BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Diffuse C4d staining in peritubular capillaries (PTCs) during an acute rejection episode (ARE) is the footprint of antibody-mediated rejection. In current clinical practice, diffuse C4d+ staining during acute rejection is regarded as an inferior prognostic sign. This case-control study investigated the prognostic role of mere C4d staining for graft outcome during an ARE in a well defined cohort of similarly ARE-treated patients. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: All kidney transplant recipients in the authors' center from January 1, 1995 to December 31, 2005 were reviewed. From these patients, 151 had a clinical ARE. Paraffin and/or frozen material was available for 128 patients showing a histologically proven ARE within the first 6 months after transplantation. All ARE patients were treated similarly with high-dose pulse steroids and in the case of steroid unresponsiveness with anti-thymocyte globulin. Biopsies were scored according to Banff criteria. Frozen and paraffin sections were stained by immunofluorescence (IF) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for C4d, respectively, and scored for PTC positivity. RESULTS: Diffuse C4d+ staining in PTCs was found in 12.5% and 4.2% sections stained by IF or by IHC, respectively. Four patients showed diffuse positive staining with both methods but showed no different risk profile from other patients. No relation between C4d staining and clinical parameters at baseline was found. C4d staining was not associated with steroid responsiveness, graft, or patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that C4d staining is not related to clinical outcome in this cohort of histologically proven early AREs.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Diffuse C4d staining in peritubular capillaries (PTCs) during an acute rejection episode (ARE) is the footprint of antibody-mediated rejection. In current clinical practice, diffuse C4d+ staining during acute rejection is regarded as an inferior prognostic sign. This case-control study investigated the prognostic role of mere C4d staining for graft outcome during an ARE in a well defined cohort of similarly ARE-treated patients. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: All kidney transplant recipients in the authors' center from January 1, 1995 to December 31, 2005 were reviewed. From these patients, 151 had a clinical ARE. Paraffin and/or frozen material was available for 128 patients showing a histologically proven ARE within the first 6 months after transplantation. All ARE patients were treated similarly with high-dose pulse steroids and in the case of steroid unresponsiveness with anti-thymocyte globulin. Biopsies were scored according to Banff criteria. Frozen and paraffin sections were stained by immunofluorescence (IF) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for C4d, respectively, and scored for PTC positivity. RESULTS: Diffuse C4d+ staining in PTCs was found in 12.5% and 4.2% sections stained by IF or by IHC, respectively. Four patients showed diffuse positive staining with both methods but showed no different risk profile from other patients. No relation between C4d staining and clinical parameters at baseline was found. C4d staining was not associated with steroid responsiveness, graft, or patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that C4d staining is not related to clinical outcome in this cohort of histologically proven early AREs.
Authors: K Solez; R B Colvin; L C Racusen; M Haas; B Sis; M Mengel; P F Halloran; W Baldwin; G Banfi; A B Collins; F Cosio; D S R David; C Drachenberg; G Einecke; A B Fogo; I W Gibson; D Glotz; S S Iskandar; E Kraus; E Lerut; R B Mannon; M Mihatsch; B J Nankivell; V Nickeleit; J C Papadimitriou; P Randhawa; H Regele; K Renaudin; I Roberts; D Seron; R N Smith; M Valente Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2008-02-19 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Michael Eikmans; Marian C Roos-van Groningen; Yvo W J Sijpkens; Jan Ehrchen; Johannes Roth; Hans J Baelde; Ingeborg M Bajema; Johan W de Fijter; Emile de Heer; Jan A Bruijn Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2005-10-26 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Judith E Worthington; Anna McEwen; Lorna J McWilliam; Michael L Picton; Susan Martin Journal: Transplantation Date: 2007-02-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: M J Everly; J J Everly; L J Arend; P Brailey; B Susskind; A Govil; A Rike; P Roy-Chaudhury; G Mogilishetty; R R Alloway; A Tevar; E S Woodle Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2009-03-16 Impact factor: 8.086