Literature DB >> 21529409

Genomic characterization of Nipah virus, West Bengal, India.

Vidya A Arankalle1, Bhaswati T Bandyopadhyay, Ashwini Y Ramdasi, Ramesh Jadi, Dilip R Patil, Mehebubar Rahman, Monalisa Majumdar, Parthasarthi S Banerjee, Amiyakumar K Hati, Ramaprasad P Goswami, Dhruba Kumar Neogi, Akhilesh C Mishra.   

Abstract

An intrafamilial outbreak in West Bengal, India, involving 5 deaths and person-to-person transmission was attributed to Nipah virus. Full-genome sequence of Nipah virus (18,252 nt) amplified from lung tissue showed 99.2% nt and 99.8% aa identity with the Bangladesh-2004 isolate, suggesting a common source of the virus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21529409      PMCID: PMC3321761          DOI: 10.3201/eid1705.100968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Nipah virus (NiV) causes encephalitis or respiratory signs and symptoms in humans, with high death rates (–). NiV outbreaks have been reported from Malaysia, Bangladesh, Singapore, and India (,–). Cases in humans have been attributed to zoonotic transmission from pigs and bats (,). We describe a full genome sequence of NiV from an outbreak in India.

The Study

During April 9–28, 2007, five persons became ill and died within a few days at village Belechuapara, Nadia district, West Bengal, India, which borders Bangladesh. The index case-patient (case-patient 1) was a 35-year-old male farmer addicted to country liquor derived from palm juice. Hundreds of bats were observed hanging from the trees around his residence, which strongly suggested association with the infection of the index case-patient and possibility of contamination of the liquor with bat excreta or secretions. Three patients were close relatives of case-patient 1: his 25-year-old brother (case-patient 2), his 30-year-old wife (case-patient 3), and his 39-year-old brother-in-law (case-patient 4). They became ill 12, 14, and 14 days, respectively, after contact with case-patient 1. In another person, a 28-year-old man (case-patient 5) who collected blood samples from and performed a computed tomography scan of the brain of case-patient 1, symptoms developed 12 days after contact. No samples were available from the first 2 case-patients. Brain and lung tissues from case-patient 3, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from case-patient 4, and urine and CSF from case-patient 5 were collected. Blood samples were obtained from case-patients 4 and 5 and from 34 asymptomatic contacts from the village. Serum samples from these persons were tested for immunoglobulin (Ig) M and IgG antibodies to NiV (IgM/IgG anti-NiV) with ELISA by using reagents provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, GA, USA). To detect NiV RNA, urine (250 µL), CSF (100 μL), or autopsied brain or lung tissue (100 mg) were used, and RNA was extracted by using TRIzol LS and TRIzol reagents (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Nested reverse transcription–PCR (RT-PCR) was conducted by using nucleocapsid (N) gene–based primers (). Attempts to isolate NiV in Vero E6 cell lines or infant mice were unsuccessful. The full-length genomic sequence was obtained from the lung of case-patient 3 by using 36 sets of primers (Table A1), Superscript II RNase reverse transcriptase for reverse transcription (Invitrogen), and Pfx polymerase for amplification (Invitrogen). The PCR products of predicted molecular size were gel eluted (QIAquick PCR Purification Kit; QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) and sequenced by using BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing Ready Reaction Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and an automatic Sequencer (ABI Prism 3100 Genetic Analyzer; Applied Biosystems). PCR products were sequenced in both directions. To determine the genotypic status, phylogenetic analysis was conducted by using partial N gene and full NiV genome sequences with the Kimura 2-parameter distance model and neighbor-joining method available in MEGA version 3.1 software (www.megasoftware.net). The reliability of phylogenetic groupings was evaluated by the bootstrap test with 1,000 bootstrap replications.
Table A1

Primers used for full genome amplification and sequencing of Nipah virus in an interfamilial outbreak, West Bengal, India, 2007

