Praveen Sethupathy; Heather A Junkins; Erin M Ramos; Jayashri P Mehta; Francis S Collins; Teri A Manolio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Multifactorial qualitative traits: genetic analysis and prediction of recurrence risks.

Authors:  N R Mendell; R C Elston
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  The multifactorial model for the inheritance of liability to disease and its implications for relatives at risk.

Authors:  R N Curnow
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Recurrence risks for multifactorial inheritance.

Authors:  C Smith
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  The inheritance of liability to diseases with variable age of onset, with particular reference to diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  D S Falconer
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 1.670

8.  Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of medications to reduce risk for primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Rongwei Fu; Jessica C Griffin; Peggy Nygren; M E Beth Smith; Linda Humphrey
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Risk estimation for healthy women from breast cancer families: new insights and new strategies.

Authors:  Christi J van Asperen; M A Jonker; C E Jacobi; J E M van Diemen-Homan; E Bakker; M H Breuning; J C van Houwelingen; G H de Bock
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  34 in total

1.  Analysis of case-control association studies with known risk variants.

Authors:  Noah Zaitlen; Bogdan Pasaniuc; Nick Patterson; Samuela Pollack; Benjamin Voight; Leif Groop; David Altshuler; Brian E Henderson; Laurence N Kolonel; Loic Le Marchand; Kevin Waters; Christopher A Haiman; Barbara E Stranger; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis; Peter Kraft; Alkes L Price
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Explicit Modeling of Ancestry Improves Polygenic Risk Scores and BLUP Prediction.

Authors:  Chia-Yen Chen; Jiali Han; David J Hunter; Peter Kraft; Alkes L Price
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  Improving Disease Prediction by Incorporating Family Disease History in Risk Prediction Models with Large-Scale Genetic Data.

Authors:  Jungsoo Gim; Wonji Kim; Soo Heon Kwak; Hosik Choi; Changyi Park; Kyong Soo Park; Sunghoon Kwon; Taesung Park; Sungho Won
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Cost-Effectiveness of Personalized Screening for Colorectal Cancer Based on Polygenic Risk and Family History.

Authors:  Dayna R Cenin; Steffie K Naber; Anne C de Weerdt; Mark A Jenkins; David B Preen; Hooi C Ee; Peter C O'Leary; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Genetic and environmental components of family history in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Marilyn C Cornelis; Noah Zaitlen; Frank B Hu; Peter Kraft; Alkes L Price
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 6.  Pitfalls of predicting complex traits from SNPs.

Authors:  Naomi R Wray; Jian Yang; Ben J Hayes; Alkes L Price; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 7.  Developing and evaluating polygenic risk prediction models for stratified disease prevention.

Authors:  Nilanjan Chatterjee; Jianxin Shi; Montserrat García-Closas
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Two-Variance-Component Model Improves Genetic Prediction in Family Datasets.

Authors:  George Tucker; Po-Ru Loh; Iona M MacLeod; Ben J Hayes; Michael E Goddard; Bonnie Berger; Alkes L Price
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 9.  The contribution of genetic variants to disease depends on the ruler.

Authors:  John S Witte; Peter M Visscher; Naomi R Wray
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  Cumulative impact of common genetic variants and other risk factors on colorectal cancer risk in 42,103 individuals.

Authors:  Malcolm G Dunlop; Albert Tenesa; Susan M Farrington; Stephane Ballereau; David H Brewster; Thibaud Koessler; Paul Pharoah; Clemens Schafmayer; Jochen Hampe; Henry Völzke; Jenny Chang-Claude; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner; Susanna von Holst; Simone Picelli; Annika Lindblom; Mark A Jenkins; John L Hopper; Graham Casey; David Duggan; Polly A Newcomb; Anna Abulí; Xavier Bessa; Clara Ruiz-Ponte; Sergi Castellví-Bel; Iina Niittymäki; Sari Tuupanen; Auli Karhu; Lauri Aaltonen; Brent Zanke; Tom Hudson; Steven Gallinger; Ella Barclay; Lynn Martin; Maggie Gorman; Luis Carvajal-Carmona; Axel Walther; David Kerr; Steven Lubbe; Peter Broderick; Ian Chandler; Alan Pittman; Steven Penegar; Harry Campbell; Ian Tomlinson; Richard S Houlston
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.