Literature DB >> 21526381

Assessment of two novel surgical positions for the reduction of scoliotic deformities: lateral leg displacement and hip torsion.

Christopher Driscoll1, Carl-Eric Aubin, Hubert Labelle, Jean Dansereau.   

Abstract

Cobb angles and apical vertebral rotations (AVR) are two of the main scoliosis deformity parameters which spinal instrumentation and fusion techniques aim to reduce. Despite this importance, current surgical positioning techniques do not allow the reduction of these parameters. Two new surgical frame accessory prototypes have been developed: (1) a lateral leg displacer (LLD) allows lateral bending of a patient's legs up to 75° in either direction and (2) a pelvic torsion device (PTD) which allows transverse plane twisting of a patient's pelvis at 30° in either direction while raising the thoracic cushion, opposite to the raised side of the pelvis, by 5 cm. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of the LLD and PTD to reduce Cobb angles and AVR. Experimental testing was performed pre-operatively on 12 surgical scoliosis patients prone on an experimental surgical frame. Postero-anterior radiographs of their spines were taken in the neutral prone position on a surgical frame, and then again for 6 with their legs bent towards the convexity of their lowest structural curve, 4 with their pelvis raised on the convex side of their lowest structural curve and one each in opposite LLD and PTD intended use. Use of the LLD allowed for an average supplementary reduction of 16° (39%) for Cobb angle and 9° (33%) for AVR in the lowest structural curve. Use of the PTD allowed for an average supplementary reduction of 9° (19%) for Cobb angle and 17° (48%) for AVR in the lowest structural curve. Both devices were most efficient on thoraco-lumbar/lumbar curves. Opposite of intended use resulted in an increase in both Cobb angle and AVR. The LLD and PTD provide interesting novel methods to reduce Cobb angles and AVR through surgical positioning which can be used to facilitate instrumentation procedures by offering an improved intra-operative geometry of the spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21526381      PMCID: PMC3175873          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1801-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  13 in total

Review 1.  The effect of intraoperative traction during posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; Hubert Labelle; Benoit Poitras; Charles-Hilaire Rivard; Julie Joncas
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Impact of prone surgical positioning on the scoliotic spine.

Authors:  Christopher Robert Driscoll; Carl-Éric Aubin; Fanny Canet; Hubert Labelle; Jean Dansereau
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2012-05

3.  Partial correction of Cobb angle prior to posterior spinal instrumentation.

Authors:  Y M Behairy; D L Hauser; D Hill; J Mahood; M Moreau
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2000 Sep-Nov       Impact factor: 1.526

4.  A study of vertebral rotation.

Authors:  C L Nash; J H Moe
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  New methods of measuring vertebral rotation from computed tomographic scans. An intraobserver and interobserver study on girls with scoliosis.

Authors:  E K Ho; S S Upadhyay; F L Chan; L C Hsu; J C Leong
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Pre-, intra-, and postoperative three-dimensional evaluation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  S Delorme; H Labelle; B Poitras; C H Rivard; C Coillard; J Dansereau
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2000-04

7.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis.

Authors:  L G Lenke; R R Betz; J Harms; K H Bridwell; D H Clements; T G Lowe; K Blanke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Perioperative halo-gravity traction in the treatment of severe scoliosis and kyphosis.

Authors:  Anthony Rinella; Lawrence Lenke; Camden Whitaker; Yongjung Kim; Soo-sung Park; Michael Peelle; Charles Edwards; Charles Edwards; Keith Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Nighttime bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with the Charleston bending brace. Preliminary report.

Authors:  C T Price; D S Scott; F E Reed; M F Riddick
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Dynamic positioning of scoliotic patients during spine instrumentation surgery.

Authors:  Kajsa Duke; Carl-Eric Aubin; Jean Dansereau; Annick Koller; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2009-05
View more
  2 in total

1.  Lowest instrumented vertebra selection in Lenke 3C and 6C scoliosis: what if we choose lumbar apical vertebra as distal fusion end?

Authors:  Yu Wang; Cody Eric Bünger; Yanqun Zhang; Ebbe Stender Hansen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Factors affecting pelvic rotation in idiopathic scoliosis: Analysis of 85 cases in a single center.

Authors:  Yunfei Zhao; Lin Qi; Jun Yang; Xiaodong Zhu; Changwei Yang; Ming Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.889

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.