RegionForward primer, 5′ → 3′Reverse primer, 5′ → 3′
Leader sequence and nucleocapsid protein
F1 1–ACCAAACAAGGGAAAATATGGAT-23R1 287-CTCGGCTGCACTCGGAGATCTGAT-310
F2 17–TATG GATACGTTAA AATATAT-37R2 590-TGATAACTGCAGAGACCAGAGT-611
F3 507–TCAA GACTGCTCGG GACAGCAG-528R3 1115-TCAATAGTAGTAGCCACACCCAT-1137
F4 999–GC TTGATGCTAC TCTACAGAG-1019R4 1595-TGATTGCTGGGTCATCTGTTGCATT-1619
F5 1479-T GACAGTGTGC CGAGCAGTTCTGT-1503R5 2115-TAAGAGGTATTGTATACTCCAGT-2137
F6 1999-CA CACTACACTC TAATAAAGAT-2020
Phosphoprotein
F7 2551-TGCAGTGCAC CAGTGGAGAA TCT-2573R6 2594-CACCTCCATCATCCTTAGAC-2613
F8 3017-TTCT CCTGTGATTG CTGAACACT-3039R7 3081-TCCAAATTGACATTTCTGTTAGT-3103
F9 3528-GAT AAGACTGAGATCACCAGCGA T-3551R8 3627-CAGATGGATATTTCTCGTCTGT-3648
F10 4054-CTTGAGTC TATTGACAGG GTTCT-4075R9 4176-TCACTGGTTTAAGCTCAGGATT-4197
F11 4576-TCTTC TACATGTAGA CAGTAG-4596
R10 4692-TCATGCTACATACACTTCAAT-4712
Matrix protein
F12 5125-GAGCAT TTCAAGTGAG TCT-5143R11 5181-TTATCAAGATACCCACCATTCT-5202
F13 5586-TTGAT CAGATACAGC TCGAC-5605R12 5662-TAGTTCGTGGAATCATGTAGATT-5684
F14 6091-GCCTTCTGTT CCGAGAGAGT T-6111
R13 6123-TGTATTGTCAATGAAGACATCAT-6145
Fusion protein
F15 6621-GTTGGTAGAC CTATCAATCA TAT-6643R14 6713-CACTGCACTCCGAGATCATC-6732
F16 7105-GCAGCA TAGAATCAAC TAATG-7125R15 7161-GCGGTCAGTACATAGACTGT-7180
F17 7522-TCCAACAGG CCTATATCCA AG-7542R16 7570-TGCTGATCCATTCTGAATTGT-7590
F18 8078-GCT CAACGACTCCTTGATACTGT T-8110R17 8130-TACAGTATGATCATAGACAACAT-8152
F19 8638-TGTACTTGCAATT ATACATTGT-8659
Attachment protein
F20 9121-GATCCATTGT AATCATAGTG-9140R18 8723-TATCCAATGAGTTATGGACCT-8743
F21 9630-T ACTTTGCATA TAGCCACCTG-9650R19 9202-TGCTGGATACTCTGCAATGCAT-9223
F22 10099-TC GCAGAGTGTC AATACAGCAA ACCT-10124R20 9698-TGTCTAGTACCTCTCCAACTCCT-9720
F23 10531-GCAACCAGAC CGCAGAGAAT CCT-10553R21 10149-TATAATGACTGTTTGGTCTAAT-10170
F24 11062-TCAGAGTTA ACAGTCTATA CAT-11083
R22 10561-TACTTCATTATCTTTGAATACAG-10583
R23 11104-CATTGATTGTCATCACTATGC-11124
Large polymerase protein
F25 11668-TGC ATATTGCGTA CCCTGAATGT-11690R24 11724-TGTTATCAAGTTTGCTAGTCAT-11745
F26 12151-GGATGATGAT GGAGACAACA AT-12172R25 12200-GAGGGCATTGGACCTCGAGATT-12221
F27 12681-GCACATGCAT CTAAGCATAT-12700R26 12738-TTCCCAGTTCTTGACACAATCATC-12761
F28 13221-TCAGTTCCTC GTGGAAACAG TC-13241R27 13252-TATATTATTGATGGATTGAGGAT-13274
F29 13776-GATGA TATATTCATT CATTATCCT-13779R28 13859-TCTCATAGGCACTCAAGAAT13878
F30 14244-TCAAGGA ATGTCGGCTA TTGTAT-14266R29 14287-TCAGTTGATATAAGGAGTTGCT-14308
F31 14728-TAG CTAGCTTCCT GATGGACAGG-14750R30 14770-TTGTCCAGTATCTCATGAGCGG-14791
F32 15241-GTACAGATGA GAGATCAGAT AT-15262R31 15304-TACTGTCGCAATCCTGATAGCAG-15326
F33 15791-TGATCCAGAT CCTGTTTCAG-15810R32 15872-TGAAGCTCCTCAGTTGACCAT-15892
F34 16381-CTGTGATTAA CCTACGAGAG GATAT-16405R33 16461-TTCAGATCTATTATCCAAGGAGG-16483
F35 17038-CAGGTCAGAGAGA ACTGAAGCT-17059R34 17064-TCAGCAATCGAGTATTCGGATGG-17086
F36 17371-TCTCAAGATT ATTTAACATG T-17391R35 17429-TAGAATCTGGGTTGCTATACACT-17451
F37 17831-TTCACATCAT TTGGAACCGT AT-17852
Trailer sequenceR36 18230-ACCGAACAAGGGTAAAGAAGAAT-18252
