Literature DB >> 15706347

Perioperative halo-gravity traction in the treatment of severe scoliosis and kyphosis.

Anthony Rinella1, Lawrence Lenke, Camden Whitaker, Yongjung Kim, Soo-sung Park, Michael Peelle, Charles Edwards, Charles Edwards, Keith Bridwell.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of patients that underwent perioperative halo-gravity traction as an adjunct to modern instrumentation methods in the treatment of severe scoliosis and kyphosis.
OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical and radiographic results of perioperative halo-gravity traction in several time periods. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few reports to our knowledge review the use of perioperative and intraoperative halo-gravity traction in this patient population.
METHODS: A total of 33 patients with severe operative scoliosis, kyphoscoliosis, or kyphosis were studied based on hospital records, standing pretreatment, traction (before anterior/posterior fusion), postoperative (each stage), and final radiographs. Patients were analyzed by age at date of examination (range, 2-20 years; mean, 13.8 years), gender (18 male, 15 female), major coronal curve magnitude (range, 22 degrees-158 degrees; average, 84 degrees), major compensatory coronal curve magnitude (range, 8 degrees-123 degrees; average, 51 degrees), major sagittal curve magnitude (range, 13 degrees-143 degrees; average, 78 degrees), traction protocol, and procedure type. Halo-traction-related, short- and long-term complications were noted in each case.
RESULTS: The major coronal curve reduced 38 degrees or 46% after posterior spinal fusion compared to pretreatment radiographs. At an average of 44 months radiographic follow-up (range, 24-107 months), the loss of correction averaged 7 degrees for major coronal curves and 4 degrees of thoracic kyphosis. Clinical complications were noted in the perioperative and long-term time periods.
CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of severe scoliosis can be very challenging despite the benefits of modern instrumentation methods, especially if there is a significant kyphosis or a history of intraspinal pathology. Halo-gravity traction is a safe, well-tolerated method of applying gradual, sustained traction to maximize postoperative correction in this difficult population. There were no permanent neurologic deficits in this series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15706347     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000153707.80497.a2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  34 in total

1.  Anterior and posterior vertebral column resection for severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Chunguang Zhou; Limin Liu; Yueming Song; Hao Liu; Tao Li; Quan Gong; Jiancheng Zeng; Qingquan Kong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Three-staged correction of severe rigid idiopathic scoliosis using limited halo-gravity traction.

Authors:  Wael Koptan; Yasser ElMiligui
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Halo-gravity traction in the treatment of severe spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Changsheng Yang; Huafeng Wang; Zhaomin Zheng; Zhongmin Zhang; Jianru Wang; Hui Liu; Yongjung Jay Kim; Samuel Cho
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The use of three rods in correcting severe scoliosis.

Authors:  Brett Rocos; Eliane Rioux-Trottier; Masayoshi Machida; Amit Sigal; Jim Kennedy; David E Lebel; Reinhard Zeller
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-02-10

5.  Halogravity traction in the preoperative treatment of scoliosis in twins with Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  Mislav Cimic; Kresimir Crnogaca; Ozren Vrdoljak; Goran Bicanic
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-06-01

6.  Magnetically controlled growing rods for rigid scoliosis : An alternative to halo-gravity traction in preparing for definitive correction?

Authors:  R Aldeeri; H Almansour; Y Kentar; S Hemmer; W Pepke; M Akbar
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 7.  How helpful is the halo-gravity traction in severe spinal deformity patients?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jianqiang Wang; Bo Han; Yong Hai; Qingjun Su; Yuxiang Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  A novel radiographic classification of severe spinal curvatures exceeding 100°: the Omega (Ω), gamma (γ) and alpha (α) deformities.

Authors:  Isaac Obiri Karikari; Henry Pang; Kwadwo Poku Yankey; Henry Ofori Duah; Harry Akoto; Rick Hodes; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Congenital scoliosis - Quo vadis?

Authors:  Ujjwal K Debnath; Vivek Goel; Nanjanduppa Harshavardhana; John K Webb
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Posterior fusion only for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of more than 80 degrees: pedicle screws versus hybrid instrumentation.

Authors:  Mario Di Silvestre; Georgios Bakaloudis; Francesco Lolli; Francesco Vommaro; Konstantinos Martikos; Patrizio Parisini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.