This article describes RegioSelectivity-Predictor (RS-Predictor), a new in silico method for generating predictive models of P450-mediated metabolism for drug-like compounds. Within this method, potential sites of metabolism (SOMs) are represented as "metabolophores": A concept that describes the hierarchical combination of topological and quantum chemical descriptors needed to represent the reactivity of potential metabolic reaction sites. RS-Predictor modeling involves the use of metabolophore descriptors together with multiple-instance ranking (MIRank) to generate an optimized descriptor weight vector that encodes regioselectivity trends across all cases in a training set. The resulting pathway-independent (O-dealkylation vs N-oxidation vs Csp(3) hydroxylation, etc.), isozyme-specific regioselectivity model may be used to predict potential metabolic liabilities. In the present work, cross-validated RS-Predictor models were generated for a set of 394 substrates of CYP 3A4 as a proof-of-principle for the method. Rank aggregation was then employed to merge independently generated predictions for each substrate into a single consensus prediction. The resulting consensus RS-Predictor models were shown to reliably identify at least one observed site of metabolism in the top two rank-positions on 78% of the substrates. Comparisons between RS-Predictor and previously described regioselectivity prediction methods reveal new insights into how in silico metabolite prediction methods should be compared.
This article describes RegioSelectivity-Predictor (RS-Predictor), a new in silico method for generating predictive models of n class="Gene">P450-mediated metabolism for drug-like compounds. Within this method, potential sites of metabolism (SOMs) are represented as "metabolophores": A concept that describes the hierarchical combination of topological and quantum chemical descriptors needed to represent the reactivity of potential metabolic reaction sites. RS-Predictor modeling involves the use of metabolophore descriptors together with multiple-instance ranking (MIRank) to generate an optimized descriptor weight vector that encodes regioselectivity trends across all cases in a training set. The resulting pathway-independent (O-dealkylation vs N-oxidation vs Csp(3) hydroxylation, etc.), isozyme-specific regioselectivity model may be used to predict potential metabolic liabilities. In the present work, cross-validated RS-Predictor models were generated for a set of 394 substrates of CYP 3A4 as a proof-of-principle for the method. Rank aggregation was then employed to merge independently generated predictions for each substrate into a single consensus prediction. The resulting consensus RS-Predictor models were shown to reliably identify at least one observed site of metabolism in the top two rank-positions on 78% of the substrates. Comparisons between RS-Predictor and previously described regioselectivity prediction methods reveal new insights into how in silico metabolite prediction methods should be compared.
Authors: Diansong Zhou; Lovisa Afzelius; Scott W Grimm; Tommy B Andersson; Randy J Zauhar; Ismael Zamora Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2006-03-15 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Peter S Bazeley; Sridevi Prithivi; Craig A Struble; Richard J Povinelli; Daniel S Sem Journal: J Chem Inf Model Date: 2006 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.956
Authors: Thrimoorthy Potta; Zhuo Zhen; Taraka Sai Pavan Grandhi; Matthew D Christensen; James Ramos; Curt M Breneman; Kaushal Rege Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Johannes Kirchmair; Andreas H Göller; Dieter Lang; Jens Kunze; Bernard Testa; Ian D Wilson; Robert C Glen; Gisbert Schneider Journal: Nat Rev Drug Discov Date: 2015-04-24 Impact factor: 84.694
Authors: Angelica Mazzolari; Avid M Afzal; Alessandro Pedretti; Bernard Testa; Giulio Vistoli; Andreas Bender Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2019-02-12 Impact factor: 4.345
Authors: Jianing Li; Severin T Schneebeli; Joseph Bylund; Ramy Farid; Richard A Friesner Journal: J Chem Theory Comput Date: 2011-11-08 Impact factor: 6.006
Authors: Johannes Kirchmair; Mark J Williamson; Jonathan D Tyzack; Lu Tan; Peter J Bond; Andreas Bender; Robert C Glen Journal: J Chem Inf Model Date: 2012-02-17 Impact factor: 4.956