Patients’ signs and symptoms included high fever (103°F–105°F [39.4°C–49.6°C]) with and without chills, severe occipital headache, nausea, vomiting, respiratory distress, pain in calf muscles, slurred speech, twitching of facial muscles, altered sensorium, (focal) convulsions, unconsciousness, coma, and death. The first 3 case-patients died within 2–3 days after symptom onset; case-patients 4 and 5 died after 5 and 6 days, respectively. Clinical investigations could be conducted for case-patients 4 and 5. Results of serologic tests for malaria parasite, typhoid, anti-dengue IgM, HIV, and hepatitis B surface antigen were negative. Peripheral blood profiles were within reference limits. Alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, creatine phosphokinase, and C-reactive protein were elevated. Blood gas analysis in case-patient 4 (case-patient 5 values in parentheses) showed oxygen saturation 49.4% (71%), pO2 36.1 mm Hg (44.8 mm Hg), pCO2 44.4mm Hg (44.1 mm Hg), HCO3 15.7 mmol/L (19.1 mmol/L), and pH 7.166 (7.255). Lumbar puncture of case-patient 5 showed opening pressure within reference range (1 drop/second), 2 cells/cm; all cells observed were lymphocytes. Chest radiograph indicated pulmonary edema, which suggested acute respiratory distress syndrome. At the time of admission, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans of the brain showed no abnormality. Serum samples from case-patients 4 and 5 were positive for IgM anti-NiV. Of the clinical samples screened, brain and lung tissues of case-patient 3, CSF of case-patient 4, and urine of case-patient 5 were NiV RNA positive. Of the 34 asymptomatic contacts, 1 was positive for IgG anti-NiV and negative for IgM anti-NiV and did not report any major illness in the past. This positivity may reflect a previous subclinical infection or cross-reactivity in ELISA needing further follow-up. Before this report, similar cases had not been reported from the village or the surrounding area. Partial N gene sequences confirmed NiV in the clinical specimens from all 3 case-patients. Phylogenetic analysis showed that similar to findings from the 2001 outbreak study (), viruses from Bangladesh and India clustered and diverged from the viruses from Malaysia. (Figure, panel A). The length of the full genome of the isolate from India was 18,252 nt. The sequence of this virus (INDNipah-07–1, GenBank accession no. FJ513078) was closer to the virus from Bangladesh (Figure, panel B), with 99.2% (151 nt substitutions) and 99.80% (17 aa substitutions) identity at nucleotide and amino acid levels respectively. Of the 151 nt substitutions, 9 occurred in the N open reading frame (ORF),11 in the phosphoprotein ORF, 8 in the matrix ORF, 11 in the fusion glycoprotein ORF, 7 in the attachment protein ORF, and 47 in the large polymerase ORF. Fifty-eight substitutions occurred in nontranslated regions at the beginning and the end of each ORF. The intergenic sequences between gene boundaries were highly conserved in the isolate from India, compared with the isolate from Bangladesh, which showed 1 change (GAA to UAA) between the attachment protein and large polymerase genes. No change was observed in the leader and the trailer sequences.
Figure

