Literature DB >> 21525314

How muscles define maximum running performance in lizards: an analysis using swing- and stance-phase muscles.

Timothy E Higham1, Paul G Korchari, Lance D McBrayer.   

Abstract

Maximum locomotor performance is crucial for capturing prey, escaping predators and many other behaviors. However, we know little about what defines maximum performance in vertebrates. Muscles drive the movement of the limbs during locomotion, and thus likely play a major role in defining locomotor capacity. For lizards, the iliofibularis, a swing-phase muscle, is often linked to ecology and/or performance. However, stance-phase muscles likely limit performance given that they propel the animal. Using a small semi-arboreal lizard (Sceloporus woodi), we compared how swing- and stance-phase muscles relate to maximum running speed and acceleration. We employed both a level and vertical trackway to elicit ecologically relevant locomotor performance. Six individuals were filmed at 250 frames s⁻¹ in lateral view. Following performance trials, upper and lower hindlimbs were sectioned and assessed using histochemistry. Fast glycolytic, fast oxidative and slow oxidative fibers were detected and counted in the gastrocnemius (GA; stance phase) and iliofibularis (IF; swing phase) muscles. In addition, the mean fiber diameter for each fiber type in each muscle was determined, as was the fiber cross-sectional area. We found that properties of the GA, but not the IF, were positively correlated with performance. Interestingly, certain attributes of the GA were correlated with maximum vertical locomotion whereas others were correlated with maximum level locomotion. We conclude that stance phase, not swing phase, limits maximum performance in this species of lizard. In addition, we highlight the need to include properties of stance-phase muscles and a spectrum of ecologically relevant behaviors when attempting to correlate locomotor physiology with ecology and/or performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21525314     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.051045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  6 in total

1.  Is the whole more than the sum of its parts? Evolutionary trade-offs between burst and sustained locomotion in lacertid lizards.

Authors:  B Vanhooydonck; R S James; J Tallis; P Aerts; Z Tadic; K A Tolley; G J Measey; A Herrel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Springs, steroids, and slingshots: the roles of enhancers and constraints in animal movement.

Authors:  Timothy E Higham; Duncan J Irschick
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Cystic Calculus in a Laboratory-housed Green Anole (Anolis carolinensis).

Authors:  Leslie L Birke; Ann M Cespedes; Emma R Schachner; Simon P Lailvaux
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 0.982

Review 4.  The likely effects of thermal climate change on vertebrate skeletal muscle mechanics with possible consequences for animal movement and behaviour.

Authors:  Rob S James; Jason Tallis
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.079

5.  Camouflage versus running performance as strategies against predation in a lizard inhabiting different habitats.

Authors:  Lixia Wan; Zhenxia Liu; Tao Wang; Minglu Yang; Jiasheng Li; Hui Sun; Chenkai Niu; Wei Zhao; Yuanting Jin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Geckos decouple fore- and hind limb kinematics in response to changes in incline.

Authors:  Aleksandra V Birn-Jeffery; Timothy E Higham
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.172

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.