Tom Z Lu1, Zhong-Ping Feng. 1. Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
The resting membrane potential of the pacemaker neurons is one of the essential mechanisms underlying rhythm generation. In this study, we described the biophysical properties of an uncharacterized channel (U-type channel) and investigated the role of the channel in the rhythmic activity of a respiratory pacemaker neuron and the respiratory behaviour in adult freshwater snail Lymnaea stagnalis. Our results show that the channel conducts an inward leak current carried by Na(+) (I(Leak-Na)). The I(Leak-Na) contributed to the resting membrane potential and was required for maintaining rhythmic action potential bursting activity of the identified pacemaker RPeD1 neurons. Partial knockdown of the U-type channel suppressed the aerial respiratory behaviour of the adult snail in vivo. These findings identified the Na(+) leak conductance via the U-type channel, likely a NALCN-like channel, as one of the fundamental mechanisms regulating rhythm activity of pacemaker neurons and respiratory behaviour in adult animals.
The resting membrane potential of the pacemaker neurons is one of the essential mechanisms underlying rhythm generation. In this study, we described the biophysical properties of an uncharacterized channel (U-type channel) and investigated the role of the channel in the rhythmic activity of a respiratory pacemaker neuron and the respiratory behaviour in adult freshwater snail Lymnaea stagnalis. Our results show that the channel conducts an inward leak current carried by Na(+) (I(Leak-Na)). The I(Leak-Na) contributed to the resting membrane potential and was required for maintaining rhythmic action potential bursting activity of the identified pacemaker RPeD1 neurons. Partial knockdown of the U-type channel suppressed the aerial respiratory behaviour of the adult snail in vivo. These findings identified the Na(+) leak conductance via the U-type channel, likely a NALCN-like channel, as one of the fundamental mechanisms regulating rhythm activity of pacemaker neurons and respiratory behaviour in adult animals.
The rhythmic activities of the central pattern generator neurons (CPG) are essential
for numerous biological functions, including brain development [1], [2], locomotion [3], energy balance [4], and respiration
[5], [6]. The true CPG
pacemaker neurons are capable of generating intrinsic bursting rhythms in dependent
of synaptic input. One conserved mechanism that is a prerequisite for spontaneous
rhythmic activity of pacemaker neurons is regulation of the resting membrane
potential (RMP). K+ leak has been the classical mechanism to
describe regulation of the RMP [7]; however the highly depolarized membrane potential of many
pacemaker neurons suggests additional current components [4], [5], [8], [9]. The principles of rhythm generation
and its modulation are conserved across species [10], [11].The great pond snail, Lymnaea stagnalis (L.
stagnalis), is a bimodal breather [12] and its aerial respiratory
activity can be easily described by measuring frequency and opening duration of the
respiratory gas-exchange orifice (pneumostome). The aerial respiration of L.
stagnalis is controlled by a simple well-described rCPG network
consisting of three large identified neurons [13], including one intrinsic
pacemaker neuron, the right pedal dorsal 1 (RPeD1), that initiates rCPG rhythmic
activity [13], [14]. The pacemaker
neuron RPeD1 exhibits rhythmic activity characterized by intermittent action
potential bursts [10], [15]. L. stagnalis thus has been used as an
animal model to study rCPG properties and regulation [10], [15], [16].A putative ion channel (GenBank accession numbers, AF484086 and AF484085) has been
partially cloned from L. stagnalis and named the U-type channel for
an unknown voltage-gated cation channel [17]. Our protein sequence
alignment [18] showed
that the pore region this uncharacterized putative ion channel has a 55%
identity with the non-selective cation channel conducting Na+ leak
current, NALCN (Sodium Leak Channel Non-selective) [9] of mouse (GenBank: NP_796367) and
human (GenBank: NP_443099), and 56% or 45% identity with the NALCN
orthologue of D. melanogaster (GenBank: AAN77520), and C.
elegans isoforms NCA-1 (GenBank: NP_741413) and NCA-2 (GenBank:
NP_498054), respectively. Specifically, this U-type channel has high homology in the
pore and S4 region to its orthologues (
). Therefore, we hypothesize that the U-type
channel exhibits similar biophysical properties to its orthologues, NALCN channels,
and regulates the RMP [9].
Figure 1
Protein sequence alignments of the U-type pore and S4 regions with the
NALCNs.
Regional protein sequences of the U-type channel from Lymnaea
stagnalis (GenBank AAO85435 and AAO84496) were aligned with
NALCN channel from Homo sapien (GenBank NP_443099) and Mus
musculus (GenBank NP_796367), NCA-1 (GenBank NP_741413)
and NCA-2 (GenBank NP_498054) from Caenorhabditis elegans,
and α1U from Drosophila melanogaster (GenBank
AY160083). Positive residues of the S4 region are highly conserved across
different species. Pore forming sequence shows high degree of homology with
a notable switch between the transmembrane domain II and III.
Protein sequence alignments of the U-type pore and S4 regions with the
NALCNs.
Regional protein sequences of the U-type channel from Lymnaea
stagnalis (GenBank AAO85435 and AAO84496) were aligned with
NALCN channel from Homo sapien (GenBank NP_443099) and Mus
musculus (GenBank NP_796367), NCA-1 (GenBank NP_741413)
and NCA-2 (GenBank NP_498054) from Caenorhabditis elegans,
and α1U from Drosophila melanogaster (GenBank
AY160083). Positive residues of the S4 region are highly conserved across
different species. Pore forming sequence shows high degree of homology with
a notable switch between the transmembrane domain II and III.In this study, we investigated the biophysical properties and involvement of the
U-type channel in the rhythmic activity of the rCPG pacemaker RPeD1 neuron, and in
the aerial respiratory behaviour of the snail, using an RNAi gene silencing approach
combined with electrophysiological recordings.
Results
The U-type channels regulate the resting membrane potential and are a
prerequisite for RPeD1 pacemaker activity
To determine whether U-type channels are involved in regulating the RMP, we took
advantages of the siRNA gene silencing approach to reduce the expression level
of U-type channels, as described previously [19]–[21]. We first
determined the efficiency of the acute knockdown of U-type channel expression.
Real-time PCR analysis (
) showed that ganglionic expression level
of U-type mRNA transcripts was reduced by ∼50% when either dsRNA or
either siRNA specific to the U-type gene was applied in vivo
for 3–4 days. We then isolated the respiratory pacemaker neuron, RPeD1,
from whole animals that were injected with control dsRNA/siRNA or U-type
dsRNA/siRNA for 3 days, and cultured these neurons in respective RNAi treatments
overnight. Intracellular sharp electrode recordings from these treated cells
show that the RMP, recorded with zero current injection (
) was more
hyperpolarized and input resistance (
) increased in the
U-type dsRNA group relative to those of the controls. These data suggest that
the U-type channel may conduct current that is required to maintain the RMP at
the more depolarized potential.
