Literature DB >> 21526953

Molecular pathology of breast cancer: the journey from traditional practice toward embracing the complexity of a molecular classification.

Aaron M Gruver1, Bryce P Portier, Raymond R Tubbs.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Adenocarcinoma of the breast is the most frequent cancer affecting women in both developed and developing regions of the world. From the moment of clinical presentation until the time of pathologic diagnosis, patients affected by this disease will face daunting questions related to prognosis and treatment options. While improvements in targeted therapies have led to increased patient survival, these same advances have created the imperative to accurately stratify patients to achieve maximum therapeutic efficacy while minimizing side effects. In this evolving era of personalized medicine, there is an ever-increasing need to overcome the limitations of traditional diagnostic practice.
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the molecular diagnostics traditionally used to guide prognostication and treatment of breast carcinomas, to highlight published data on the molecular classification of these tumors, and to showcase molecular assays that will supplement traditional methods of categorizing the disease. DATA SOURCES: A review of the literature covering the molecular diagnostics of breast carcinomas with a focus on the gene expression and array studies used to characterize the molecular signatures of the disease. Special emphasis is placed on summarizing evolving technologies useful in the diagnosis and characterization of breast carcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS: Available and emerging molecular resources will allow pathologists to provide superior diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive information about individual breast carcinomas. These advances should translate into earlier identification and tailored therapy and should ultimately improve outcome for patients affected by this disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21526953     DOI: 10.5858/2010-0734-RAIR.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  10 in total

1.  Invasive breast cancer: a significant correlation between histological types and molecular subgroups.

Authors:  A Caldarella; C Buzzoni; E Crocetti; S Bianchi; V Vezzosi; P Apicella; M Biancalani; A Giannini; C Urso; F Zolfanelli; E Paci
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Somatic variation and cancer: therapies lost in the mix.

Authors:  Andrew V Biankin; Thomas J Hudson
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 5.881

Review 3.  Recent advances in the use of metformin: can treating diabetes prevent breast cancer?

Authors:  Diana Hatoum; Eileen M McGowan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Aberrant DNA Double-strand Break Repair Threads in Breast Carcinoma: Orchestrating Genomic Insult Survival.

Authors:  Azad Kumar; Shruti Purohit; Nilesh Kumar Sharma
Journal:  J Cancer Prev       Date:  2016-12-30

5.  Breast cancer in Ethiopia: evidence for geographic difference in the distribution of molecular subtypes in Africa.

Authors:  Endale Hadgu; Daniel Seifu; Wondemagegnhu Tigneh; Yonas Bokretsion; Abebe Bekele; Markos Abebe; Thomas Sollie; Sofia D Merajver; Christina Karlsson; Mats G Karlsson
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 2.809

6.  Phenotypic drift as a cause for intratumoral morphological heterogeneity of invasive ductal breast carcinoma not otherwise specified.

Authors:  Marina V Zavyalova; Evgeny V Denisov; Lubov A Tashireva; Tatiana S Gerashchenko; Nikolay V Litviakov; Nikolay A Skryabin; Sergey V Vtorushin; Nadezhda S Telegina; Elena M Slonimskaya; Nadezhda V Cherdyntseva; Vladimir M Perelmuter
Journal:  Biores Open Access       Date:  2013-04

7.  Are breast cancer molecular classes predictive of survival in patients with long follow-up?

Authors:  Danae Pracella; Serena Bonin; Renzo Barbazza; Anna Sapino; Isabella Castellano; Sandro Sulfaro; Giorgio Stanta
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.434

Review 8.  Computational prognostic indicators for breast cancer.

Authors:  Xinan Yang; Xindi Ai; John M Cunningham
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  Ras protein expression as a marker for breast cancer.

Authors:  Gloria M Calaf; Jorge Abarca-Quinones
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  DNER promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and prevents chemosensitivity through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in breast cancer.

Authors:  Zhong Wang; Zhiyu Li; Qi Wu; Chenyuan Li; Juanjuan Li; Yimin Zhang; Changhua Wang; Si Sun; Shengrong Sun
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 8.469

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.