A) Phylogenetic analysis based on partial nucleocapsid (N) gene nucleotide sequences (159 nt, according to Nipah virus [NiV] Bangladesh sequence, GenBank accession no. AY988601, 168–327 nt) of the 4 NiVs sequenced during this study (boldface). Five sequences of the viruses from Siliguri () and from representative NiV sequences obtained from GenBank indicated by the respective accession numbers. Values at different nodes denote bootstrap support. B) Full genome–based phylogenetic analysis of the NiV sequenced from the lung tissue of a patient (boldface). Representative NiV sequences obtained from GenBank are indicated by the respective accession numbers. Values at different nodes denote bootstrap support. Scale bars indicate nucleotide substitutions per site.

A) Phylogenetic analysis based on partial nucleocapsid (N) gene nucleotide sequences (159 nt, according to Nipah virus [NiV] Bangladesh sequence, GenBank accession no. AY988601, 168–327 nt) of the 4 NiVs sequenced during this study (boldface). Five sequences of the viruses from Siliguri () and from representative NiV sequences obtained from GenBank indicated by the respective accession numbers. Values at different nodes denote bootstrap support. B) Full genome–based phylogenetic analysis of the NiV sequenced from the lung tissue of a patient (boldface). Representative NiV sequences obtained from GenBank are indicated by the respective accession numbers. Values at different nodes denote bootstrap support. Scale bars indicate nucleotide substitutions per site. The Table compares amino acid substitutions in the different regions of the genome of the isolate from India with those of the viruses from Bangladesh and Malaysia. Of the 17 aa substitutions, 7 were unique to the isolate from India, and 10 were similar to the isolates from Malaysia. Overall, however, the isolate from India was closer to the isolate from Bangladesh, although distinct differences were observed. *GenBank accession numbers of isolates examined: India (FJ513078), Bangladesh (AY988601), and Malaysia (AY029767,AY029768, and AJ564623). Boldface indicates unique amino acids in the isolate from India. To our knowledge, this is the second report of an NiV outbreak in India, identified within 1 week of the investigation. The first outbreak affected mainly hospital staff or persons visiting hospitalized patients; the 74% case-fatality rate strongly suggested person-to-person transmission (). Both outbreaks (2001 and 2007) occurred in the state of West Bengal bordering Bangladesh wherein several outbreaks of the disease have been reported (,–). However, fruit bats from West Bengal have not been screened for evidence of NiV infection. This state needs to create awareness about NiV and obligatory testing of suspected case-patients.

Conclusions

NiV caused an intrafamilial outbreak with a 100% case-fatality rate, which confirmed person-to-person transmission. The NiV strains from India and Bangladesh were closer than the Malaysian viruses. Although the outbreaks occurred in neighboring geographic areas, NiV outbreaks in Bangladesh and India were not caused by the same virus strain or by spillover.
Table

Regionwise amino acid substitutions in the Nipah virus genome*

Region and amino acid positionIndiaBangladeshMalaysia
Phosphoprotein
228 K RR
276 S GG
285RHR
310
R
G
G
Nucleocapsid protein
188EDE
211
R
Q
Q
Matrix protein
13
I
M
M
Fusion protein
19 I MM
207LSL
252
D
G
D
Attachment protein
304
V
I
I
Large polymerase protein
94ITI
112KRK
632NSN
639NDN
665TIT
1748IVI

*GenBank accession numbers of isolates examined: India (FJ513078), Bangladesh (AY988601), and Malaysia (AY029767,AY029768, and AJ564623). Boldface indicates unique amino acids in the isolate from India.

  11 in total

1.  Nipah virus outbreak(s) in Bangladesh, January-April 2004.

Authors: 
Journal:  Wkly Epidemiol Rec       Date:  2004-04-23

2.  Nipah virus: a recently emergent deadly paramyxovirus.

Authors:  K B Chua; W J Bellini; P A Rota; B H Harcourt; A Tamin; S K Lam; T G Ksiazek; P E Rollin; S R Zaki; W Shieh; C S Goldsmith; D J Gubler; J T Roehrig; B Eaton; A R Gould; J Olson; H Field; P Daniels; A E Ling; C J Peters; L J Anderson; B W Mahy
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Outbreak of Nipah-virus infection among abattoir workers in Singapore.

Authors:  N I Paton; Y S Leo; S R Zaki; A P Auchus; K E Lee; A E Ling; S K Chew; B Ang; P E Rollin; T Umapathi; I Sng; C C Lee; E Lim; T G Ksiazek
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-10-09       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Fatal encephalitis due to Nipah virus among pig-farmers in Malaysia.

Authors:  K B Chua; K J Goh; K T Wong; A Kamarulzaman; P S Tan; T G Ksiazek; S R Zaki; G Paul; S K Lam; C T Tan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-10-09       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Person-to-person transmission of Nipah virus in a Bangladeshi community.

Authors:  Emily S Gurley; Joel M Montgomery; M Jahangir Hossain; Michael Bell; Abul Kalam Azad; Mohammed Rafiqul Islam; Mohammed Abdur Rahim Molla; Darin S Carroll; Thomas G Ksiazek; Paul A Rota; Luis Lowe; James A Comer; Pierre Rollin; Markus Czub; Allen Grolla; Heinz Feldmann; Stephen P Luby; Jennifer L Woodward; Robert F Breiman
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.883

6.  Clinical presentation of nipah virus infection in Bangladesh.

Authors:  M Jahangir Hossain; Emily S Gurley; Joel M Montgomery; Michael Bell; Darin S Carroll; Vincent P Hsu; P Formenty; A Croisier; E Bertherat; M A Faiz; Abul Kalam Azad; Rafiqul Islam; M Abdur Rahim Molla; Thomas G Ksiazek; Paul A Rota; James A Comer; Pierre E Rollin; Stephen P Luby; Robert F Breiman
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Foodborne transmission of Nipah virus, Bangladesh.