Figure 2
Effects of the U-type dsRNA on rhythmic firing and intrinsic membrane
properties in RPeD1 neurons.
(A) U-type specific dsRNA/siRNA in vivo knockdown was
confirmed with real-time qPCR analysis. Expression ratio of the U-type
channel to β-actin mRNAs in different experimental groups was
normalized to naïve control ratio: control dsRNA
(n = 7), U-type dsRNA (n = 7),
control siRNA (n = 12), U-type siRNA 1
(n = 8), and U-type siRNA 2
(n = 7). * indicate significant difference
(P<0.05) to the corresponding control dsRNA or control siRNA
treatment. Isolated individual RPeD1 neurons were maintained in culture
in conditioned media (CM), CM + control dsRNA, or CM + U-type
dsRNA, and recording was conduced within 24 hours following isolation.
(B) Average resting membrane potentials of naïve control
(n = 14), control dsRNA
(n = 7), and U-type dsRNA
(n = 9) treated neurons recorded 2 min after
impaling cells. (C) Average input resistance of naïve control
(n = 20), control dsRNA
(n = 8), and U-type dsRNA
(n = 13) treated neurons. (D1) Representative
action potential traces of naïve control, control dsRNA, and U-type
dsRNA pre-treated neurons recorded at resting membrane potentials, and
U-type dsRNA pre-treated neuron depolarized to −45 mV. (D2)
Distribution curves of inter spike durations for naïve control
neurons (n = 10), control dsRNA neurons
(n = 4), U-type dsRNA neurons
(n = 5), and U-type dsRNA neurons
(n = 5) depolarized to −45 mV. Total
inter-spike count is 940 in naïve control, 346 in control dsRNA, 0
in U-type dsRNA, and 304 in U-type dsRNA depolarized to −45 mV.
Distributions were best fitted with 4 terms Gaussian curve. All
significant difference (P<0.05) between naïve control and U-type
dsRNA treatment is denoted by *. All significant different
(P<0.05) between control dsRNA and U-type dsRNA treatment is denoted
by †.
Effects of the U-type dsRNA on rhythmic firing and intrinsic membrane
properties in RPeD1 neurons.
(A) U-type specific dsRNA/siRNA in vivo knockdown was
confirmed with real-time qPCR analysis. Expression ratio of the U-type
channel to β-actin mRNAs in different experimental groups was
normalized to naïve control ratio: control dsRNA
(n = 7), U-type dsRNA (n = 7),
control siRNA (n = 12), U-type siRNA 1
(n = 8), and U-type siRNA 2
(n = 7). * indicate significant difference
(P<0.05) to the corresponding control dsRNA or control siRNA
treatment. Isolated individual RPeD1 neurons were maintained in culture
in conditioned media (CM), CM + control dsRNA, or CM + U-type
dsRNA, and recording was conduced within 24 hours following isolation.
(B) Average resting membrane potentials of naïve control
(n = 14), control dsRNA
(n = 7), and U-type dsRNA
(n = 9) treated neurons recorded 2 min after
impaling cells. (C) Average input resistance of naïve control
(n = 20), control dsRNA
(n = 8), and U-type dsRNA
(n = 13) treated neurons. (D1) Representative
action potential traces of naïve control, control dsRNA, and U-type
dsRNA pre-treated neurons recorded at resting membrane potentials, and
U-type dsRNA pre-treated neuron depolarized to −45 mV. (D2)
Distribution curves of inter spike durations for naïve control
neurons (n = 10), control dsRNA neurons
(n = 4), U-type dsRNA neurons
(n = 5), and U-type dsRNA neurons
(n = 5) depolarized to −45 mV. Total
inter-spike count is 940 in naïve control, 346 in control dsRNA, 0
in U-type dsRNA, and 304 in U-type dsRNA depolarized to −45 mV.
Distributions were best fitted with 4 terms Gaussian curve. All
significant difference (P<0.05) between naïve control and U-type
dsRNA treatment is denoted by *. All significant different
(P<0.05) between control dsRNA and U-type dsRNA treatment is denoted
by †.To test indeed that the U-type channel regulates the pacemaker activities, we
compared firing patterns of the spontaneous action potentials in control and
U-type knockdown preparations. The distribution of the durations between action
potentials (intra-spike interval) over 20 minutes of recordings were analyzed to
characterize the burst firing pattern. Naïve control and control RNA groups
(
) have similar spike patterns and the
inter-spike intervals in the isolated RPeD1 cells showed two populations of
shorter intervals (0.40 s, and 0.79 s) in the control groups. Surprisingly, no
spontaneous activity was observed at resting membrane potential in all the
U-type dsRNA treated cells (
). To test whether these
activity patterns differed between groups because of the more hyperpolarized
membrane potential of RPeD1 neurons in the U-type dsRNA group, we injected a
compensatory current to depolarize the membrane potential to −45 mV,
thereby approximating the RMP of the control cells (
). Interesting, the
U-type pre-treated neurons resumed rhythmic firing (
), albeit
with a different rhythmic distribution (
). In
contrast, the AP properties, including the AP amplitude, rise constant, decay
constant, and half-width constant, were similar between the U-type dsRNA and the
control groups (data no shown). The results demonstrated that U-type expression
within the pacemaker neuron, RPeD1, affected spontaneous rhythmic activity.
U-type channels conducted an inward Na+ leak current at
hyperpolarizing voltages
Major determinant of the RMP is the leak conductance. To investigate whether
U-type channels conduct a leak current, we first established a two-step
recording protocol in a whole-cell configuration to segregate a linear leak
current from the voltage-dependent hyperpolarizing current. The representative
recordings in
show that the inward hyperpolarizing current (total current)
recorded from RPeD1 contained two components; a non-linear and a linear leak
current. The total hyperpolarizing current was initially recorded at
hyperpolarizing step voltages in order to limit activation of major
voltage-gated channels (
). The non-linear hyperpolarizing current
was recorded at the identical voltage steps with an online leak-subtraction
protocol. The linear leak current (ILeak) component was obtained by
subtracting the non-linear current from the total current. The current
density-voltage relations for the total, non-linear and linear currents are
shown in
. The two components of the total hyperpolarizing current
are clearly separated by the recording protocols (
). We then used the
established protocol to determine whether ILeak is conducted by
U-type channels in RPeD1 neurons. As shown in the representative recordings of
, the leak current was reduced in the RPeD1
cells pre-treated with U-type channel dsRNA/siRNAs. The current - voltage
(I–V) relation of the ILeak conductance of U-type dsRNA treated
RPeD1 neurons was significantly reduced at all the tested voltage-steps,
relative to both the untreated naïve controls and the control dsRNA treated
neurons (
). Similar results were observed in U-type
siRNA treated groups. In contrast, the non-linear hyperpolarizing current in
RPeD1 neurons was not affected by RNAi treatment (
and
). These findings indicate that the U-type channel
contributes in part to the ILeak component of the RPeD1 cells at
hyperpolarizing voltages.
