Literature DB >> 18360261

Acute renal allograft rejection: diagnostic significance of focal peritubular capillary C4d.

Liise K Kayler1, Lawrence Kiss, Vivek Sharma, Ravi Mohanka, Adriana Zeevi, Alin Girnita, Ron Shapiro, Parmjeet S Randhawa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Focal PTC C4d staining in acute renal allograft rejection has not been studied extensively.
METHODS: Renal allograft biopsies performed after October 2003, representing the first episode of acute rejection (AR) in recipients with > or = 12 months follow-up postbiopsy, were assessed for extent of C4d and correlated with morphology, ELISA screen, donor-specific antibodies (DSA), response to treatment, and outcome.
RESULTS: In 106 biopsies (16 C4d-diffuse; 24 C4d-focal; 66 C4d-negative), there were no differences among the three groups in terms of timing or grade of AR, creatinine level, tacrolimus level, and grade of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy or graft loss. The C4d-diffuse group was significantly associated with less tubulitis (P=0.0021), and more chronic allograft arteriopathy (P=0.0527). Incomplete response to steroid therapy was more frequent in C4d-diffuse/focal compared with negative cases (P=0.0492). DSA frequency within 1 year of AR was highest in the C4d-diffuse (94%), followed by C4d-focal (38%), and C4d-negative (17%) groups (P<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Focal PTC C4d was associated with circulating antibodies, with a 2-fold greater diagnostic sensitivity than negative C4d staining. The finding of diffuse C4d on follow-up biopsy was significantly associated with graft loss at 1 year, regardless of index biopsy C4d results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18360261     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181669194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  6 in total

1.  C4d staining in renal allograft biopsies with early acute rejection and subsequent clinical outcome.

Authors:  Johanna M Botermans; Hanneke de Kort; Michael Eikmans; Klaas Koop; Hans J Baelde; Marko J K Mallat; Kim Zuidwijk; Cees van Kooten; Emile de Heer; Natascha N T Goemaere; Frans H J Claas; Jan A Bruijn; Johan W de Fijter; Ingeborg M Bajema; Marian C van Groningen
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 2.  Complement in organ transplantation.

Authors:  Elham Asgari; Wuding Zhou; Steven Sacks
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.640

3.  Impact of donor-specific antibodies on the outcomes of kidney graft: Pathophysiology, clinical, therapy.

Authors:  Maurizio Salvadori; Elisabetta Bertoni
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-03-24

Review 4.  Clinical efficacy of rituximab for acute rejection in kidney transplantation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Gang Zhao; Bing-Yi Shi; Ye-Yong Qian; Hong-Wei Bai; Li Xiao; Xiu-Yun He
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-17       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Differential Treatment Effects for Renal Transplant Recipients With DSA-Positive or DSA-Negative Antibody-Mediated Rejection.

Authors:  Marius Andreas Koslik; Justa Friebus-Kardash; Falko Markus Heinemann; Andreas Kribben; Jan Hinrich Bräsen; Ute Eisenberger
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-31

6.  Multiplex gene analysis reveals T-cell and antibody-mediated rejection-specific upregulation of complement in renal transplants.

Authors:  Kerstin Amann; Christoph Daniel; Eva Vonbrunn; Tajana Ries; Stefan Söllner; Janina Müller-Deile; Maike Büttner-Herold
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.