Authors:  Stephen P Luby; Mahmudur Rahman; M Jahangir Hossain; Lauren S Blum; M Mushtaq Husain; Emily Gurley; Rasheda Khan; Be-Nazir Ahmed; Shafiqur Rahman; Nazmun Nahar; Eben Kenah; James A Comer; Thomas G Ksiazek
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  Nipah virus encephalitis reemergence, Bangladesh.

Authors:  Vincent P Hsu; Mohammed Jahangir Hossain; Umesh D Parashar; Mohammed Monsur Ali; Thomas G Ksiazek; Ivan Kuzmin; Michael Niezgoda; Charles Rupprecht; Joseph Bresee; Robert F Breiman
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Recurrent zoonotic transmission of Nipah virus into humans, Bangladesh, 2001-2007.

Authors:  Stephen P Luby; M Jahangir Hossain; Emily S Gurley; Be Nazir Ahmed; Shakila Banu; Salah Uddin Khan; Nusrat Homaira; Paul A Rota; Pierre E Rollin; James A Comer; Eben Kenah; Thomas G Ksiazek; Mahmudur Rahman
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Nipah virus-associated encephalitis outbreak, Siliguri, India.

Authors:  Mandeep S Chadha; James A Comer; Luis Lowe; Paul A Rota; Pierre E Rollin; William J Bellini; Thomas G Ksiazek; Akhilesh Mishra
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  54 in total

Review 1.  Nipah virus matrix protein: expert hacker of cellular machines.

Authors:  Ruth E Watkinson; Benhur Lee
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.124

2.  Detection of Nipah virus RNA in fruit bat (Pteropus giganteus) from India.

Authors:  Pragya D Yadav; Chandrashekhar G Raut; Anita M Shete; Akhilesh C Mishra; Jonathan S Towner; Stuart T Nichol; Devendra T Mourya
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  Computational prediction of miRNAs in Nipah virus genome reveals possible interaction with human genes involved in encephalitis.

Authors:  Sandeep Saini; Chander Jyoti Thakur; Varinder Kumar; Suchita Tandon; Varuni Bhardwaj; Sonia Maggar; Stanzin Namgyal; Gurpreet Kaur
Journal:  Mol Biol Res Commun       Date:  2018-09

Review 4.  Transmission of henipaviruses.

Authors:  Sarah Weatherman; Heinz Feldmann; Emmie de Wit
Journal:  Curr Opin Virol       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 7.090

5.  Evolving epidemiology of Nipah virus infection in Bangladesh: evidence from outbreaks during 2010-2011.

Authors:  A Chakraborty; H M S Sazzad; M J Hossain; M S Islam; S Parveen; M Husain; S S Banu; G Podder; S Afroj; P E Rollin; P Daszak; S P Luby; M Rahman; E S Gurley
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 2.451

Review 6.  Zoonotic Potential of Emerging Paramyxoviruses: Knowns and Unknowns.

Authors:  Patricia A Thibault; Ruth E Watkinson; Andres Moreira-Soto; Jan F Drexler; Benhur Lee
Journal:  Adv Virus Res       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 9.937

7.  Nipah virus infection: current scenario.

Authors:  D D Kulkarni; C Tosh; G Venkatesh; D Senthil Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Virol       Date:  2013-11-07

8.  Biochemical, conformational, and immunogenic analysis of soluble trimeric forms of henipavirus fusion glycoproteins.

Authors:  Yee-Peng Chan; Min Lu; Somnath Dutta; Lianying Yan; Jennifer Barr; Michael Flora; Yan-Ru Feng; Kai Xu; Dimitar B Nikolov; Lin-Fa Wang; Georgios Skiniotis; Christopher C Broder
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Nipah Virus C and W Proteins Contribute to Respiratory Disease in Ferrets.

Authors:  Benjamin A Satterfield; Robert W Cross; Karla A Fenton; Viktoriya Borisevich; Krystle N Agans; Daniel J Deer; Jessica Graber; Christopher F Basler; Thomas W Geisbert; Chad E Mire
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 10.  Animal models of disease shed light on Nipah virus pathogenesis and transmission.

Authors:  Emmie de Wit; Vincent J Munster
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 7.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.