Figure 3
Whole-cell current in individual RPeD1 neurons isolated from
naïve control animals.
(A) Representative hyperpolarizing inward current density traces of the
total current, non-linear voltage-dependent current and inward leak
currents from one individual RPeD1 neuron. (B) Average current
density-voltage (I–V) relation of the total current
(n = 7), the non-linear current
(n = 7) and the leak current
(n = 7) recorded from seven RPeD1 neurons. All data
were represented as mean ± S.E.M.
U-type RNAi treatment reduces inward hyperpolarizing Ileak.
(A1) Representative ILeak, and (A2) average current
density-voltage (I–V) relation of the hyperpolarizing inward
ILeak in RPeD1 cells from naïve control
(n = 8), control dsRNA
(n = 5), U-type dsRNA (n = 7),
control siRNA (n = 3), U-type siRNA 1
(n = 4), and U-type siRNA 2
(n = 4) treated RPeD1 neuron. ILeak at
all hyperpolarizing voltages reduced significantly in the U-type
dsRNA/siRNAs groups as compared to the control groups (P<0.05). (C)
Non-linear leak component was not significantly affected by the U-type
RNAi treatment. (B1) Representative non-linear component, and (B2)
average current density-voltage relations of the non-linear component
for naïve control (n = 15), control dsRNA
(n = 7), U-type dsRNA (n = 5),
control siRNA (n = 4), U-type siRNA 1
(n = 4), and U-type siRNA 2
(n = 4).
Whole-cell current in individual RPeD1 neurons isolated from
naïve control animals.
(A) Representative hyperpolarizing inward current density traces of the
total current, non-linear voltage-dependent current and inward leak
currents from one individual RPeD1 neuron. (B) Average current
density-voltage (I–V) relation of the total current
(n = 7), the non-linear current
(n = 7) and the leak current
(n = 7) recorded from seven RPeD1 neurons. All data
were represented as mean ± S.E.M.
U-type RNAi treatment reduces inward hyperpolarizing Ileak.
(A1) Representative ILeak, and (A2) average current
density-voltage (I–V) relation of the hyperpolarizing inward
ILeak in RPeD1 cells from naïve control
(n = 8), control dsRNA
(n = 5), U-type dsRNA (n = 7),
control siRNA (n = 3), U-type siRNA 1
(n = 4), and U-type siRNA 2
(n = 4) treated RPeD1 neuron. ILeak at
all hyperpolarizing voltages reduced significantly in the U-type
dsRNA/siRNAs groups as compared to the control groups (P<0.05). (C)
Non-linear leak component was not significantly affected by the U-type
RNAi treatment. (B1) Representative non-linear component, and (B2)
average current density-voltage relations of the non-linear component
for naïve control (n = 15), control dsRNA
(n = 7), U-type dsRNA (n = 5),
control siRNA (n = 4), U-type siRNA 1
(n = 4), and U-type siRNA 2
(n = 4).The reversal potential of our observed leak current was not at −70 mV
(approximate reversal potential of K+), suggesting additional
contributing components. Therefore, we next tested whether Na+
is conducted through U-type channel using an ion substitution approach. We first
determine whether U-type channels conduct a Na+ current that
contribute to membrane potential regulation, by measuring changes in the
membrane potential in a Na+-free bath solution. As shown in
, the membrane potential became more
hyperpolarized when Na+ was substituted with equimolar
NMDG+ in all the control groups, but no significant change
was observed in the U-type dsRNA or siRNA groups. The data are summarized in
. A ∼10 mV difference in the membrane
potential was observed from the control cells in Na+-free
condition which was in agreement with the change in the resting membrane
potential after dsRNA or siRNA treatment (
). We then used
whole-cell (ruptured) recording to identify whether Na+ current
through U-type channel contributes to the ILeak. As shown in representative
current recordings of
and I–V relation curves of
, the ILeak recorded at the
hyperpolarizing voltages decreased in the naïve control, control dsRNA, and
control siRNA treated RPeD1 neurons, when Na+ in the bath
solution was substituted with equimolar NMDG+. In contrast, the
current recorded with the same hyperpolarizing protocol in the U-type channel
dsRNA/siRNA groups was not affected by the Na+-free solution.
The data are summarized in
that the leak conductance
was significantly reduced in Na+-free solution (P<0.05) only
in the control groups, but not in the U-type channel knockdown groups. We
compared the Na+ current components by subtracting the current
recording in Na+-free condition from the total
Na+ current in saline between the controls and the U-type
knockdown groups. We found that U-type knockdown significantly reduced the
inward hyperpolarizing Na+ currents, further confirming that a
large component of the Na+ current was conducted by the U-type
channels (). To test whether the Na+ leak
current is sensitive to tetrodotoxin (TTX), a selective blocker of voltage-gated
sodium channel, we first studied the IC50 value of the voltage-gated
sodium channels in RPeD1 neurons to TTX. An IC50 value of ∼25 mM
TTX was observed (), which was in a good
agreement with that observed in the cerebral giant cells of L.
stagnalis
[22],
indicating the snail channels are intrinsically less sensitive to TTX block as
compared with the mammalian channels. To ensure sufficient TTX concentration,
100 µM TTX (∼4 fold of the IC50 value for the snail
voltage-gated Na channels) was perfused, however no change was observed in the
ILeak (
). These findings indicate that the U-type channel
carries a TTX-insensitive leak Na+- current
(ILeak-Na) in RPeD1 cells, which directly regulates the RMP.
Figure 5
ILeak conducted by the U-type channel in RPeD1 cells is
carried by Na+ ions.
(A1) Representative voltage traces of naïve control, control
dsRNA/siRNA, and U-type dsRNA/siRNA 1 & 2 with and without
Na+ free saline perfusion. (A2) Average voltage
difference between Na+ free perfusion and saline
perfusion for naïve control (n = 9), control
dsRNA (n = 6), U-type dsRNA
(n = 6), control siRNA
(n = 6), U-type siRNA 1
(n = 6), U-type siRNA 2
(n = 4). (B1) Representative ILeak in
RPeD1 cells from naïve control, control dsRNA/siRNA, and U-type
dsRNA/siRNA 1&2, at hyperpolarizing voltages in saline or
Na+ free solution (B2) Representative
ILeak density-voltage (I–V) relations of naïve
control, control dsRNA/siRNA, and U-type dsRNA/siRNA 1&2 in saline
or Na+ free solution. (B3) comparison of the average
normalized ILeak in Na+ free solution over
saline at −160 mV, −110 mV, and −60 mV for naïve
control (n = 8), control dsRNA
(n = 6), U-type dsRNA (n = 7),
control siRNA (n = 4), U-type siRNA 1
(n = 4), and U-type siRNA 2
(n = 4). A significant reduction in normalized
ILeak under Na+ free condition was
observed in RPeD1 cells from the naïve control and control
dsRNA/siRNA groups, but not from U-type dsRNA/siRNA groups. All
significant difference (P<0.05) between Na+ free
saline current normalized to saline is denoted by *. The dashed line
represents the current activity in saline. (C) Application of 100
µM TTX did not significantly affect Ileak. (C1)
Representative leak current traces of naive control neurons in saline,
100 µM TTX, and saline wash under a hyperpolarizing step voltage
protocol. (C2) Representative current-voltage relation for the leak
current observed in saline, 100 µM TTX, and saline wash. Line
represents a linear fit. (C3) Summary of relative current density of 100
µM TTX normalized to that in saline at various hyperpolarizing
voltages: −160 mV (n = 5), −110 mV
(n = 5) and −60 mV
(n = 5). No significant difference was observed in
the normalized currents among all the groups.
ILeak conducted by the U-type channel in RPeD1 cells is
carried by Na+ ions.
(A1) Representative voltage traces of naïve control, control
dsRNA/siRNA, and U-type dsRNA/siRNA 1 & 2 with and without
Na+ free saline perfusion. (A2) Average voltage
difference between Na+ free perfusion and saline
perfusion for naïve control (n = 9), control
dsRNA (n = 6), U-type dsRNA
(n = 6), control siRNA
(n = 6), U-type siRNA 1
(n = 6), U-type siRNA 2
(n = 4). (B1) Representative ILeak in
RPeD1 cells from naïve control, control dsRNA/siRNA, and U-type
dsRNA/siRNA 1&2, at hyperpolarizing voltages in saline or
Na+ free solution (B2) Representative
ILeak density-voltage (I–V) relations of naïve
control, control dsRNA/siRNA, and U-type dsRNA/siRNA 1&2 in saline
or Na+ free solution. (B3) comparison of the average
normalized ILeak in Na+ free solution over
saline at −160 mV, −110 mV, and −60 mV for naïve
control (n = 8), control dsRNA
(n = 6), U-type dsRNA (n = 7),
control siRNA (n = 4), U-type siRNA 1
(n = 4), and U-type siRNA 2
(n = 4). A significant reduction in normalized
ILeak under Na+ free condition was
observed in RPeD1 cells from the naïve control and control
dsRNA/siRNA groups, but not from U-type dsRNA/siRNA groups. All
significant difference (P<0.05) between Na+ free
saline current normalized to saline is denoted by *. The dashed line
represents the current activity in saline. (C) Application of 100
µM TTX did not significantly affect Ileak. (C1)
Representative leak current traces of naive control neurons in saline,
100 µM TTX, and saline wash under a hyperpolarizing step voltage
protocol. (C2) Representative current-voltage relation for the leak
current observed in saline, 100 µM TTX, and saline wash. Line
represents a linear fit. (C3) Summary of relative current density of 100
µM TTX normalized to that in saline at various hyperpolarizing
voltages: −160 mV (n = 5), −110 mV
(n = 5) and −60 mV
(n = 5). No significant difference was observed in
the normalized currents among all the groups.
U-type channel conductance is pharmacologically similar to reported NALCN
channel conductance
An ILeak-Na is conducted by NALCN channels at rest [9]. These channels
are non-sensitive to TTX [9], and can be partially blocked with
Gd3+
[9] and activated
by low [Ca]o
[23]. We thus
asked whether our observed TTX-insensitive ILeak has similar
pharmacological properties to NALCN channels. We first tested whether
Gd3+ applications would affect ILeak. As shown
the representative recordings in
and I–V curves in
, 10 µM Gd3+ suppressed
the ILeak in the control groups, but with minimal effect in U-type
dsRNA/siRNA treated groups. Gd3+ significantly reduced the
normalized leak current in the groups (P<0.05), but slightly enhanced the
current in the U-type RNAi groups (summarised in
). The
Gd3+-blocked current component in the control groups was
smaller (
) than the Na-dependent leak current component
(
); therefore, our findings indicate that
Gd3+ only partially blocks the ILeak-Na conducted
by U-type channel. To further confirm that a partial blockade by
Gd3+ affects the functional properties of U-type channel, we
measured the membrane potential of RPeD1 in saline containing 10 µM
Gd3+. The membrane potential in the control cells was
reduced by ∼5 mV in Gd3+ condition (
) but was not affected
by Gd3+ in U-type knockdown group, consistent with our
voltage-clamp data showing that Gd3+ partially blocked leak
current of RPeD1.
Figure 6
Gd3+ partially blocked ILeak via the
U-type channels in RPeD1 neurons.
(A) ILeak conducted by the U-type channel is partially blocked
by Gd3+. Representative ILeak (A1) and
ILeak - voltage (I–V) relations (A2) of naïve
control, control dsRNA/siRNA, and U-type dsRNA/siRNA 1&2 in saline
with or without 10 µM Gd3+. (B3) Average
normalized ILeak in 10 µM Gd3+ over
saline at -160 mV, −110 mV, and −60 mV for naïve
control (n = 4), control dsRNA
(n = 4), U-type dsRNA (n = 3),
control siRNA (n = 4), U-type siRNA 1
(n = 4), and U-type siRNA 2
(n = 4). The dashed line represents the current
activity in saline. 10 µM Gd3+ reduced
significantly the ILeak in the naïve control and control
dsRNA/siRNA groups, but not in U-type dsRNA/siRNA groups. Data are
presented as mean ± SEM. Significant difference (P<0.05)
between Na+ free saline current normalized to saline is
denoted by *. (B) 10 µM Gd3+ hyperpolarized
the membrane potential. (B1) Representative records of the membrane
potentials of RPeD1 from naïve control, control dsRNA/siRNA, and
U-type dsRNA/siRNA group. 1 & 2 indicate perfusion with and without
10 µM Gd3+, respectively. (B2) Average difference
of the membrane potential by 10 µM Gd3+ in
naïve control (n = 4), control dsRNA
(n = 3), U-type dsRNA (n = 4),
control siRNA (n = 3), U-type siRNA 1
(n = 4), U-type siRNA 2
(n = 3) groups. * and † indicate the
significant difference (P<0.05) between naïve control and U-type
RNAi treatment and between control RNAi and U-type RNAi treatment,
respectively.
Gd3+ partially blocked ILeak via the
U-type channels in RPeD1 neurons.
(A) ILeak conducted by the U-type channel is partially blocked
by Gd3+. Representative ILeak (A1) and
ILeak - voltage (I–V) relations (A2) of naïve
control, control dsRNA/siRNA, and U-type dsRNA/siRNA 1&2 in saline
with or without 10 µM Gd3+. (B3) Average
normalized ILeak in 10 µM Gd3+ over
saline at -160 mV, −110 mV, and −60 mV for naïve
control (n = 4), control dsRNA
(n = 4), U-type dsRNA (n = 3),
control siRNA (n = 4), U-type siRNA 1
(n = 4), and U-type siRNA 2
(n = 4). The dashed line represents the current
activity in saline. 10 µM Gd3+ reduced
significantly the ILeak in the naïve control and control
dsRNA/siRNA groups, but not in U-type dsRNA/siRNA groups. Data are
presented as mean ± SEM. Significant difference (P<0.05)
between Na+ free saline current normalized to saline is
denoted by *. (B) 10 µM Gd3+ hyperpolarized
the membrane potential. (B1) Representative records of the membrane
potentials of RPeD1 from naïve control, control dsRNA/siRNA, and
U-type dsRNA/siRNA group. 1 & 2 indicate perfusion with and without
10 µM Gd3+, respectively. (B2) Average difference
of the membrane potential by 10 µM Gd3+ in
naïve control (n = 4), control dsRNA
(n = 3), U-type dsRNA (n = 4),
control siRNA (n = 3), U-type siRNA 1
(n = 4), U-type siRNA 2
(n = 3) groups. * and † indicate the
significant difference (P<0.05) between naïve control and U-type
RNAi treatment and between control RNAi and U-type RNAi treatment,
respectively.We then test whether the U-type channel properties are affected by low
[Ca]o. As shown the representative recordings in
and I–V curves in
, 0.5 mM
[Ca]o depolarized the membrane potential in the control
groups, but with a minimal effect in U-type dsRNA/siRNA treated groups. The low
[Ca]o also significantly enhanced the normalized leak
current in the control groups (P<0.05), but with no significant effect on the
current in the U-type RNAi groups (
). Taken together, our data suggest
similar pharmacological properties between U-type channels and NALCN
channels.
Figure 7
Low extracellular Ca2+ depolarizes the membrane
potential by enhancing U-type channel activity in RPeD1 neurons.
(A) U-type channel knockdown prevents low extracellular
Ca2+-induced membrane depolarization. (A1)
Representative voltage traces of naive control, control siRNA, and
U-type siRNA treated RPeD1 neurons perfused with saline,
Na+ free or low Ca2+ saline. Partial
U-type knockdown reduces membrane hyperpolarization by
Na+ free solution or depolarization by 0.5 mM
Ca2+. (A2) Average voltage differences of naive
control (n = 4), control siRNA
(n = 5), and U-type siRNA
(n = 4) treated RPeD1 under Na+
free or 0.5 mM Ca2+ perfusion. (B) Low extracellular
Ca2+ increased Ileak is reduced in U-type
knockdown. (B1) Representative Ileak traces of naive control,
control siRNA, and U-type siRNA treated RPeD1 in saline,
Na+ free, and 0.5 mM Ca2+ solution.
(B2) Average ILeak normalized to saline of naive control
(n = 5), control siRNA
(n = 4), and U-type siRNA
(n = 4) treated RPeD1 in Na+ free,
and 0.5 mM Ca2+ at −100 mV. The dashed line
represents the current activity in saline. Data are presented as mean
± SEM. * and † indicate significant difference
(P<0.05) between naïve control and U-type RNAi treatment and
control RNAi and U-type RNAi treatment, respectively.
Low extracellular Ca2+ depolarizes the membrane
potential by enhancing U-type channel activity in RPeD1 neurons.
(A) U-type channel knockdown prevents low extracellular
Ca2+-induced membrane depolarization. (A1)
Representative voltage traces of naive control, control siRNA, and
U-type siRNA treated RPeD1 neurons perfused with saline,
Na+ free or low Ca2+ saline. Partial
U-type knockdown reduces membrane hyperpolarization by
Na+ free solution or depolarization by 0.5 mM
Ca2+. (A2) Average voltage differences of naive
control (n = 4), control siRNA
(n = 5), and U-type siRNA
(n = 4) treated RPeD1 under Na+
free or 0.5 mM Ca2+ perfusion. (B) Low extracellular
Ca2+ increased Ileak is reduced in U-type
knockdown. (B1) Representative Ileak traces of naive control,
control siRNA, and U-type siRNA treated RPeD1 in saline,
Na+ free, and 0.5 mM Ca2+ solution.
(B2) Average ILeak normalized to saline of naive control
(n = 5), control siRNA
(n = 4), and U-type siRNA
(n = 4) treated RPeD1 in Na+ free,
and 0.5 mM Ca2+ at −100 mV. The dashed line
represents the current activity in saline. Data are presented as mean
± SEM. * and † indicate significant difference
(P<0.05) between naïve control and U-type RNAi treatment and
control RNAi and U-type RNAi treatment, respectively.
Partial U-type channel knockdown reduced the aerial respiratory behaviour in
adult animal in vivo
Having established that U-type channel knockdown slows firing rhythmic properties
of isolated RPeD1 neurons (
), we next investigated whether the U-type
channel plays a role in regulation of respiratory behaviour the adult animal
in vivo. We measured aerial respiratory activity of the
snails from the naïve control, control dsRNA or U-type dsRNA treated
groups.
shows that the total duration of pneumostome opening of the
U-type dsRNA group (55.8±7.1 s; n = 17; p<0.05)
during the 1 hour observation period was significantly reduced relative to the
naïve control (134.60±17.76 s; n = 24) and
control dsRNA (123.8±15.9 s; n = 13) groups.
Interestingly, the averaged duration of opening event (
) only slightly
decreased in U-type dsRNA group (21.09±1.46 s; P>0.05), whereas the
number of opening events (
) was significantly reduced
(2.68±0.31; P<0.05). Acute U-type channel gene knockdown was confirmed
using real-time qPCR (
); U-type specific dsRNA treated animals exhibiting a
reduced total breathing time showed significantly low U-type mRNA expression
level ratio (0.81±0.15; P<0.05) as compared to the naive control
(1.545±0.40) and control dsRNA group (1.77±0.15). These
observations support the hypothesis that U-type channel plays an important role
in maintaining the respiratory activity in adult animal via regulation of rCPG
rhythmic activity by regulating the resting membrane potential of the pacemaker
neurons.
Figure 8
Acute U-type dsRNA knockdown suppresses aerial respiratory behaviour
in adult L. stagnalis in vivo.
Summary of the (A) total breathing time, (B) duration per opening event,
and (C) number of opening events for naïve control
(n = 24), control dsRNA
(n = 13), and U-type dsRNA injected snails
(n = 17). U-type dsRNA injected snails only showed
significant reduction in total breathing time (55.82±7.13 s) and
number of opening events (2.65±0.31) when compared to naive
control (total breathing time of 134.60±17.76 s and
5.42±0.36 opening events) and control dsRNA (total breathing time
of 123.77±15.82 s and 4.94±0.45 opening events). Average
opening duration for U-type dsRNA (21.09±1.46 s) injected group
is not significantly different from the naive control (24.85±1.51
s) and control dsRNA (25.05±2.86 s) injected snails. (D) Summary
of real-time PCR performed following behavior experiments. Ganglia from
U-type dsRNA injected snails that showed decrease in aerial respiratory
behavior were used to confirm U-type channel knockdown with real-time
qPCR. The result was then compared with that of naive control and
control dsRNA groups. Beta-actin control gene was used for ratiometric
analysis of U-type mRNA expression level. * and † indicate
significant difference (P<0.05) from the naïve control and
control dsRNA treatments, respectively.
Acute U-type dsRNA knockdown suppresses aerial respiratory behaviour
in adult L. stagnalis in vivo.
Summary of the (A) total breathing time, (B) duration per opening event,
and (C) number of opening events for naïve control
(n = 24), control dsRNA
(n = 13), and U-type dsRNA injected snails
(n = 17). U-type dsRNA injected snails only showed
significant reduction in total breathing time (55.82±7.13 s) and
number of opening events (2.65±0.31) when compared to naive
control (total breathing time of 134.60±17.76 s and
5.42±0.36 opening events) and control dsRNA (total breathing time
of 123.77±15.82 s and 4.94±0.45 opening events). Average
opening duration for U-type dsRNA (21.09±1.46 s) injected group
is not significantly different from the naive control (24.85±1.51
s) and control dsRNA (25.05±2.86 s) injected snails. (D) Summary
of real-time PCR performed following behavior experiments. Ganglia from
U-type dsRNA injected snails that showed decrease in aerial respiratory
behavior were used to confirm U-type channel knockdown with real-time
qPCR. The result was then compared with that of naive control and
control dsRNA groups. Beta-actin control gene was used for ratiometric
analysis of U-type mRNA expression level. * and † indicate
significant difference (P<0.05) from the naïve control and
control dsRNA treatments, respectively.
Discussion
In this study, we have demonstrated that an inward Na+-conductance
leak current component at rest regulates the rhythmic activity of a respiratory
pacemaker neuron, RPeD1. Acute knockdown of the channel gene decreased the
functional channel expression and suppressed the rhythmic firing of the pacemaker
neuron, and inhibited breathing activity. The U-type channel protein sequence shared
∼50% homology with the pore region of the NALCN channel and exhibited
similar biophysical and pharmacological properties, thus the U-type channel is
likely a Lymnaea orthologue of NALCN-like channel. The
ILeak-Na conducted though the U-type channels is critical in
modulating the rCPG rhythmic activity. This is the first study providing direct
evidence of a NALCN-like channel regulating activities of pacemaker neurons, and its
functional significance in breathing activity determined by the pacemaker neurons at
the whole animal level.Many ion channels have been identified as contributors to pacemaker activities in
vertebrates. These include: persistent Na+ currents
(INaP) [24]–[28], leak K+ current (IK-LEAK)
[26],
Ca2+-activated voltage-insensitive non-specific cation current
(ICaN) [28], [29], hyperpolarizing activated current (Ih) [30]–[33], small
conductance Ca2+-activated K+ current
(ISK) [32], [34], [35], and subthreshold Ca2+ currents
(ICa-T) [27], [36]. In invertebrates, similar currents have also been
identified to modulate various CPG network models [11], [22], [37]. In our study,
Na+ leak through U-type channels (IU-type) represents
a major component in subthreshold current densities. Background Na+
current has been previously identified in respiratory pacemaker neurons in rodent
[5], by
stabilizing bursting activities. Given the relative depolarized nature of the RMP in
rodent rCPG pacemaker neurons [5] and other pacemaker neurons [4], [8], it is likely that the
Ileak-Na current via NALCN channel regulates the resting membrane
potential in the similar manner of U-type channel in the snail. The
voltage-dependent component of inward hyperpolarizing current (
and
) is likely an Ih
conductance. Although previous studies have not identified Ih component
from other L. stagnalis neurons [22], the presence of the
Ih in RPeD1 cells has not been excluded. Pacemaker bursting activity
in pacemaker neurons is also mediated by INaP and IK-LEAK in
rodents [26],
[38] and
L. stagnalis
[22].
ILeak-Na via the NALCN or NALCN-like channels could be another
conserved component that is essential for bursting activity across species.The RMP is one of the essential prerequisite that determines pacemaker activity [39], and is
determined largely by the ionic permeability of the cell membrane [7], [40] at rest.
Membrane permeability to K+ through K leak channels has been
considered as the key conductance to determine the RMP [7]. However, the RMP of most
pacemaker neurons are more depolarized than the equilibrium potential of
K+, suggesting additional outward current component [4], [8]. Resting
Na+ conductance may be derived from numerous sources, including
window current from voltage-gated Na+ channels,
hyperpolarization-activated channels, persistent Na+ channels and
Na+-coupled transporters. NALCN channels have been considered to
be the major contributor to background Na+ leak current in
hippocampal neurons [9], [23]. The NALCN channel was first cloned from rat brain
preparation [41]. The
leak current conductance of the channel, however, remains inconclusive because of a
lack of the background Na+ leak conductance following overexpression
of the NALCN channel on HEK293 cells [42]. Our results in the pacemaker
RPeD1 neurons support the notion that NALCN-like channels conducts leak
Na+ current at rest.The in-vivo knockdown through RNAi gene silencing has been widely
used to study protein function in developed organisms [43], including L.
stagnalis
[20], [21], [44]. Both long
dsRNA and short siRNA have been used to induce gene silencing in L.
stagnalis
[20], [21], [44]. One of the
shortcomings of RNAi approach is the possibility of its off-targeting effect on
non-specific genes. We attempted to remedy this possibility by employing three
different dsRNA sequences consisting of both long dsRNA and short siRNAs. The two
siRNA were synthesized from two different fragments of U-type mRNA sequence
(AF484085 and AF484086). The selection criteria consist of selecting for moderate to
low G/C content, biasing toward the 3′-terminus and purposely avoiding
sequences encoding the transmembrane domain [45]. The resulting siRNA sequence
was BLAST searched against known genes sequences in all available databases to avoid
complementary paring with any known ion channel sequences. All three RNAi sequences
resulted in a >40% knockdown in U-type mRNA level, a reduction of the
ILeak-Na, hyperpolarized resting membrane potential, decrease in AP
firing activity of the pacemaker RPeD1 neuron, and suppressed respiratory behaviour.
Our findings are consistent and thus suggest that the U-type channel RNAi in
L. stagnalis is likely specific.NALCN channel may affect synaptic transmission. C. elegans
orthologues of the NALCN channels are critical in the conduction of depolarizing
signal from the soma to the axon [46] and mutation of this channel impairs presynaptic release
[47]. NALCN
orthologue is highly expressed at synapses in D. melanogaster
[48], but
perisynaptically in C. elegans
[46]. In rodents, the
NALCN is modulated by substance P and neurotensin through G-protein independent and
Src family of tyrosine kinases-dependent pathway [49]. The NALCN channel conductance in
the pancreatic β-cells is activated by M3 muscarinic receptors [42]. The rCPG
network in adult L. stagnalis consists of three neurons [15]. RPeD1 forms a
mutual inhibitory synapse with VD4 neuron which innervates to motor neurons closing
pneumostome. RPeD1 forms excitatory synapse with IP3I which leads to pneumostome
opening. Reduction of U-type channel expression decreases the number of openings,
but has less effect on closing of the pneumostome (
), indicating the rCPG
network is differentially regulated by ILeak-Na conductance. Shifting the
RMP to the hyperpolarizing direction may reduce the excitatory synaptic input of
RPeD1 to IP3I and relieve the inhibitory input on VD4; thus, the rCPG output favours
the decrease in pneumostone openings rather than duration of the opening. This study
leads to new avenues to further our understanding of rhythm regulation of CPG
network.
Materials and Methods
Animals and aerial respiratory behavioural observation
Freshwater pond snails, L. stagnalis, were obtained from an
inbred culture at the Free University in Amsterdam, and raised and maintained in
18–20°C aquaria on a 12 hr light/12 hr dark cycle aquaria at the
University of Toronto [20], [50]. Six-week old snails were used in all experiments. To
study the aerial breathing behaviour of the snails, individually labelled snails
were placed in a 1000 mL beaker filled with 500 mL of water. Snails were allowed
10 minutes acclimatizing to the new environment. Aerial respiratory behaviour of
the snails was monitored by observing the physical opening and closing of the
gas exchange orifice, pneumostome, at the water-air interphase. The duration and
number of each pneumostome opening and closing event were recorded for 1
hour.
Ganglionic RNA preparation and cDNA synthesis
The central ring ganglia were excised from anaesthetized snails (in 10%
v/v Listerine for 5 min). Two excised ganglionic rings were used for each total
RNA extraction following a modified Trizol method (Invitrogen) as described
preciously [50].
First strand synthesis of cDNA was conducted using SuperScript III reverse
transcriptase (Invitrogen) with random hexamer primer (Fermentas) in total
volume of 20 µl for 1 µg of total RNA.
RNAi synthesis and delivery
The double-strained RNA and siRNA were synthesized as described previously [20], [21], [50]. Specifically,
the primers for the U-type channel (GenBank#, AF484085) dsRNA were designed with
T7 phage polymerase promoters at the 5′ end of the primers, and the primer
sequences were shown in Table
1. The U-type channel gene was amplified from a standard DNA library
of the snail ganglia, using the 2x PCR master mix (Fermentas, USA) using
conventional PCR (PTC-100TM Programmable Thermal Controllor). The samples were
amplified with the temperature profile of 94°C/2 min, 94°C/30″,
(Tm - 5°C)/30″, 72°C/30″ and a final
elongation of 72°C for 10 minutes. The amplified products were then purified
using the PureLink™ PCR Purification Kit (Invitrogen, USA) according to
the manufacturer's instructions. The control dsRNA was synthesized from a
linearlized pcDNA3 vector with a T7 and SP6 promoter sequence. The RNA was
transcribed using MEGAscript High Yield Transcription Kit following instructions
provided by the manufacturer (Ambion). The synthesized RNAs were then denatured
in 85°C water bath for 10 minutes and allowed to gradually anneal as bath
cooled to room temperature.
Table 1
Primer sequences of U-type channel and β-actin for real-time PCR
analysis.
*T7 promoter sequence (5′-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGA-3′) has
been tagged on to the U-type channel gene sequence for transcribing
RNA in dsRNA synthesis.
*T7 promoter sequence (5′-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGA-3′) has
been tagged on to the U-type channel gene sequence for transcribing
RNA in dsRNA synthesis.The 27-mer siRNAs specific to the U-type channel genes were designed using
SciTools RNAi Design online software (IDT DNA), and the siRNA sequences are
shown in Table 2. Two
specific U-type channel siRNA and a control siRNA were purchased from IDT DNA as
described previously [21], [50]. TriFECTa control was used as the control siRNA.
Table 2
Sequences of siRNAs used in the knockdown study.
Name
Sequence
Oligomers
U-type siRNA 1 (AF484085.1)
5′-
UUCAUCAACCAUAACAAGUUUCCAGGA -3′
27
3′- dAdAGUAGUUGGUAUUGUUCAAAGGUCCU -5′
U-type siRNA 2 (AF484086.1)
5′-
GAUGGUUUGCUUGGCAACUUCUUCCUC -3′
27
3′- dCdTACCAAACGAACCGUUGAAGAAGGAG -5′
TriFECTa control
5′-
UCACAAGGGAGAGAAAGAGAGGAAGGA -3′
27
3′- dAdGUGUUCCCUCUCUUUCUCUCCUUCCU -5′
N represents a deoxyribonucleotide, and the remaining N represents
ribonucleotides.
N represents a deoxyribonucleotide, and the remaining N represents
ribonucleotides.For dsRNA/siRNA delivery, 10% Listerine anaesthetized snails were injected
with µl of dsRNA (3 µg/µl) or siRNA (20 µM) in an area
caudal to the buccal mass and dorsal to the central ring ganglia [20], [21]. Aerial
respiratory behaviours were observed 3 days post-injection.
Real-time qPCR was performed using Platinum SYBR Green qPCR SuperMix
(Invitrogen). 5 µl of the mix was added to 1 µl of 2.5 µM
primers (Table 1) and 0.1
µl cDNA, and topped off with 0.5% diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated
water to a final volume of 10 µl. Individual cDNA samples were run in
identical triplicates. The reactions were performed in 384-well dishes and run
in a Real-Time PCR System (7900HT, Applied Biosystems, ABI) controlled by
SDS2.2.1 software, with the cycling parameters of 50°C for 5 min and
95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 seconds and
55°C for 30 seconds followed by a melting curve protocol. The peak of the
first-derivative in the melting curve and the shape of the amplification curve
were used to assess the quality of the PCR. Ratiometric target (U-type)/control
(β-actin) transcript levels were analyzed using the ΔΔCt
method [51].
The data were normalized to corresponding naïve control, a reference group,
(Ratio = (eff target gene)ΔCTtarget
(control-treated)/(eff reference gene)ΔCTreference
(control-treated)). A value of one represents no change in the
relative mRNA expression levels, with values greater than one representing an
increase and values less than one representing a decrease in the relative mRNA
expression.
Primary cell culture
Right pedal dorsal 1 (RPeD1) cells, the pacemaker neurons exhibiting spontaneous
firing properties and initiates the respiratory rhythm, were isolated and
maintained in culture as previously described [15], [52]. For gene silencing
experiments, whole animals were first injected with 2 µl of dsRNA (3
µg/µl) or siRNA (20 µM) 3 days prior to cell isolation.
Isolated cells were plated and maintained in culturing media containing 2
µg/ml of dsRNA or 20 nM of siRNA for 12 to 24 hours prior to
recording.
Electrophysiology
Whole-cell patch clamp recordings (ruptured) were performed on cultured RPeD1
neurons, as described previously [53]. The microelectrode pipettes filled with
intracellular solution containing (in mM) 29 KCl, 2.3 CaCl2, 2 MgATP,
10 HEPES, 11 EGTA, and 0.1 GTPTris (pH 7.6 adjusted with 1 M KOH) were used.
Bath solution, consist of saline snail containing (mM): NaCl 51.3, KCl 1.7,
CaCl2 4.1, MgCl2 1.5, HEPES 2 (adjusted to pH 7.9
using NaOH), was focally perfused onto the cells with a gravity-driven perfusion
system. Signals were recorded and amplified with a personal computer equipped
with pClampex 9.2 (Axon Instruments) and MultiClamp 700A connected to Digidata
1322 digitizer, respectively. Data were filtered at 1 kHz (−3 dB) using a
4-pole Bessel filter and digitized at a sampling frequency of 2 kHz.
Na+-free solution contained (mM) 51.3 N-methyl D-glucamine
(NMDG) to substitute Na+ ions. Under voltage-clamp mode, leak
currents were measured by subtracting the total current traces with the
non-linear voltage-dependent currents recorded with a P/4 subtraction protocol
using pClampex 9.2 (
). Data were analyzed with Clampfit 9.2 (Axon Instrument)
and plotted with Origin Pro v8 (Origin Lab Co., Northhampton, MA, USA). Curve
fitting was performed with Origin Pro v8. All the recordings were performed at
room temperature (∼22°C).Under current-clamp mode, conventional sharp electrode recordings were performed
to monitor the spontaneous bursting firing activity of RPeD1 cells. Sharp
electrodes were filled with saturated K2SO4 solution
(70–80 MΩ) and bath solution with snail saline. Resting membrane
potential was measured within 2 minutes after impaling the RPeD1. Input
resistance was calculated based on the size of injected hyperpolarizing current
and the resulting membrane potential (−70 to −120 mV), following
Ohm's law. At the end of each experiment resting membrane potential and
electrode resistance were again measured. The spontaneous action potential (AP)
frequency and inter-spike intervals were analyzed with Clampfit 9.2 (Axon
Instrument). Logarithmic histograms of the inter-spike intervals at bin size 20
were plotted with Clampfit 9.2 to describe the bursting firing pattern. AP
amplitude, rise time, decay time, and half width duration were measured Mini
Analysis Program ver. 6.01 (Synaptosoft, Decatur, GA, USA).To test sensitivity of leak current to tetrodotoxin (TTX) block, TTX was added in
the bath solution and perfused onto RPeD1 cells. In addition, snail saline
containing either Gd3+ (10 mM) or low [Ca]o
(0.5 mM) was perfused onto the RPeD1 cells to study their effects on the leak
current activities and membrane potentials.
Data analysis and statistics
All data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. Statistical analysis was carried
out using OriginPro v8 (Origin Lab Co) or SigmaStat (3.0, Jandel Scientific).
Difference between experimental groups was evaluated using a Student's
t-test for two groups and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by
Holm-Sidak post hoc test for multiple experimental groups. Significance was
defined by probability level of lower than 0.05
(P<0.05).Partial knockdown of U-type channel reduces inward hyperpolarizing
Na (A)
Representative Na+ current generated by subtracting the
current obtained in Na+ free condition from that in saline
from RPeD1 neurons in naive control, control dsRNA, and U-type dsRNA
treatments (from the data presented in Figure 5B). (B) Average INa
density-voltage (I–V) relations of naive control
(n = 8), control dsRNA (n = 6),
and U-type dsRNA (n = 8) treatment. U-type knockdown
significantly reduces inward INa densities at all hyperpolarizing
voltages (P<0.05).(PDF)Click here for additional data file.TTX regulates voltage-gated Na
RPeD1 neuron
in a dose-dependent manner. (A) Representative
Na+ currents activated from a voltage step from a
holding voltage of −50 mV to +10 mV in the absence or presence of
various TTX concentrations. Note a residual current that was not blocked by
300 µM of TTX; it is considered TTX-insensitive component. (B)
Dose-response curve of the TTX sensitive voltage-gated Na+
current. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m.
(n = 3) and the curve was fit with Hill equation.
Half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) is 23.7
µM.(PDF)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Zhong-Ping Feng; Nikita Grigoriev; David Munno; Ken Lukowiak; Brian A MacVicar; Jeffrey I Goldberg; Naweed I Syed Journal: J Physiol Date: 2002-02-15 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: M T van Diepen; G E Spencer; J van Minnen; Y Gouwenberg; J Bouwman; A B Smit; R E van Kesteren Journal: Mol Cell Neurosci Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 4.314
Authors: Maelle Jospin; Shigeki Watanabe; Deepa Joshi; Sean Young; Kevin Hamming; Colin Thacker; Terrance P Snutch; Erik M Jorgensen; Kim Schuske Journal: Curr Biol Date: 2007-09-06 Impact factor: 10.834
Authors: Jessica X Chong; Margaret J McMillin; Kathryn M Shively; Anita E Beck; Colby T Marvin; Jose R Armenteros; Kati J Buckingham; Naomi T Nkinsi; Evan A Boyle; Margaret N Berry; Maureen Bocian; Nicola Foulds; Maria Luisa Giovannucci Uzielli; Chad Haldeman-Englert; Raoul C M Hennekam; Paige Kaplan; Antonie D Kline; Catherine L Mercer; Malgorzata J M Nowaczyk; Jolien S Klein Wassink-Ruiter; Elizabeth W McPherson; Regina A Moreno; Angela E Scheuerle; Vandana Shashi; Cathy A Stevens; John C Carey; Arnaud Monteil; Philippe Lory; Holly K Tabor; Joshua D Smith; Jay Shendure; Deborah A Nickerson; Michael J Bamshad Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 11.025